re: menu focus does not survive a reboot -- six fresh boots, three following a session that ended elsewhere
No new boot was spent: six runs had already captured the first menu entry of a fresh boot, and all six read NEW GAME. Three of them follow a session that ended with the cursor on EXTRAS or OPTIONS, which is what makes it a test of persistence rather than a repeated observation. Reach stated rather than implied: every session ends with the emulator KILLED, so a game that writes menu state on a clean shutdown would never get the chance. This measures 'does not survive a killed session'. Refutation attempt on the port's extras/initial_focus: ptbtn11 -- it SURVIVES. ptbtn11 is the top button on the EXTRAS build, with the main menu as a control where ptbtn01 is top and is known to be NEW GAME. Incidentally corrects ring_row.py's stated calibration. It cited capture_y = 49.5 + 1.060*design_y, fitted against menu_focus.py's row centres, which are NOT the disc's button rows -- the disc says 162/242/322/401/482, spacing 80, and menu_focus.py drifts up to 17 px against them. Re-fitted: 64.82 + 0.9919*design_y, residuals under 0.7 px. No item assignment changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
This commit is contained in:
@@ -818,3 +818,22 @@ here, against the **19–20 dB** an unrelated movie gave them. A 0.66 dB thresho
|
||||
an 8× margin against that floor rather than a 30× one, so **the safety of the
|
||||
threshold depends on how different the chosen known-negative is**, not on the method.
|
||||
[data](data/impossibility-scope-sweep.txt)
|
||||
|
||||
### Refutation attempt on `sylpheed-port`'s `extras/initial_focus: ptbtn11` — ✅ SURVIVES (2026-08-31)
|
||||
|
||||
**Target:** their statement that `EXTRAS` keeps `ptbtn11` and is "correct under the
|
||||
surviving reading" — i.e. that a submenu resets to the item it opens on, and that
|
||||
`ptbtn11` is that item.
|
||||
|
||||
**My attempt:** the oracle shows `EXTRAS` opening on `MISSION SELECT`, the first of
|
||||
three. So their value is right only if `ptbtn11` is the **top** button on that
|
||||
screen. Checked against the disc, with the main menu as a control
|
||||
(`examples/extras_button_order.rs`):
|
||||
|
||||
| | buttons top to bottom |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| **control** — main menu (entry 5) | `ptbtn01` y162, `ptbtn02` y242, `ptbtn03` y322, `ptbtn04` y401, `ptbtn05` y482 → top is `ptbtn01` = `NEW GAME` ✅ |
|
||||
| `EXTRAS` (entry 6) | `ptbtn11` y282, `ptbtn12` y362, `ptbtn13` y442 → **top is `ptbtn11`** |
|
||||
|
||||
**The claim survives**, and the control confirms the ordering rule reproduces a
|
||||
screen whose answer is independently known.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user