diff --git a/docs/port/HANDOFF.md b/docs/port/HANDOFF.md
index 2ae05741..95ee6b6b 100644
--- a/docs/port/HANDOFF.md
+++ b/docs/port/HANDOFF.md
@@ -109,6 +109,12 @@ authored version can be deleted.
   test is to blend bit-`0x02` sprites additively and re-correlate the title
   against the capture. Note `ptlogo_back2eff` is `0x8830` despite its name, so
   this is a field and not a naming pattern. ❔ Not diagnosed.
+  ⚠️ **Read the correction below before using this.** The rotated draw was
+  identified as the swoosh by elimination and that identification is **refuted** —
+  its quads span y −209…925 in screen space, the swoosh is a band at y 126…360.
+  What stands: the game *does* submit rotated parallelograms this compositor
+  cannot draw, and vertex colours are white. What does not: which element they
+  belong to.
   ✅ **SOLVED 2026-08-28 by draw capture — it is the GEOMETRY.** The game submits
   the swoosh as **two rotated parallelograms** (edges `(0.54,−0.56)` and
   `(0.44,0.79)`, ~45° and ~61°, extending to `y=±1.81` NDC).
diff --git a/docs/re/METHOD.md b/docs/re/METHOD.md
index 9b82d849..ca1d059b 100644
--- a/docs/re/METHOD.md
+++ b/docs/re/METHOD.md
@@ -310,3 +310,10 @@ agent's loop prompt, i.e. nowhere durable. See [`README.md`](README.md) for the
   next route "because it reads the blend state". It does not — checking the
   capture's own source showed it records textures and vertex attributes and no
   blend registers. A named next step is a claim like any other.
+* **Name the element from the draw's own coordinates before building on it.** A
+  skewed draw in a title capture was called "the swoosh" because the swoosh is the
+  screen's only diagonal element — an identification by elimination, never checked
+  against the draw's NDC extent. It was wrong: the quads span the full screen and
+  beyond, the swoosh is a 234-pixel band. Five iterations of analysis pointed at
+  the wrong element on the strength of it. Converting the coordinates takes one
+  line and should come first.
diff --git a/docs/re/REFUTED.md b/docs/re/REFUTED.md
index ebbe959a..fadea3c0 100644
--- a/docs/re/REFUTED.md
+++ b/docs/re/REFUTED.md
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ neighbourhood, not just the line.
 
 ## Screens, classes and RTTI
 
+* "the rotated draw in the title's capture is the `Z` swoosh
+  (`ptlogo_back2*`)" → **mine, and refuted.** Its quads span y −209…925 and
+  −292…1012 in screen space; the swoosh is a band at y 126…360.
+  [`ui-title-build-map.md`](ui-title-build-map.md)
 * "the keyframe words at `+4`/`+8`/`+12` are always zero" → they are non-zero in
   4.81 %, 4.56 % and 15.82 % of 72 287 blocks disc-wide, reading as **degrees**
   (±180, ±90, 120). The original note was a sample artefact.
diff --git a/docs/re/ui-title-build-map.md b/docs/re/ui-title-build-map.md
index 3c9afee2..90aa9618 100644
--- a/docs/re/ui-title-build-map.md
+++ b/docs/re/ui-title-build-map.md
@@ -673,4 +673,39 @@ unidentified.
 swoosh. It is the only skewed geometry in the capture and the swoosh is the only
 diagonal element on the screen, so the inference is reasonable — but it was not
 confirmed by matching the draw's texture or screen position to that element, and
-should be.
\ No newline at end of file
+should be.
+
+## 🔴 The skewed draw is NOT the swoosh — my identification was wrong
+
+Converting draw 2's quads from NDC to screen space settles it:
+
+| quad | screen corners | bbox |
+|---|---|---|
+| A | (1088,−209) (1434,−7) (896,925) (550,727) | x 550…1434, **y −209…925** |
+| B | (−186,−7) (96,−292) (1120,727) (838,1012) | x −186…1120, **y −292…1012** |
+
+These span the **full screen height and well beyond it**. The swoosh
+(`ptlogo_back2`, rest `(71,126)`, 1118 × 262) is a **band** at y 126…360. Draw 2
+is not it.
+
+🟡 **A candidate, offered as one:** the two `ptloop` sweeps. `pteff03a.t32` is
+399 × 180 and its element carries scale **`(100,800)`** — 399 × 1440 — while
+`pteff03` carries `(100,600)`. Two long thin sprites, two quads, and the drawn
+vertex alphas `0xC3`/`0xB6` sit inside the `0x80`→`0xff` ramp those records
+declare. **Not confirmed** — no texture or position match was made.
+
+⚠️ **If** that is right it has a consequence worth flagging: our renderer parks
+those sweeps at their final keyframe (`x = 1521` and `−839`, both off-screen) and
+draws nothing, while the game draws them across the screen — which would mean the
+draw capture caught them **mid-sweep**, inside the `t = 150…600` window, and that
+the "groups hold" reading needs re-examining for these two elements specifically.
+Conditional on an unconfirmed identification, so recorded and not acted on.
+
+### What this costs
+
+Five iterations of swoosh work — the additive-blend test, the pivot analysis, the
+vertex-colour capture — were built on "the skewed draw is the swoosh", an
+identification made by *elimination on one screen* and never checked against the
+draw's own coordinates. The eliminations themselves stand (they were measured
+against the capture, not against the identification), but the chain of reasoning
+that pointed at `ptlogo_back2*` did not.
\ No newline at end of file