The groups/project-tool work had no home in the blueprint's version
scheme, two "Phase N" numbering schemes overlapped, and CLAUDE.md's
"current focus" was stale (claimed v1.1.0 SDK foundation; we're at v1.1.9
with the SDK line complete). Reconcile all three:
* blueprint §12 Phase 5 (v1.2, already titled "Advanced Workflows &
Hierarchies") — split into a Hierarchies track (the groups + project
tool initiative, with §11 Phases 1–3 marked shipped) and a Workflows
track, with sequencing flagged as an open call. This gives the work an
explicit version home: the Hierarchies half of v1.2.
* design doc header — Status Draft → Active, "scheduled as the Hierarchies
track of v1.2", and an explicit warning that §11's local Phase 1–6
numbering is distinct from the blueprint product-phase numbering.
* design doc §11.1 — a post-Phase-3 re-sequencing review: resolve Phase 4
scripts LIVE (drop the fan-out-invalidation sub-project, per the Phase 3
result); consider a "Phase 5-lite" (declarative apply of vars/secrets +
app scripts) before the hard group-scripts work; and force the two
deferred decisions (trigger/route templates vs tenant cardinality;
multi-repo ownership vs a single-repo start).
* CLAUDE.md — refresh "current focus" to v1.2 Hierarchies, and correct the
now-broken "every v1.1+ table is app_id NOT NULL" invariant: the new
group-inheritable config tables (vars, secrets) use a polymorphic owner
(group_id XOR app_id), not app_id NOT NULL.
Doc-only; no code change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Phase 3 (group-inherited config) is implemented, so fold the outcome back
into the design doc (per its own "before it drifts" note) — and flag the
one deliberate divergence from the plan.
§5.1 / §11.3 / §12 prescribed a *materialized* per-app effective view with
a generation counter and fan-out invalidation. We shipped **live,
resolve-on-read inheritance** instead: one recursive CTE per
`vars::get`/`secrets::get`/`config/effective`, no cache. The org tree is
small and there was no pre-existing config cache to fight, so this is
cheap and sidesteps §10's unsolved invalidation SLA.
Records, mirroring the Phase 1/2 status blocks:
* a "Status (Phase 3): ✅ shipped" block in §11.3 with the full surface
(0048/0049 schema incl. `apps.environment`, the §3 resolver, vars SDK +
CRUD, group-secret AAD + inherited read, the two secret gates, masked
`config/effective`, `--explain`) and the live-vs-materialized rationale;
* §5.1 runtime-model bullet annotated as the deferred (Phase-4 script
inheritance) design, not Phase-3 runtime;
* §10 "invalidation SLA" and "inherited-membership revocation lag" marked
moot/resolved — no cache means immediate propagation;
* §12 resolver contract + the header framing updated to live resolution.
Doc-only; no code change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Update §4.3: the fire-time `enabled` re-check is shipped and test-backed on
BOTH async arms (the unified outbox `!resolved.active` gate and the queue
arm's fresh-script nack), with the specific regression tests cited, plus the
same-app backstop now present on every async build path.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fold the implementation outcome back into the project-tool spec (§11) as
the design asks. Records what landed (init/pull/config/plan/apply/prune,
env overlays, enabled lifecycle, trigger name+backfill, content-fingerprint
bound-plan, apply lock) and the deliberate deferrals: tree-structure
version → groups; vars/--explain → Phase 3; trigger upsert-by-name + the
dashboard enabled toggle → tracked follow-ups beyond the §11 bullets.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The architecture spec for the full vision — a declarative project tool
(picloud.toml + pull/plan/apply/prune) and a server-side nested-groups
hierarchy with live-resolve inheritance. Reviewed across several passes
for consistency, gaps, and contradictions; resolutions are folded in
beside the topics they settle.
This commit lands the spec only. The first slice of implementation (the
single-app reconcile foundation) follows; groups, env-scoping, and the
`enabled` toggle are later milestones called out in the doc.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
