The reworked artifact made every Korean word on the lesson screen a way in
to the dictionary, in three tiers. This ports them.
1. The underline. Every Korean run in a message, a gloss or an exercise is
a button whose underline says what the word is to him: amber new, blue
learning, jade in review, faint when secure or merely explainable,
dotted when nothing knows it. A form carries its dictionary word's state
— 갔어 is 가다's — through the one resolver the gate uses
(domain/words.ts). The artifact gave "in review" no colour at all.
2. The popover, beside the word: the meaning, "+ Add to deck" (the
dictionary entry, so 먹었어 adds 먹다), "Ask 선생님" for a word he was
shown without being taught, a search, the word list. English on an
exercise's English side opens its Korean, from an index of the course's
own material — never the frequency bands, whose thousands of glosses
would bury the answer. An answer chip's tap belongs to the exercise, so
a 420ms hold glosses it, or a tap with 힌트 on; the hold's click is
swallowed before the exercise sees it. Pressing a word never takes focus
from the answer being typed, and the popover no longer closes when the
window resizes — on a phone that was the keyboard moving.
3. The word list gains + / ✓ on every row, search results included.
Every lookup, whichever tier, goes into the answer's "I had to look up"
and the peek tally — counted under the Korean looked at; the artifact
counted an English lookup under the English word.
A dictionary word added this way is studied: a card on an entry outside
the curated sources now counts as a deck word, in review and in "my
units". Before, it got a card that no review would ever show.
The word list glosses through the same resolver as the popover and the
gate, rather than the surface table alone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
ab9b75ff32