fix(rereview): close export-flip race + queue-dedup reload regression

Adversarial re-review of the persona-audit + audit-followup rounds (6411747..)
found one HIGH and one MED regression plus LOW gaps. All fixed with coverage.

HIGH — export stale-keepsake resurrected by an open_event race
  A reopen landing in the window between a *current* export worker's finalize_job
  and its ready-flag flip cleared export_released_at + the ready flags but left the
  export_job row `done` at the same release_seq. The seq-guarded flip then still
  matched and re-set export_{zip,html}_ready=TRUE on a pre-reopen snapshot; the next
  re-release read that stale TRUE and skipped regeneration (`if ready { continue }`),
  serving a keepsake missing every upload from the reopen window — the exact data
  loss migration 012 exists to prevent. Both ready-flip UPDATEs are now additionally
  anchored on `export_released_at IS NOT NULL`, so a landed reopen makes the flip a
  no-op and the re-release regenerates cleanly.

MED — queue dedup broke for reloaded items
  loadQueue rebuilt QueueItems from IndexedDB without copying lastModified, which the
  new addToQueue dedup keys on. A file re-selected after a page reload / PWA relaunch
  missed the duplicate check and uploaded twice. Rehydration now carries lastModified
  (extracted to a pure, tested entryToQueueItem helper).

LOW
  - diashow: clear the upload-processed debounce timer in onDestroy (no stray
    post-unmount /feed fetch).
  - USER_JOURNEYS §9.5: document the reconnect-delta ban replay (hidden_user_ids /
    uploads_hidden_at, migration 013), not just the live user-hidden SSE.
  - e2e api-client: drop the misleading hide_uploads param from banUser — the backend
    takes no body and always hides; strip the dead boolean at all call sites.

Tests
  - Extract isReversibleLock (the terminal-403 KEEP-vs-PURGE-blob discriminator) into a
    pure exported helper + unit tests, so the data-loss-critical branch is covered
    without an XHR harness.
  - entryToQueueItem unit tests lock the lastModified-carry regression.
  - Document the export flip-race guard in the reopen/re-release spec (the sub-ms
    finalize↔flip interleave isn't deterministically forceable with fast fixtures;
    covered by the SQL guard + the end-to-end completeness test).

Verified: backend 40 tests, frontend 44 unit tests, svelte-check 0 errors,
e2e 156 passed / 1 skipped on chromium-desktop.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
fabi
2026-07-13 21:47:44 +02:00
parent 768e712a26
commit df275bbefa
10 changed files with 166 additions and 33 deletions

View File

@@ -303,11 +303,19 @@ async fn run_zip_export_inner(
return Ok(());
}
// Flip the ready flag only while still current (a re-release between finalize and here
// would have cleared it; don't resurrect it for a superseded generation).
// Flip the ready flag only while still current AND still released. The `release_seq`
// EXISTS check alone is NOT enough: a reopen (`open_event`) landing in the window between
// our `finalize_job` above and this UPDATE clears `export_released_at` + both ready flags
// but leaves our `export_job` row `done` at this same seq — so EXISTS would still match and
// we'd resurrect `export_zip_ready = TRUE` on a keepsake that predates the reopen. The next
// re-release would then read that stale TRUE, skip regeneration (`if ready { continue }`),
// and serve a snapshot missing every upload added during the reopen window — the exact
// stale-keepsake data loss migration 012 exists to prevent. Anchoring on
// `export_released_at IS NOT NULL` makes the flip a no-op once a reopen has landed.
sqlx::query(
"UPDATE event SET export_zip_ready = TRUE
WHERE id = $1
AND export_released_at IS NOT NULL
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM export_job
WHERE event_id = $1 AND type = 'zip'::export_type
AND release_seq = $2 AND status = 'done')",
@@ -644,9 +652,12 @@ async fn run_html_export_inner(
return Ok(());
}
// Same released-anchored guard as the ZIP flip (see run_zip_export): a reopen between our
// finalize and here must not resurrect `export_html_ready` on a pre-reopen snapshot.
sqlx::query(
"UPDATE event SET export_html_ready = TRUE
WHERE id = $1
AND export_released_at IS NOT NULL
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM export_job
WHERE event_id = $1 AND type = 'html'::export_type
AND release_seq = $2 AND status = 'done')",

