re: my language-sprite reading is refuted, and 'EN/JP pair' is withdrawn from the DIFFICULTY row
sylpheed-port refuted the untested reading I recorded yesterday with a count, and I reproduced it: 26 of 65 adjacent GP_DIALOG pairs differ in BUTTON COUNT, which two languages of one dialog cannot. The names agree once read rather than counted -- ranking_NEXT against ranking_JUMP, py_ranking against pzeff, pzstg10 against pzstg02. So adjacent entries are unrelated dialogs, the 63 never needed the language reading, the 2 matching pairs need no special account, and the 140:70 ratio is a counting coincidence -- the same fact my halves-pairing zero was showing from the other side. Preserving their caution: this does not establish that 0/1 and 2/3 ARE language pairs. Identical element sets is equally consistent with a duplicate, and for the 37 pairs differing without a button-count mismatch the language reading is unsupported rather than refuted. Withdraws a delivered claim: I called entries 2/3 'an EN/JP pair' in HANDOFF. The DIFFICULTY identification does not rest on it -- unique geometry plus the capture does -- but it was stated as fact and was not one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
This commit is contained in:
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ delivered.
|
||||
| route | evidence |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| **image** | `0x820A41BB` lists **`DLG_SELECT_DIFFICULTY`** among the `DLG_*` dialog names, beside `DLG_MESSAGE_BOX`, `DLG_SYSTEM_PAUSE`. `GP_DIFFICULTY` appears **0** times |
|
||||
| **disc** | `GP_DIALOG` entries **2/3** are the only builds there with `pcbtn00`–`03` — four buttons at design y **259/329/399/469**, spacing **70**, an EN/JP pair |
|
||||
| **disc** | `GP_DIALOG` entries **2/3** are the only builds there with `pcbtn00`–`03` — four buttons at design y **259/329/399/469**, spacing **70**. ⚠️ ~~an EN/JP pair~~ — **withdrawn**: adjacent `GP_DIALOG` entries are generally *unrelated dialogs* (26 of 65 adjacent pairs differ in **button count**, which two languages cannot), so identical element sets here is **equally consistent with a duplicate**. The identification of the build does not rest on the pairing |
|
||||
| **oracle** | my capture of the running screen puts its four rows at 323.5/394.0/463.5/533.5 — within **4 px** of those, spacing 70.5/69.5/70.0 against the disc's 70/70/70 |
|
||||
|
||||
📌 **Two consequences for you.**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user