fabi/Sylpheed
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 9 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

re: decode the dialog table -- 70/70 records, DLG_SELECT_DIFFICULTY is id 2000

Browse Source 
Chasing the reach I recorded this morning found the binding it said was missing.
Every DLG_ string in the image is pointed at by one aligned word at a 12-byte
stride: {u32 handler, u32 id, u32 name_ptr}, spanning 0x820A0A2C..0x820A0D68 with
three distinct handlers. Complete -- 70 names, 70 records, none unmatched -- and the
ids are banded and monotonic with a single gap at 24. Read from the image directly.

Refutation attempt on the shared reach, which both agents had recorded: 'another
four-button dialog with the same rows would be indistinguishable'. Scanned every
build in every pak for four buttons within 6 px of 259/329/399/469. Control found
both incumbents; zero rivals exist anywhere on the disc. So the geometric
identification is unique disc-wide, which is stronger than what either of us
claimed.

Still unbound: id 2000 to a pak entry. The tie remains uniqueness plus the oracle
capture, not a pointer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
This commit is contained in:
sylph-decoder
2026-08-31 02:50:35 +00:00
parent 18ed2858c5
commit 5010b677c0
2 changed files with 103 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

48
docs/re/data/difficulty-is-a-dialog.txt
View File

@@ -64,3 +64,51 @@
# the DLG_* names live in a string list, and what maps a name to an archive entry
# is not decoded. Another 4-button dialog with the same rows would be
# indistinguishable by this evidence.
################################################################################
# ✅ DECODED 2026-08-31 (later): THE DIALOG TABLE. `DLG_SELECT_DIFFICULTY` = id 2000.
#
# Chasing the reach above -- "no binding from the DLG_ name to anything" -- found
# one. Every DLG_ string in the image is pointed at by exactly one aligned word,
# at a regular 12-byte stride. The table is:
#
# struct { u32 handler; u32 id; u32 name_ptr; } // 12 bytes, big-endian
#
# spanning 0x820A0A2C .. 0x820A0D68, three distinct handler values
# (0x821CFD80, 0x821D05D8, 0x821D0808).
#
# ✅ COMPLETE: 70 DLG_ names in the image, 70 records, ZERO names without one.
# ids are banded and monotonic, with a single gap at 24:
# 0..23 sign-in, storage, save/load/replay, GO_TITLE, GO_NEXT
# 25..43 autosave, training, weapon develop, custom keys, menu jumps
# 98, 99 DLG_MESSAGE_BOX_YES_NO, DLG_MESSAGE_BOX
# 1000 DLG_MISSION_OBJECTIVE
# 2000 **DLG_SELECT_DIFFICULTY**
# 2001..3 SYSTEM_PAUSE, LEADERBOARD_MENU_JUMP, LEADERBOARD_MENU_NEXT
# 2100..15 DLG_STAGE_TITLE01..16
# 8000 DLG_RATING_ESRB
# 9000..2 trial dialogs
#
# Read from /image/sylpheed.pe directly -- these are the bytes the console ran,
# not a database row.
#
################################################################################
# ✅ REFUTATION ATTEMPT ON THE SHARED REACH -- IT SURVIVES, AND IS NOW BOUNDED.
#
# Both agents recorded: "another four-button dialog with the same rows would be
# indistinguishable by this evidence". Tested by scanning EVERY build in EVERY pak
# for four buttons within 6 px of rows 259/329/399/469
# (examples/four_button_row_rivals.rs):
#
# INCUMBENT GP_DIALOG.pak entry 2 rows [259, 329, 399, 469]
# INCUMBENT GP_DIALOG.pak entry 3 rows [259, 329, 399, 469]
# control: 2 incumbents found (want 2) -- PASSED
# RIVALS ELSEWHERE ON THE DISC: **0**
#
# So the hypothetical rival does not exist here. The geometric identification is
# UNIQUE DISC-WIDE, which is a stronger statement than the one either of us
# recorded, and it was cheap to get.
#
# ⚠️ WHAT IS STILL NOT BOUND: id 2000 -> a pak entry. The table gives name -> id
# and the disc gives a unique four-button build; nothing found so far connects the
# two. The tie is uniqueness of geometry plus the oracle capture, not a pointer.