View File

@@ -167,7 +167,11 @@ the Host can clean up later).
5. Banning **always hides**: the user's existing uploads are filtered out of the feed for
everyone (`v_feed`, `find_visible_media`, and the export query all enforce
`is_banned = FALSE`), and a live `user-hidden` SSE event evicts their cards from every
open feed + the diashow without a reload.
open feed + the diashow without a reload. A client that was offline/disconnected during
the live event doesn't miss the eviction: `uploads_hidden_at` is stamped at ban time
(migration 013) and the reconnect delta (`GET /feed/delta`) returns the banned users in
`hidden_user_ids`, so the feed and diashow replay the eviction on the next reconnect —
the projector-missed-the-live-push case is exactly why this exists.
## 11. Admin — instance configuration

View File

@@ -109,10 +109,11 @@ export class ApiClient {
});
}
async banUser(token: string, userId: string, hideUploads = false) {
// A ban ALWAYS hides the user's uploads — the backend takes no body and ignores any
// `hide_uploads` flag (the old opt-out was removed). No per-request options.
async banUser(token: string, userId: string) {
return this.request<void>('POST', `/host/users/${userId}/ban`, {
token,
body: { hide_uploads: hideUploads },
expectedStatus: [200, 204],
});
}

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import { seedUpload, seedComment } from '../../helpers/seed';
test.describe('Host — moderation API', () => {
test('ban with hide_uploads=true sets the right flags', async ({ api, host, guest }) => {
const target = await guest('Banned1');
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId, true);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
const users = await api.listUsers(host.jwt);
const row = users.find((u: any) => u.id === target.userId);
expect(row?.is_banned).toBe(true);
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ test.describe('Host — moderation API', () => {
// Ban is now unconditionally a hide: even asking NOT to hide still hides, because a
// banned user's content is "gone" everywhere. The legacy hide_uploads arg is ignored.
const target = await guest('Banned2');
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId, false);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
const users = await api.listUsers(host.jwt);
const row = users.find((u: any) => u.id === target.userId);
expect(row?.is_banned).toBe(true);
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ test.describe('Host — moderation API', () => {
test('banned user cannot call /upload', async ({ api, host, guest }) => {
const target = await guest('Banned3');
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId, false);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
// Direct fetch — multipart body shape is just a marker; the auth middleware should reject before parsing.
const res = await fetch((process.env.E2E_FRONTEND_URL ?? 'http://localhost:3101') + '/api/v1/upload', {
@@ -88,14 +88,14 @@ test.describe('Host — live role/ban revocation (H1)', () => {
// Sanity: host token works.
await api.listUsers(host.jwt);
await api.banUser(adminToken, host.userId, false);
await api.banUser(adminToken, host.userId);
// Banned users are rejected with 403 by the auth extractor before any handler runs.
await expect(api.listUsers(host.jwt)).rejects.toThrow(/→ 403/);
});
test('a banned host cannot unban themselves', async ({ api, adminToken, host }) => {
await api.banUser(adminToken, host.userId, false);
await api.banUser(adminToken, host.userId);
await expect(
api.unbanUser(host.jwt, host.userId, { expectedStatus: [204] })
).rejects.toThrow(/→ 403/);
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ test.describe('Host — live role/ban revocation (H1)', () => {
const ownUpload = await seedUpload(target.jwt, { caption: 'mine' });
const ownComment = await seedComment(target.jwt, ownUpload, 'my comment');
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId, false);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
// Reads still succeed.
const read = await fetch(base + '/api/v1/me/context', { headers: auth(target.jwt) });

View File

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ test.describe('Host — live SSE eviction (H3)', () => {
const sse = new SseListener();
await sse.start(host.jwt);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId, true);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
await sse.waitForEvent(
'user-hidden',
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ test.describe('Host — live SSE eviction (H3)', () => {
await expect(page.getByText('evict-me-live-xyz').first()).toBeVisible();
// Host hides the target — the viewer's feed must drop the card via SSE, no reload.
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId, true);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
await expect(page.getByText('evict-me-live-xyz')).toHaveCount(0, { timeout: 15_000 });
});
});

View File

@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ test.describe('Adversarial — deep authorization', () => {
test('banned user cannot toggle a like', async ({ api, host, guest }) => {
const target = await guest('BannedLike');
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId, false);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
const res = await fetch(`${BASE}/api/v1/upload/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000/like`, {
method: 'POST',
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ test.describe('Adversarial — deep authorization', () => {
test('banned user cannot post a comment', async ({ api, host, guest }) => {
const target = await guest('BannedComment');
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId, false);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
const res = await fetch(`${BASE}/api/v1/upload/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000/comments`, {
method: 'POST',
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ test.describe('Adversarial — deep authorization', () => {
test('banned user can still read the feed (read-only access preserved)', async ({ api, host, guest }) => {
const target = await guest('BannedRead');
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId, false);
await api.banUser(host.jwt, target.userId);
const res = await fetch(`${BASE}/api/v1/feed`, {
headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${target.jwt}` },

