re: derive UNIT_ARG from the implementations -- 31 built-ins take a unit, not 31 of 55
isl.py's UNIT_ARG decides whether a built-in's slot-4 operand prints as a unit name or a raw number. It was inferred statistically from operand ranges and, by its own comment, listed a slot "only when the ratio stayed below 1.0" -- conservative. The vtable base makes it a lookup instead: every unit-taking built-in's implementation opens with lwz 324(phase) / lwz 4(argbase) / rlwinm 2,0,29 / lwzx / lwz 4(rec). Read directly for all 147: implementation indexes [phase+324] by an argument 55 of the statistical set's 31, confirmed 31 (zero false positives) UNIT_ARG claims a unit, implementation does not 0 implementation says unit, UNIT_ARG missed it 24 The 24 include builtin80, group_ratio_pct, is_engaged, set_unit_flags, squadron_trace, wait_units_ready and deploy_and_wait. Hand-verified by reading builtin7, 16, 80, 105, 117 and 136. Recorded because it nearly passed: my FIRST control -- whether the additions' operands resolve to a symbol-table-2 index -- is worthless. The additions score 100.0%, but so do the 31 baseline (100.0%) AND the 92 built-ins in neither set (99.3%). Symtab 2 is dense enough that almost any small integer lands in it. A control the negative class also passes is not evidence. The control that discriminates is the tag word: a symbol operand is a two-word pair whose first word is the constant 1, so slot0 == 1 exactly when slot 4 is a unit -- 100.0% (13677 calls) / 100.0% (140) / 2.5% (2903). A 40x separation. Artefacts: isl-stage02.txt and -phase-ends.txt regenerate byte-identical; -conditions changes on 28 sites, every diff line pairing, each a raw number becoming a unit name. Left unnamed on purpose: all 24. builtin80 returns a small enum (tested 0..4 in a switch) but its body past the liveness check is unread; builtin103 is a predicate over [phase+10152]/[phase+10156]; builtin105 tests a unit record's +16 against 4.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -178,8 +178,22 @@ def symbols(b, which):
|
||||
# spread tests but its maximum EXCEEDS the table (flag indices run 0..31 against
|
||||
# tables as small as 40), so it is excluded. Slots are only listed here when the
|
||||
# ratio stayed below 1.0.
|
||||
UNIT_ARG = {2, 3, 7, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 47, 48,
|
||||
56, 57, 58, 63, 69, 70, 79, 91, 92, 95, 105, 108, 128, 143}
|
||||
# DERIVED FROM THE IMPLEMENTATIONS, not from operand ranges. Each of these
|
||||
# built-ins resolves to a ScriptPhase vtable slot whose body does
|
||||
# lwz rX, 324(rPhase) ; the unit array
|
||||
# lwz rY, 4(rArgBase) ; local[4]
|
||||
# rlwinm rY, rY, 2, 0, 29 ; x4
|
||||
# lwzx ... ; -> the record
|
||||
# The previous set was inferred statistically from operand ranges and listed a
|
||||
# slot only "when the ratio stayed below 1.0", so it was CONSERVATIVE: all 31 of
|
||||
# its entries are confirmed here (zero false positives) but it MISSED 24 more.
|
||||
# Control, over all 28 stages: slot 0 is the tag constant 1 in 100.0% of the
|
||||
# original 31's calls, 100.0% of the 24 additions', and only 2.5% of the 92
|
||||
# built-ins in neither set.
|
||||
UNIT_ARG = {2, 3, 7, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30,
|
||||
32, 42, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60, 61, 63, 69,
|
||||
70, 72, 79, 80, 83, 91, 92, 94, 95, 101, 105, 108, 109, 117, 128,
|
||||
136, 137, 141, 142, 143}
|
||||
UNIT_ARG2 = {2, 18, 47, 48, 56, 79, 95, 128} # a SECOND unit index at blob[12]
|
||||
UNIT_ARG3 = {128} # and a third at blob[20]
|
||||
UNIT_SLOTS = {4: UNIT_ARG, 12: UNIT_ARG2, 20: UNIT_ARG3}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user