feat(db): idempotency keys, ban-aware counts, and a host audit trail

Four migrations, all additive against a database that already has 001-025 applied.

026 narrows the client-upload idempotency index with `AND deleted_at IS NULL`. The old
index made a soft-deleted row keep its key forever, so a guest who deleted a photo and
re-sent the same one had the retry silently swallowed. The new indexed set is a strict
subset of the old, so it cannot fail on existing rows.

027 adds `client_join_id`, which lets a join retry after a lost response resume the same
account instead of 409ing on a name the caller itself owns. Every existing row gets NULL
and the partial index excludes NULLs, so it indexes nothing at creation.

028 brings the feed view's like/comment counts in line with what the feed actually renders:
a banned guest's rows were still counted, so a card showed "3 comments" above two.
`comment.rs` gets the matching `NOT u.is_banned` on the live read path — the export and
hashtag queries already filtered it, so the two views of one moderation action disagreed.

029 records host moderation actions, which were previously invisible after the fact.

Verified by applying 001-029 to a real Postgres against seeded data, including a
soft-deleted row holding a key and a banned user's like and comment. 026's down-migration
legitimately fails where a deleted and a live row share a key — that is inherent to the
direction, documented in the file, and sqlx never runs downs at boot.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

backend/src/services/audit.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+//! Append-only record of privileged actions. See migration 029 for why it exists.
+//!
+//! Design constraints, both learned from the rest of this codebase:
+//!
+//!  * **Never fail the action.** An audit write that can turn a successful ban into a 500 makes
+//!    moderation less reliable than no audit at all. Every failure here is logged and swallowed.
+//!  * **Never store a credential.** `reset_pin` is the action most worth recording and the one
+//!    whose payload must never be in `detail` — a table that could hand back a guest's PIN would
+//!    be a worse privacy problem than the gap it closes.
+
+use serde_json::Value;
+use sqlx::PgPool;
+use uuid::Uuid;
+
+use crate::models::user::UserRole;
+
+/// Record one privileged action.
+///
+/// Takes `&PgPool` rather than a transaction on purpose: the audit row is not part of the action's
+/// atomicity. If the action commits and the audit write fails we want the action to stand (and a
+/// loud log line); if the action rolls back, an orphan audit row saying "someone tried" is more
+/// useful than silence.
+#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
+pub async fn record(
+    pool: &PgPool,
+    event_id: Uuid,
+    actor_id: Uuid,
+    actor_name: Option<&str>,
+    actor_role: UserRole,
+    action: &str,
+    target_id: Option<Uuid>,
+    target_name: Option<&str>,
+    detail: Option<Value>,
+) {
+    let result = sqlx::query(
+        "INSERT INTO host_action_audit
+           (event_id, actor_id, actor_name, actor_role, action, target_id, target_name, detail)
+         VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7, $8)",
+    )
+    .bind(event_id)
+    .bind(actor_id)
+    .bind(actor_name)
+    .bind(format!("{actor_role:?}").to_lowercase())
+    .bind(action)
+    .bind(target_id)
+    .bind(target_name)
+    .bind(detail)
+    .execute(pool)
+    .await;
+
+    match result {
+        Ok(_) => {}
+        Err(e) => {
+            // `error`, not `warn`: losing an audit row is the kind of thing that should show up in
+            // whatever is watching the logs, even though it must not fail the request.
+            tracing::error!(
+                error = ?e, action, %actor_id, ?target_id,
+                "failed to write host action audit row"
+            );
+        }
+    }
+}

backend/src/services/mod.rs

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+pub mod audit;
 pub mod compression;
 pub mod config;
 pub mod disk;