View File

@@ -17,6 +17,18 @@
* superseded worker discards its output instead of resurrecting a stale keepsake. The
* download follows the current `done` row's `file_path`, never a fixed name.
*
* A second, narrower window on the SAME class of bug (fixed alongside): a reopen (`open_event`)
* landing between a *current* worker's `finalize_job` and its ready-flag flip. `open_event`
* clears `export_released_at` + both ready flags but leaves the `export_job` row `done` at the
* current seq — so the seq-guarded flip would still match and resurrect `export_zip_ready=TRUE`
* on a pre-reopen snapshot, and the next re-release would `if ready { continue }` and skip
* regeneration. The flip UPDATEs are therefore additionally anchored on
* `export_released_at IS NOT NULL`, making them a no-op once a reopen has landed. The
* "completeness" test below exercises the real reopen→re-release worker path end-to-end; the
* sub-millisecond finalize↔flip interleave itself isn't deterministically forceable with the
* fast fixtures, so that exact window is covered by the SQL guard + code review rather than a
* timing-dependent assertion.
*
* Coverage:
* - churn integrity: rapid reopen→re-release yields exactly one INTACT ZIP, no stuck jobs.
* - completeness: an upload added during the reopen window IS present in the re-released

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import { classifyUploadStatus } from './upload-queue';
import { classifyUploadStatus, isReversibleLock, entryToQueueItem } from './upload-queue';
/**
* Regression guard for the upload-queue retry policy (H2 + M1). The bug being locked out:
@@ -40,3 +40,70 @@ describe('classifyUploadStatus', () => {
expect(classifyUploadStatus(503)).toBe('transient');
});
});
/**
* Regression guard for the reversible-lock discrimination inside the `terminal` bucket — the
* branch that decides whether a 4xx KEEPS the blob (event closed / gallery released: a host can
* reopen and the photo resumes) or PURGES it (permanent ban / quota). Getting this wrong either
* loses a photo the guest expected to survive a reopen, or lets a banned device retry forever.
*/
describe('isReversibleLock', () => {
it('an `uploads_locked` code is reversible at any status (event closed / released)', () => {
expect(isReversibleLock(403, 'uploads_locked')).toBe(true);
expect(isReversibleLock(409, 'uploads_locked')).toBe(true);
});
it('a `forbidden` 403 (banned) is PERMANENT — purge, never resume', () => {
expect(isReversibleLock(403, 'forbidden')).toBe(false);
});
it('an unidentifiable 403 (unparseable proxy/WAF/captive-portal body) is treated reversible', () => {
// Losing a photo is the worst outcome; 403 is the reversible-lock status here.
expect(isReversibleLock(403, undefined)).toBe(true);
expect(isReversibleLock(403, null)).toBe(true);
expect(isReversibleLock(403, '')).toBe(true);
});
it('a non-403 permanent 4xx (e.g. 413 quota) is NOT reversible unless explicitly locked', () => {
expect(isReversibleLock(413, undefined)).toBe(false);
expect(isReversibleLock(400, 'bad_request')).toBe(false);
expect(isReversibleLock(413, 'uploads_locked')).toBe(true); // explicit tag still wins
});
});
/**
* Regression guard for the queue-rehydration mapping. The bug this locks out: `loadQueue`
* rebuilt items from IndexedDB WITHOUT copying `lastModified`, so a reloaded item had
* `lastModified === undefined`. addToQueue's dedup keys on (name, size, lastModified), so
* re-selecting the same file after a reload would MISS the duplicate and queue it twice.
*/
describe('entryToQueueItem', () => {
const base = {
id: 'e1',
userId: 'u1',
fileName: 'photo.jpg',
fileSize: 1234,
lastModified: 1_700_000_000_000,
mimeType: 'image/jpeg',
status: 'pending' as const
};
it('carries lastModified across rehydration (dedup depends on it)', () => {
expect(entryToQueueItem(base).lastModified).toBe(1_700_000_000_000);
});
it('downgrades an interrupted `uploading` entry to `pending` so it resumes', () => {
expect(entryToQueueItem({ ...base, status: 'uploading' }).status).toBe('pending');
});
it('a `done` entry reports 100% progress; others start at 0', () => {
expect(entryToQueueItem({ ...base, status: 'done' }).progress).toBe(100);
expect(entryToQueueItem(base).progress).toBe(0);
});
it('defaults caption/hashtags to empty strings', () => {
const item = entryToQueueItem(base);
expect(item.caption).toBe('');
expect(item.hashtags).toBe('');
});
});

