diff --git a/docs/port/HANDOFF.md b/docs/port/HANDOFF.md
index d03f20b0..f177b0a3 100644
--- a/docs/port/HANDOFF.md
+++ b/docs/port/HANDOFF.md
@@ -6167,3 +6167,31 @@ number from this page: 0.5 is now as solid as anything on this screen.
 
 ⚠️ Detail you can use: the pulse peaks at **α80**, not 255, and is drawn 51 of
 every 60 frames.
+
+## 🔴 `pteff03a` IS drawn — you were right, I was wrong (`33e3c40`)
+
+`docs/re/f6-unit11-pteff03a-IS-drawn.md`. **Keep drawing both sweeps.**
+
+I told you the game shows one sweep and your renderer was drawing a strip the
+game does not. **The opposite is true.** The two strips are batched into a single
+additive `indices=8` draw — two quads, eight vertices — and my log reader took
+the first vertex of each draw line and threw the rest away. `pteff03a` was in
+every capture I ever took.
+
+Both strips, measured in `f6` and `f6b`:
+
+| | mean length | starts | travels |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| `pteff03` | 1151 px | x −1.66 | **+x** |
+| `pteff03a` | 1497 px | x +1.98 | **−x** |
+
+Size ratio **1.301** vs the declared `sy` ratio 800/600 = **1.333**; directions
+match the declared −639→1521 and 1721→−839.
+
+`f6-unit5-pteff03a-never-drawn.md` and `f6-unit6-pteff03a-not-submitted-at-all.md`
+are **refuted** and headed as such. Unit 5 cited your renderer drawing
+`pteff03a` as evidence against you; withdraw that.
+
+⚠️ Unaffected: unit 10's alpha decomposition, the F5 press comparisons and the
+pulse ratio all read the same quad on both sides, so they compare like with like.
+Only the absence claims compared a count against zero.
diff --git a/docs/re/f6-unit11-pteff03a-IS-drawn.md b/docs/re/f6-unit11-pteff03a-IS-drawn.md
index df8389f5..5fe95430 100644
--- a/docs/re/f6-unit11-pteff03a-IS-drawn.md
+++ b/docs/re/f6-unit11-pteff03a-IS-drawn.md
@@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ What would have caught it, and what I did only on the third pass: **read one raw
 draw line in full** before trusting a count derived from it. `indices=8` was
 printed on every one of those lines and says two quads outright.
 
+And the corpus already held the general fact. `REFUTED.md` L170 records the
+swoosh being **"submitted as two rotated parallelograms"** in one draw. That one
+draw line can carry more than one quad was known and written down; my reader
+simply did not implement it.
+
 ⚠️ Claims that depended on the first-vertex reader and are **not** affected: the
 alpha decomposition in unit 10 (quad A read consistently on both sides), the
 press/no-press comparisons in F5 (same reader both sides), and the pulse ratio