Two review findings.
1. Per-app opt-out changes the group-template guarantee from "runs on every
descendant" to "runs unless the descendant declines" — a footgun for
compliance hooks (an audit/security trigger a tenant can silently opt out
of). There is no non-suppressible flag. Document this in design §4.5 +
CLAUDE.md, and record the deferred mitigation: a `sealed`/`mandatory`
group-template marker the trigger anti-join + route filter skip (cheap —
both filters are centralized).
2. The dangling-suppress warning path had no coverage. The suppress journey
now applies a `[suppress] triggers=["does-not-exist"]`, asserts the apply
still succeeds and the report warns "no effect".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Journey tests/suppress.rs: a group declares a `[[routes]]` template; a
descendant app applies `[suppress] routes=["/ghello"]` → stops serving it
(via `routes match`), a sibling still serves it, `pic suppress ls --app`
shows it, re-apply is a NoOp; pruning the block re-inherits. The
trigger-side filter + isolation are pinned at the repo layer by
template_suppression.rs.
- Docs: design §4.5 (per-app opt-out closing the deferred gap for both
templates — coarse-by-reference, inheritance-only, the two consumption
points; group-level suppress still deferred), CLAUDE.md current-focus.
Full journey suite 121/121; workspace tests 34 suites/0 failures.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
