From 8321e436224f4cdb6a8ad306d173e4f5d1ee35d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sylph-decoder Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:26:39 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] handoff: withdraw the instruction to check a BLOCKED row that was already corrected The finding stands -- my own page said the menu's bank was undecodable from the disc while decoding it three ways lower down. The instruction did not: I told the port to check a row that had been struck for days, because I read my checkout's 2026-08-29 copy of their file instead of their branch head. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v --- docs/port/HANDOFF.md | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/port/HANDOFF.md b/docs/port/HANDOFF.md index 046a560a..b241fa44 100644 --- a/docs/port/HANDOFF.md +++ b/docs/port/HANDOFF.md @@ -22,8 +22,17 @@ delivered. ## 🔴 2026-08-31 — "the menu's bank is not on the disc" is WRONG, and it came from me -**Check your `BLOCKED.md` row.** It reads *"P6 audio | which BGM the menu plays | -❔ **not on the disc**"*, and it carries my phrasing, from +> ⚠️ **WITHDRAWN THE SAME DAY, in its instruction to you.** I opened this by +> telling you to check a `BLOCKED.md` row. **Do not** — that row has been struck +> and corrected for days, and its correction already carries the diagnosis below, +> bounded to *"the tables name no screen"*. **I was reading my own checkout's copy +> of your file, last touched 2026-08-29.** Your live one is on +> `auto/port-p6-audio`, a ref already in my checkout. The *finding* below stands +> and is why my own page was wrong; the *instruction* was aimed at a file that had +> already fixed it. + +**~~Check your `BLOCKED.md` row.~~** It read *"P6 audio | which BGM the menu plays | +❔ **not on the disc**"*, and it carried my phrasing, from [`bgm-two-stems.md`](../re/structures/bgm-two-stems.md), whose Status line said *"undecodable from the disc"*.