An audit found tests that pass on broken code. The dominant pattern: fire a security
assertion at the all-zeros UUID and accept [403, 404] — the 404 comes from the resource
LOOKUP, not the guard, so the guard can be deleted and the test still passes. Repaired to
use real resources and demand exactly 403:
- banned-user cannot like / comment (the only coverage of those ban invariants)
- host cannot promote a real guest (or self) to admin — asserts nobody's role changed
- IDOR comment-delete already used a real resource; kept
Also inverted recovery.spec's "unknown name → nicht gefunden" test: that asserted the exact
account-enumeration oracle the F4 fix removed, so restoring the vuln would have made it
pass. Now: an unknown name must be byte-identical to a wrong PIN.
New coverage for paths that ran in production but in zero tests:
- quota.spec.ts: storage quota enforcement (413 over-limit, atomic increment under two
uploads held mid-body so both carry a stale total=0 — the real race; a naive Promise.all
version was itself vacuous and is documented as such). Proven to fail without the guard.
- authz-sweep.spec.ts: table-driven guest→403 / host→403 over ALL 19 privileged routes +
anonymous + __truncate. No live hole found; the whole surface is now locked.
- ban / unban / host-comment-delete AFTER release regenerate the keepsake (data-loss
paths that were dead under test); comment-delete mid-build doesn't strand the ZIP.
Lower-severity de-vacuuming: 10 MB comment test hit Caddy's 502 before the real 500-char
cap (now seeds a real upload, 501→400 / 500→201, mutation-verified); XSS name payloads
shortened under the 50-char cap so they actually store+render; ui-rendering XSS test now
proves the payload rendered before asserting no <b>; export page-object locators fixed to
the real "Download" label with a positive empty-state anchor; avatar palette spread test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
130 lines
6.9 KiB
TypeScript
130 lines
6.9 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Table-driven privilege sweep over EVERY host- and admin-gated route.
|
|
*
|
|
* Before this file, exactly THREE authorization assertions existed in the whole suite (guest →
|
|
* /host/event/close, guest → GET /admin/config, host → GET /admin/config). Sixteen of nineteen
|
|
* privileged routes had no test proving a guest is turned away — including:
|
|
*
|
|
* POST /host/users/{id}/pin-reset → reset any guest's PIN, then log in as them via /recover.
|
|
* That is account takeover, and nothing guarded it.
|
|
* DELETE /host/upload/{id} → delete any guest's photo (unrecoverable after the party).
|
|
* POST /host/event/open → retire the released keepsake and reopen uploads to everyone.
|
|
* PATCH /admin/config → only GET was 403-tested; a guest WRITING config could
|
|
* disable quotas and rate limits outright.
|
|
*
|
|
* The point of a table is that adding a route to the router and forgetting to protect it should
|
|
* make a test fail. So this asserts the WHOLE privileged surface, not a sample of it.
|
|
*
|
|
* Deliberately NOT covered here: the read-only-ban model (a banned user keeps read access and can
|
|
* still download the keepsake) is BY DESIGN, and is asserted in 07-adversarial/authorization-deep.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { test, expect } from '../../fixtures/test';
|
|
|
|
const BASE = process.env.E2E_FRONTEND_URL ?? 'http://localhost:3101';
|
|
|
|
type Method = 'GET' | 'POST' | 'PATCH' | 'DELETE';
|
|
interface Route {
|
|
method: Method;
|
|
path: (victimId: string) => string;
|
|
name: string;
|
|
body?: unknown;
|
|
/** admin-only routes must also reject a HOST, not just a guest. */
|
|
adminOnly?: boolean;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const ROUTES: Route[] = [
|
|
// ── Host surface ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
{ method: 'GET', path: () => '/api/v1/host/event', name: 'GET /host/event' },
|
|
{ method: 'POST', path: () => '/api/v1/host/event/close', name: 'POST /host/event/close' },
|
|
{ method: 'POST', path: () => '/api/v1/host/event/open', name: 'POST /host/event/open' },
|
|
{ method: 'POST', path: () => '/api/v1/host/gallery/release', name: 'POST /host/gallery/release' },
|
|
{ method: 'POST', path: () => '/api/v1/host/export/rebuild', name: 'POST /host/export/rebuild' },
|
|
{ method: 'GET', path: () => '/api/v1/host/users', name: 'GET /host/users' },
|
|
{ method: 'POST', path: (v) => `/api/v1/host/users/${v}/ban`, name: 'POST /host/users/{id}/ban', body: {} },
|
|
