chore: raise the db memory limit and rate-limit social writes

Two smaller operational items.

POSTGRES 512M -> 1G. DATABASE_MAX_CONNECTIONS is 30 for a ~100-guest event (feed
polling + SSE + uploads at once), and 30 backends plus Postgres 16's default
shared_buffers leaves very little headroom at 512M. An OOM here doesn't degrade one
feature -- every request path touches the database, so it takes the event down.
Memory is the cheaper knob than shrinking the pool back and reintroducing the
queueing it was raised to fix. .env.example now names the pairing explicitly, the way
it already does for COMPRESSION_WORKER_CONCURRENCY.

SOCIAL WRITES WERE UNTHROTTLED. toggle_like, add_comment and delete_comment were the
only mutating endpoints in the app with no limit at all -- upload, join, recover,
export and admin login all carry one. Asymmetric coverage rather than a deliberate
decision.

Low severity, and honestly so: a like fans an SSE broadcast to every client, but the
export regeneration a comment deletion triggers is contained (REGEN_DEBOUNCE 20s,
workers born with their epoch, superseded ones inert). So the ceiling is 120/min --
far above anything a real guest produces. This bounds a script, not an enthusiastic
double-tapper.

ONE bucket across all three actions: separate buckets would let a caller triple the
aggregate write rate by alternating between them. Keyed per USER, matching the feed
and upload limits -- at a venue every guest is behind one NAT, and an IP key is what
made the /join and /feed limits turn guests away in the first place.

Migration 020 seeds both keys, and both are wired into the admin allowlist, the
config UI and the e2e reseed -- the step two earlier per-area toggles missed, which
left switches that existed in code and could never be flipped.

Tests: 4 e2e, including that the shared bucket really is shared (the part most likely
to be lost in a refactor) and that one guest hitting the ceiling doesn't block
another behind the same IP.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

backend/migrations/020_social_rate.down.sql

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+DELETE FROM config WHERE key IN ('social_rate_per_min', 'social_rate_enabled');

backend/migrations/020_social_rate.up.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+-- Per-user rate limit for social writes (likes, comments, comment deletions).
+--
+-- These were the only writes in the app with no limit at all. Every other mutating
+-- path -- upload, join, recover, export, admin login -- carries one; social.rs
+-- carried none, so the coverage was asymmetric rather than deliberately open.
+--
+-- Severity is genuinely low for an invited-guest event, and the amplification worry
+-- turned out to be contained: a like fans an SSE broadcast to ~100 clients, but the
+-- export regeneration it could otherwise trigger is debounced (REGEN_DEBOUNCE 20s)
+-- and superseded workers are inert. So this closes the gap for symmetry, not urgency,
+-- and the ceiling is set high enough that no real guest will ever meet it -- a
+-- double-tapping enthusiast at a wedding is not the thing being defended against.
+INSERT INTO config (key, value) VALUES
+    ('social_rate_per_min',  '120'),
+    ('social_rate_enabled',  'true')
+ON CONFLICT (key) DO NOTHING;

backend/src/handlers/admin.rs

@@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ pub async fn patch_config(
         // Same shape for /recover: the per-(ip, name) bucket is the anti-guessing control,
         // this only bounds a name-cycling flood in front of a cost-12 bcrypt (migration 019).
         ("recover_ip_rate_per_min", true, 1.0, 100_000.0),
+        // Aggregate ceiling on likes + comments + comment deletions, per user per minute.
+        // These were the only mutating endpoints with no limit at all (migration 020).
+        ("social_rate_per_min", true, 1.0, 100_000.0),
         ("quota_tolerance", false, 0.0, 1.0),
         ("estimated_guest_count", true, 1.0, 1_000_000.0),
     ];
@@ -141,6 +144,7 @@ pub async fn patch_config(
         // missing from this allowlist — so the switch existed in code and could never be flipped.
         "admin_login_rate_enabled",
         "recover_rate_enabled",
+        "social_rate_enabled",
         "quota_enabled",
         "storage_quota_enabled",
         "upload_count_quota_enabled",

backend/src/handlers/social.rs

@@ -10,8 +10,40 @@ use crate::error::AppError;
 use crate::models::comment::{Comment, CommentDto};
 use crate::models::hashtag::{self, Hashtag};
 use crate::models::upload::Upload;
+use crate::services::config;
 use crate::state::AppState;
 
+/// Throttle a social write. Keyed PER USER, like the feed and upload limits and for the same
+/// reason: at a venue every guest sits behind one NAT, so an IP key hands the whole party a
+/// single bucket and the most active guest starves everyone else.
+///
+/// These were the only mutating endpoints in the app with no limit at all — the coverage was
+/// asymmetric, not deliberately open. The ceiling is set well above anything a real guest
+/// produces; this bounds a script, not an enthusiastic double-tapper.
+async fn check_social_rate(state: &AppState, user_id: Uuid) -> Result<(), AppError> {
+    let rate_limits_on = config::get_bool(&state.config_cache, "rate_limits_enabled", true).await;
+    let social_rate_on = config::get_bool(&state.config_cache, "social_rate_enabled", true).await;
+    if !(rate_limits_on && social_rate_on) {
+        return Ok(());
+    }
+    let rate_limit = config::get_usize(&state.config_cache, "social_rate_per_min", 120).await;
+    // ONE bucket across likes, comments and comment deletions. Separate buckets would let a
+    // caller triple the aggregate write rate just by alternating between them.
+    state
+        .rate_limiter
+        .check_with_retry(
+            format!("social:{user_id}"),
+            rate_limit,
+            std::time::Duration::from_secs(60),
+        )
+        .map_err(|retry_after_secs| {
+            AppError::TooManyRequests(
+                "Zu viele Aktionen. Bitte warte kurz und versuche es erneut.".into(),
+                Some(retry_after_secs),
+            )
+        })
+}
+
 #[derive(Serialize)]
 pub struct LikeResponse {
     /// The caller's like state *after* this toggle. The client sets `liked_by_me` from
@@ -35,6 +67,7 @@ pub async fn toggle_like(
     if user.is_banned {
         return Err(AppError::Forbidden("Du bist gesperrt.".into()));
     }
+    check_social_rate(&state, auth.user_id).await?;
 
     // Event-scope: the upload must belong to the caller's event (404 otherwise),
     // matching the host handlers' find_by_id_and_event pattern.
@@ -141,6 +174,7 @@ pub async fn add_comment(
     if user.is_banned {
         return Err(AppError::Forbidden("Du bist gesperrt.".into()));
     }
+    check_social_rate(&state, auth.user_id).await?;
 
     // Event-scope: only comment on an upload that belongs to the caller's event.
     Upload::find_by_id_and_event(&state.pool, upload_id, auth.event_id)
@@ -216,6 +250,7 @@ pub async fn delete_comment(
     if auth.is_banned {
         return Err(AppError::Forbidden("Du bist gesperrt.".into()));
     }
+    check_social_rate(&state, auth.user_id).await?;
     let comment = Comment::find_by_id(&state.pool, comment_id)
         .await?
         .ok_or_else(|| AppError::NotFound("Kommentar nicht gefunden.".into()))?;

backend/src/handlers/test_admin.rs

@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ pub async fn truncate_all(
             ('export_rate_per_day',        '3'),
             ('join_ip_rate_per_min',       '60'),
             ('recover_ip_rate_per_min',    '30'),
+            ('social_rate_per_min',        '120'),
             ('quota_tolerance',            '0.75'),
             ('estimated_guest_count',      '100'),
             ('compression_concurrency',    '2'),
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ pub async fn truncate_all(
             ('feed_rate_enabled',          'false'),
             ('export_rate_enabled',        'false'),
             ('join_rate_enabled',          'false'),
+            ('social_rate_enabled',        'false'),
             ('admin_login_rate_enabled',   'false'),
             ('quota_enabled',              'false'),
             ('storage_quota_enabled',      'false'),