View File

@@ -211,6 +211,57 @@ export function classifyUploadStatus(status: number): UploadOutcome {
return 'transient';
}
/**
* Within the `terminal` bucket, decide whether a 4xx is a REVERSIBLE lock (keep the blob,
* park retryable for a host reopen) rather than a permanent rejection (purge the blob).
* Pure + exported so this data-loss-critical rule is unit-testable without an XHR harness.
*
* Reversible when:
* - the backend tagged it `uploads_locked` (event closed / gallery released — a host can reopen), OR
* - it's ANY 403 we can't positively identify as a permanent ban (`forbidden`). An unparseable
* 403 body (proxy/WAF/captive portal) must NOT purge the blob — losing a photo is the worst
* outcome, and 403 is the reversible-lock status here.
* A `forbidden` 403 (banned) and every non-403 4xx (e.g. 413 quota) are permanent → purge.
*/
export function isReversibleLock(status: number, errorCode: unknown): boolean {
return errorCode === 'uploads_locked' || (status === 403 && errorCode !== 'forbidden');
}
/**
* Rehydrate a persisted IndexedDB entry into an in-memory `QueueItem`. Pure + exported so the
* field-mapping is unit-testable. The rule that must not regress: `lastModified` MUST be carried
* across — addToQueue's dedup keys on it, so an item restored from IndexedDB (page reload / PWA
* relaunch) with an undefined lastModified would fail to match a re-selection of the same file
* and silently queue it twice. `uploading` is downgraded to `pending` (an interrupted in-flight
* upload must resume, not stay stuck spinning).
*/
export function entryToQueueItem(entry: {
id: string;
userId: string;
fileName: string;
fileSize: number;
lastModified?: number;
mimeType: string;
caption?: string;
hashtags?: string;
status: QueueItem['status'] | 'uploading';
error?: string;
}): QueueItem {
return {
id: entry.id,
userId: entry.userId,
fileName: entry.fileName,
fileSize: entry.fileSize,
lastModified: entry.lastModified,
mimeType: entry.mimeType,
caption: entry.caption ?? '',
hashtags: entry.hashtags ?? '',
status: entry.status === 'uploading' ? 'pending' : entry.status,
progress: entry.status === 'done' ? 100 : 0,
error: entry.error
};
}
export async function loadQueue(): Promise<void> {
const database = await getDb();
const myUserId = getUserId();
@@ -220,18 +271,7 @@ export async function loadQueue(): Promise<void> {
// explicit logout via `clearQueue`).
const items: QueueItem[] = all
.filter((entry) => entry.userId && entry.userId === myUserId)
.map((entry) => ({
id: entry.id,
userId: entry.userId,
fileName: entry.fileName,
fileSize: entry.fileSize,
mimeType: entry.mimeType,
caption: entry.caption ?? '',
hashtags: entry.hashtags ?? '',
status: entry.status === 'uploading' ? 'pending' : entry.status,
progress: entry.status === 'done' ? 100 : 0,
error: entry.error
}));
.map(entryToQueueItem);
queueItems.set(items);
// Staged-but-unsent items from a prior session (queued offline, tab closed before
// reconnect) must resume now — otherwise the "queue flushes when you're back online"
@@ -501,10 +541,7 @@ async function uploadItem(id: string): Promise<void> {
// = banned) as reversible: an unparseable 403 body (proxy/WAF/captive
// portal) must NOT purge the blob — losing a photo is the worst outcome, and
// 403 is the reversible-lock status here.
if (
body?.error === 'uploads_locked' ||
(xhr.status === 403 && body?.error !== 'forbidden')
) {
if (isReversibleLock(xhr.status, body?.error)) {
reject(new LockedError(body?.message || 'Event ist geschlossen.'));
break;
}

View File

@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@
showBottomNav.set(true);
clearTimer();
if (overlayHideTimer) clearTimeout(overlayHideTimer);
if (processedDebounce) clearTimeout(processedDebounce);
void releaseWakeLock();
for (const unsub of unsubs) unsub();
});