/**
 * USER_JOURNEYS.md §9 — ban / unban / promote / demote. Driven mostly through
 * the API because the host dashboard UI changes shape often; integration
 * coverage of the buttons lives in a separate UI-focused spec.
 */
import { test, expect } from '../../fixtures/test';
import { seedUpload, seedComment } from '../../helpers/seed';

test.describe('Host — moderation API', () => {
  test('ban always hides — a banned user is is_banned AND uploads_hidden (USER_JOURNEYS §9.5)', async ({
    api,
    host,
    guest,
  }) => {
    // Ban is unconditionally a hide: a banned user's content is "gone" everywhere. The endpoint
    // takes no body and there is no per-request opt-out (the legacy hide_uploads flag is gone).
    const target = await guest('Banned2');
    await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
    const users = await api.listUsers(host.jwt);
    const row = users.find((u: any) => u.id === target.userId);
    expect(row?.is_banned).toBe(true);
    expect(row?.uploads_hidden).toBe(true);
  });

  test('banned user cannot call /upload', async ({ api, host, guest }) => {
    const target = await guest('Banned3');
    await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);

    // Direct fetch — multipart body shape is just a marker; the auth middleware should reject before parsing.
    const res = await fetch(
      (process.env.E2E_FRONTEND_URL ?? 'http://localhost:3101') + '/api/v1/upload',
      {
        method: 'POST',
        headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${target.jwt}` },
        body: new FormData(),
      }
    );
    expect(res.status).toBe(403);
  });

  test('host can promote a guest to host', async ({ api, host, guest }) => {
    const target = await guest('Promoted');
    await api.setRole(host.jwt, target.userId, 'host');
    const users = await api.listUsers(host.jwt);
    const row = users.find((u: any) => u.id === target.userId);
    expect(row?.role).toBe('host');
  });
});

/**
 * Regression for the review's H1: role & ban used to be trusted from the JWT and
 * never re-checked against the DB, so a demoted/banned host kept full powers for
 * the life of their token (up to 30d) and a banned host could even unban
 * themselves. The auth extractor now re-reads the live user row, so these take
 * effect on the *existing* session with no re-login.
 */
test.describe('Host — live role/ban revocation (H1)', () => {
  test('a demoted host loses host powers on their existing session', async ({
    api,
    adminToken,
    guest,
  }) => {
    const u = await guest('DemoteMidSession');
    await api.setRole(adminToken, u.userId, 'host');
    // Fresh host token (role is encoded at mint time).
    const { body } = await api.recover(u.displayName, u.pin);
    const hostJwt = body.jwt;

    // Sanity: the token currently has host powers.
    await api.listUsers(hostJwt);

    // Demote via admin — the host does NOT re-login.
    await api.setRole(adminToken, u.userId, 'guest');

    // Same token is now rejected with exactly 403 (RequireHost sees the DB role,
    // not the JWT claim). Asserting the status guards against a spurious 500
    // masquerading as "revoked".
    await expect(api.listUsers(hostJwt)).rejects.toThrow(/→ 403/);
  });

  test('a banned host is locked out immediately on their existing session', async ({
    api,
    adminToken,
    host,
  }) => {
    // Sanity: host token works.
    await api.listUsers(host.jwt);

    await api.banUser(adminToken, host.userId);

    // Banned users are rejected with 403 by the auth extractor before any handler runs.
    await expect(api.listUsers(host.jwt)).rejects.toThrow(/→ 403/);
  });

  test('a banned host cannot unban themselves', async ({ api, adminToken, host }) => {
    await api.banUser(adminToken, host.userId);
    await expect(api.unbanUser(host.jwt, host.userId, { expectedStatus: [204] })).rejects.toThrow(
      /→ 403/
    );
  });

  // H1 / USER_JOURNEYS §10: a banned user keeps *read* access but every write is
  // rejected with 403. The ban is enforced on write handlers + Require{Host,Admin},
  // NOT in the base extractor (which would wrongly block reads too).
  test('a banned user keeps read access but is blocked from writes', async ({
    api,
    host,
    guest,
    db,
  }) => {
    const base = process.env.E2E_FRONTEND_URL ?? 'http://localhost:3101';
    const target = await guest('BannedRW');
    const auth = (jwt: string) => ({ Authorization: `Bearer ${jwt}` });

    // Seed content the target OWNS *before* the ban, so the delete/edit paths get
    // past the ownership check and it's genuinely the ban guard being exercised.
    const ownUpload = await seedUpload(target.jwt, { caption: 'mine' });
    const ownComment = await seedComment(target.jwt, ownUpload, 'my comment');

    await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);

    // Reads still succeed.
    const read = await fetch(base + '/api/v1/me/context', { headers: auth(target.jwt) });
    expect(read.status).toBe(200);

    // Every write is rejected — cover ALL guest-reachable mutations, not just
    // /upload. delete_upload / delete_comment / edit_upload previously skipped the
    // ban guard (a banned owner could still delete/edit their own content).
    const create = await fetch(base + '/api/v1/upload', {
      method: 'POST',
      headers: auth(target.jwt),
      body: new FormData(),
    });
    expect(create.status).toBe(403);

    const delUpload = await fetch(base + `/api/v1/upload/${ownUpload}`, {
      method: 'DELETE',
      headers: auth(target.jwt),
    });
    expect(delUpload.status).toBe(403);

    const editUpload = await fetch(base + `/api/v1/upload/${ownUpload}`, {
      method: 'PATCH',
      headers: { ...auth(target.jwt), 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
      body: JSON.stringify({ caption: 'edited while banned' }),
    });
    expect(editUpload.status).toBe(403);

    const delComment = await fetch(base + `/api/v1/comment/${ownComment}`, {
      method: 'DELETE',
      headers: auth(target.jwt),
    });
    expect(delComment.status).toBe(403);

    // The upload survived every blocked write — the delete was rejected, so the row still
    // exists (deleted_at IS NULL). We check the DB directly rather than the feed: ban now
    // ALWAYS hides, so a banned user's own upload is (correctly) filtered out of every feed
    // even though the row is intact. Read access to *other* content is proven by the 200 on
    // /me/context above.
    expect(await db.countUploadsForUser(target.userId)).toBe(1);
  });
});
