feat(suppress): author + persist per-app template suppressions (§11 tail S2)

The declarative half — a `[suppress]` block persists as markers; no runtime
effect yet (S3 consumes them).

- manifest: `[suppress]` table on an app with `triggers = [...]` (handler
  script names) + `routes = [...]` (paths), `deny_unknown_fields`; rejected
  on a `[group]` (a group just wouldn't declare the template).
- suppression_repo.rs: app-keyed `list_for_app` / `insert` / `delete_tx`
  over `(app_id, target_kind, reference)`, mirroring extension_point_repo
  minus the owner polymorphism.
- apply_service: the extension-point marker-reconcile pattern —
  `Bundle.suppress_triggers/_routes`, `Plan.suppressions`,
  `CurrentState.suppressions`, `load_current(App)` load, `diff_suppressions`
  (key `"{kind}:{reference}"`, split on the first `:` so a route param path
  survives), create + prune reconcile blocks, `validate_bundle_for` group
  reject, `ApplyReport` counters.
- CLI: `build_bundle` carries the two vecs; `pic plan` + apply report gain a
  suppressions row (DTOs + display).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

crates/picloud-cli/src/cmds/pull.rs

@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ pub async fn run(app_ident: &str, dir: &Path, force: bool, mode: OutputMode) ->
             names: secrets.iter().map(|s| s.name.clone()).collect(),
         },
         vars: manifest_vars,
+        suppress: crate::manifest::ManifestSuppress::default(),
     };
 
     std::fs::write(&manifest_path, manifest.to_toml()?)