re: all 277 base-solver rows classified objectively; 53 are data-table schemas

name_block_bases.py extended with a per-row data-table test; artefact +57/-0,
byte-identical across two runs (now ~2 min 12 s -- it adds a disc-wide pak scan).

The test is objective, not by eye: a row is a data-table schema if its names are
IDXD record/field names on the disc (13450 such names disc-wide).  53 of 277 rows
are >=50 % disc names with >=8 names; the other 224 are engine/XDK vocabulary,
compiled key lists, or noise.

The two axes are independent: against base confidence, solved bases split 34
table / 136 not, round bases 16 / 91.  "Round base" and "not a table" are
different questions.

The 53 contain every loader already known -- that is the control.  Five rows in
the 53 are unowned, each noun grepped and appearing in no docs/re/ file:
sub_823BDAA8 r11 (33) = the S16 boss's muzzle/attach frames (GN_MainGun_*_Muz*);
sub_823BDAA8 r10 (25) = motion names (Motion_stand, Motion_attackA_start), the
EnumMotions family DefTables declares; sub_82315AE8 r11 (20) = the Guardian
record's own fields, i.e. the S16 boss loader; sub_8219E560 r11 (18) = the
leaderboard screen keys; sub_825F2CF0 + sub_825F2F88 r0 (30 each, same base) =
post-processing (FinalPassBG, FogMin/MaxDistance).

Four rows that look new are not, and their disc-overlap says so -- 53-70 % rather
than ~100 %, because they mix arsenal fields the corpus owns (ConditionToDevelop,
WeaponDesc, SilhouetteModel) with literal screen coordinates as strings.

Not settled: none of the five was opened -- this iteration produced the shortlist,
not the findings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
This commit is contained in:
Claude (auto)
2026-08-27 23:09:57 +00:00
parent 005023987e
commit 187b10418e
4 changed files with 177 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -295,6 +295,63 @@
0x82060000 x1 rows
⚠ the 0x820B0000 cluster is ~60 near-identical functions in 0x8281xxxx-0x8284xxxx that all name the same `rou_e0NN` list.
## Is the row a DATA-TABLE schema? (names that are IDXD record/field names on the disc)
distinct IDXD record+field names disc-wide: 13450
rows that are >=50% disc names and >=8 names: 53 / 277
sub_82341A20 r30 0x82088F94 217 names 89% disc
sub_822215D0 r11 0x820A0000 205 names 98% disc
sub_8230D1F8 r29 0x8209FD28 129 names 97% disc
sub_82338EE0 r30 0x8208583C 97 names 94% disc
sub_822F9498 r29 0x8209FD28 90 names 99% disc
sub_822AE628 r11 0x820B0000 81 names 67% disc
sub_823BDAA8 r11 0x820B0000 33 names 88% disc
sub_82561C70 r11 0x820A90D8 30 names 50% disc
sub_825F2CF0 r0 0x8209EB30 30 names 97% disc
sub_825F2F88 r0 0x8209EB30 30 names 97% disc
sub_82297550 r11 0x820B0000 27 names 67% disc
sub_822A2F00 r11 0x820B0000 27 names 70% disc
sub_823BDAA8 r10 0x820B0000 25 names 100% disc
sub_822215D0 r10 0x820A0000 24 names 75% disc
sub_822814D8 r11 0x820B0000 24 names 100% disc
sub_8230D1F8 r28 0x820978AC 24 names 96% disc
sub_8247DFC0 r31 0x8209E690 23 names 96% disc
sub_821A6CF0 r29 0x820A1630 22 names 100% disc
sub_8227A3A0 r11 0x820B0000 21 names 100% disc
sub_82315AE8 r11 0x820B0000 21 names 90% disc
sub_8233C368 r28 0x8208583C 20 names 100% disc
sub_8236B608 r11 0x820B0000 20 names 100% disc
sub_8221F700 r31 0x820A0E9C 19 names 100% disc
sub_82288028 r11 0x820B0000 19 names 53% disc
sub_822A9C18 r11 0x820B0000 19 names 89% disc
sub_8219E560 r11 0x820A0000 18 names 100% disc
sub_82261F70 r31 0x82086C1C 18 names 89% disc
sub_82286BC8 r11 0x820B0000 18 names 100% disc
sub_821AA1B0 r31 0x820A97CC 16 names 94% disc
sub_82804AD0 r11 0x820A792C 16 names 88% disc
sub_82222E70 r0 0x8209E6D8 15 names 100% disc
sub_8227F8E0 r31 0x820A0E9C 15 names 100% disc
sub_82282DB0 r31 0x820A0E8C 15 names 100% disc
sub_823479B8 r28 0x820864F4 15 names 100% disc
sub_82565C80 r11 0x820A5574 15 names 87% disc
sub_825DA790 r26 0x820A3B4C 15 names 93% disc
sub_8220ED30 r31 0x820A0E9C 14 names 100% disc
sub_8221F700 r11 0x820A0000 14 names 86% disc
sub_822F2E58 r31 0x820A97E4 14 names 100% disc
sub_82338EE0 r11 0x820AA368 14 names 100% disc
sub_823B2620 r31 0x8209E710 14 names 93% disc
sub_825635C8 r31 0x8209E230 14 names 100% disc
sub_8261F2C0 r11 0x8208AB54 14 names 86% disc
sub_8229F018 r11 0x820A4818 13 names 100% disc
sub_823785A0 r31 0x8209E710 13 names 92% disc
sub_8237BB78 r31 0x820AFDA0 13 names 100% disc
sub_824E76D0 r10 0x8209FC64 13 names 92% disc
sub_82193648 r11 0x820A8278 12 names 83% disc
sub_82220FA8 r31 0x820A0E8C 12 names 100% disc
sub_822C7480 r31 0x8209E6D4 12 names 100% disc
sub_82320B48 r10 0x820B0000 12 names 100% disc
sub_823276D0 r31 0x820A97EC 12 names 100% disc
sub_826FA758 r11 0x820A81F0 12 names 92% disc
## The schema each one names, in code order
sub_82341A20 (r30, base 0x82088F94) names 217: