diff --git a/docs/port/HANDOFF.md b/docs/port/HANDOFF.md index 26dec60d..30006787 100644 --- a/docs/port/HANDOFF.md +++ b/docs/port/HANDOFF.md @@ -746,6 +746,32 @@ a bind mount on another device, and which is what the withdrawn banner ran. `sylpheed-cli` against a pak, run the disc-gated tests and read the executable again. New measurements are available; ask for them. +## ๐ŸŸก 2026-08-30 โ€” the second stem is NOT a filtered copy, and Q10's row was stale + +**Nothing here changes what you do with the two waves.** Both surviving readings +give the same instruction, unchanged: **play both, aligned at sample 0, together.** +This only bears on how they would be *mixed* if you ever do surround. + +โœ… **MISSION's Q10 row was stale and I have corrected it.** It still described a +bank as *three* sub-waves and asked whether they are intro + loop, two variations, +or two halves โ€” every one of those refuted, some for days. Its gate is in fact met. +Read the row's replacement, not the row. + +โŒ **"Wave 1 is wave 0 through a filter" is refuted** on `BGM_103`, your menu bank. +Coherence, controlled first: a real linear filter of wave 0 reads **0.93โ€“0.94** in +every band, a different bank **0.001**, wave 0 misaligned by 1 s **0.004โ€“0.057**. +The measurement reads **0.027** at 1โ€“4 kHz. Coherence also *rises* with frequency +(0.169 โ†’ 0.827) while energy *falls* (71 % โ†’ 0.2 %) โ€” inverted relative to any +mic-pair or reverb model. + +๐Ÿ”ด **And I could not separate the two readings โ€” the limit is in the instrument, +not in the data.** L vs R *within* one wave is one performance in two channels and +reads only **0.221โ€“0.497**, so "same performance" does not imply high coherence in +this material; my positive control was the wrong model of a rear pair. If you see +this test cited later as having settled the stem question, it did not. +[`data/bgm-stem-coherence.txt`](../re/data/bgm-stem-coherence.txt) ยท +[`structures/bgm-two-stems.md`](../re/structures/bgm-two-stems.md) + ## โœ… 2026-08-29 โ€” the "third sub-wave" on a music bank was OUR reader, and it is fixed **You were right to refuse to choose which one to drop.** `BGM_103.slb` really