{ method: 'POST', path: (v) => `/api/v1/host/users/${v}/unban`, name: 'POST /host/users/{id}/unban', body: {} },
|
|
{ method: 'PATCH', path: (v) => `/api/v1/host/users/${v}/role`, name: 'PATCH /host/users/{id}/role', body: { role: 'host' } },
|
|
{ method: 'POST', path: (v) => `/api/v1/host/users/${v}/pin-reset`, name: 'POST /host/users/{id}/pin-reset', body: {} },
|
|
{ method: 'GET', path: () => '/api/v1/host/pin-reset-requests', name: 'GET /host/pin-reset-requests' },
|
|
{ method: 'DELETE', path: (v) => `/api/v1/host/pin-reset-requests/${v}`, name: 'DELETE /host/pin-reset-requests/{id}' },
|
|
{ method: 'DELETE', path: (v) => `/api/v1/host/upload/${v}`, name: 'DELETE /host/upload/{id}' },
|
|
{ method: 'DELETE', path: (v) => `/api/v1/host/comment/${v}`, name: 'DELETE /host/comment/{id}' },
|
|
|
|
// ── Admin surface ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
{ method: 'GET', path: () => '/api/v1/admin/stats', name: 'GET /admin/stats', adminOnly: true },
|
|
{ method: 'GET', path: () => '/api/v1/admin/config', name: 'GET /admin/config', adminOnly: true },
|
|
{ method: 'PATCH', path: () => '/api/v1/admin/config', name: 'PATCH /admin/config', adminOnly: true, body: { quota_enabled: 'false' } },
|
|
{ method: 'GET', path: () => '/api/v1/admin/export/jobs', name: 'GET /admin/export/jobs', adminOnly: true },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
async function call(route: Route, jwt: string, victimId: string): Promise<number> {
|
|
const res = await fetch(BASE + route.path(victimId), {
|
|
method: route.method,
|
|
headers: {
|
|
Authorization: `Bearer ${jwt}`,
|
|
...(route.body !== undefined ? { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } : {}),
|
|
},
|
|
...(route.body !== undefined ? { body: JSON.stringify(route.body) } : {}),
|
|
});
|
|
return res.status;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test.describe('Authorization sweep — every privileged route', () => {
|
|
for (const route of ROUTES) {
|
|
test(`a GUEST is refused: ${route.name}`, async ({ guest }) => {
|
|
const attacker = await guest('AuthzAttacker');
|
|
const victim = await guest('AuthzVictim');
|
|
|
|
const status = await call(route, attacker.jwt, victim.userId);
|
|
|
|
// 403 exactly. NOT "some 4xx" — a 404 would mean the request got past the role gate and
|
|
// merely failed to find the resource, which is precisely the vacuity this suite has been
|
|
// bitten by: it would still pass with the RequireHost/RequireAdmin extractor deleted.
|
|
expect(status, `${route.name} must reject a guest with 403, got ${status}`).toBe(403);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const route of ROUTES.filter((r) => r.adminOnly)) {
|
|
test(`a HOST is refused: ${route.name}`, async ({ host, guest }) => {
|
|
const victim = await guest('AuthzVictim');
|
|
|
|
const status = await call(route, host.jwt, victim.userId);
|
|
|
|
expect(status, `${route.name} is admin-only and must reject a host with 403, got ${status}`).toBe(403);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The truncate endpoint wipes every table AND the media directory. It is test-mode only, but it
|
|
// is reachable over HTTP and gated solely by RequireAdmin — so it deserves the same proof.
|
|
test('a GUEST is refused: POST /admin/__truncate (wipes the whole event)', async ({ guest }) => {
|
|
const attacker = await guest('TruncateAttacker');
|
|
const res = await fetch(`${BASE}/api/v1/admin/__truncate`, {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${attacker.jwt}` },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a HOST is refused: POST /admin/__truncate', async ({ host }) => {
|
|
const res = await fetch(`${BASE}/api/v1/admin/__truncate`, {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${host.jwt}` },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// An unauthenticated caller must not get further than an authenticated-but-unprivileged one.
|
|
test('an ANONYMOUS caller is refused every privileged route', async () => {
|
|
const victim = '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000';
|
|
for (const route of ROUTES) {
|
|
const res = await fetch(BASE + route.path(victim), {
|
|
method: route.method,
|
|
headers: route.body !== undefined ? { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } : {},
|
|
...(route.body !== undefined ? { body: JSON.stringify(route.body) } : {}),
|
|
});
|
|
expect([401, 403], `${route.name} must reject an anonymous caller, got ${res.status}`).toContain(
|
|
res.status
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|