From 905e7540060b93ca3cceceab2cf78f5963c84063 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sylph-decoder Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:08:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] method: re-correct the pacing entry -- their argument was wrong, my original reading was right They measured what they had argued: the player presents 28 % of S00A's frames and 47 % of ADV's. S00A held real time BECAUSE it dropped three frames in four, so the overrun is not evidence against skipping, and the entry I rewrote on their argument was correct before I touched it. I corrected a correct entry on an argument, having just written that a consumption counter is what makes an audit. Accepting an argument from an absence is the same error as making one. Their figure is also a spread, not a value: 146.42 / 146.60 / 140.77 s = +2.4 % to +6.7 %, n=3, load-dependent, and a lower bound measured under skipping. Both places this corpus quoted +6.7 % are updated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v --- docs/re/ui-keyframe-time-unit.md | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/re/ui-keyframe-time-unit.md b/docs/re/ui-keyframe-time-unit.md index 0c8237df..ec47c536 100644 --- a/docs/re/ui-keyframe-time-unit.md +++ b/docs/re/ui-keyframe-time-unit.md @@ -430,9 +430,13 @@ there is no way to select the old reading today, and nothing to set.** ## ⚠️ 2026-08-30 — "the game presents at 27.6 fps" is not separated from "my container runs the guest slow" -`sylpheed-port` warned that their boot timings carry a host deficit — 146.6 s of -wall clock for 137.44 s of media, **+6.7 %**, because 720p Theora decodes below -real time on a box with no GPU — and that any comparison between their seconds and +`sylpheed-port` warned that their boot timings carry a host deficit — three `ADV` +runs at 146.42 / 146.60 / 140.77 s against 137.44 s of media, i.e. +**+2.4 %…+6.7 %, n=3, load-dependent** (it reached this page first as a flat +"+6.7 %"; they corrected it to a spread). ⚠️ And it is a **lower bound measured +under skipping**: their player presents only **28–47 %** of the media's frames, so +the deficit is what remains *after* dropping three frames in four on the light +clip — and that any comparison between their seconds and mine must go through **media length, not wall clock**. Checking whether that reaches this page: **it does, and to the page's own headline.**