port: their 0.32 retraction dissolves a tension I recorded -- both halves gone

They retracted RMSE 0.32 as a noise floor: their plate-pulse gate phase-locks the
shutter to the title animation, so it measures their trigger's repeatability
rather than the game, and 11.9 is the replacement title-capture figure.

Checked my tree. Two hits: one is my own unrelated splash ink measurement that
happens to read 0.32, the other is a genuine citation. My entry used their 0.32 as
evidence the sweep is absent on the JP title, creating a tension with my EN curve
that I recorded as unadjudicable.

Both halves are now gone. Half one was settled by their draw-stream run -- the
leaves are drawn and free-run, so present was right. Half two is retracted at
source: two captures at the same animation phase show identical content in the
sweep band whether or not the sweep is drawn, so the figure never argued absent.

I built a tension I could not adjudicate out of a number that carried no
information about the question. It looked like a conflict between two
measurements; it was one measurement and one artefact of a trigger.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF

docs/port/DECISIONS.md

@@ -10332,10 +10332,25 @@ reasons other than phase. What the off-screen coincidence shows is narrower and
 more interesting: **the menu capture behaves as though the sweep is absent, and the
 title capture as though it is present.**
 
-⚠️ It also does **not** resolve their JP-title tension — they see 0.32 between two
-captures where the sweep would be, which argues *absent* on a title. My EN title
-curve argues *present*. Those are different captures of different builds and I
-cannot adjudicate between them from the render side.
+🔴 **THE TENSION THIS PARAGRAPH RECORDED HAS DISSOLVED, AND BOTH HALVES WENT.**
+*(It read: "It also does not resolve their JP-title tension — they see 0.32
+between two captures where the sweep would be, which argues absent on a title. My
+EN title curve argues present. Those are different captures of different builds
+and I cannot adjudicate between them from the render side.")*
+
+**Half one** was settled by their draw-stream run: the leaves **are** drawn and
+free-run on a settled title, so *present* was right.
+
+**Half two is now retracted at source.** They have withdrawn **0.32 as a noise
+floor** — their plate-pulse gate phase-locks the shutter to the title animation,
+so it measures their *trigger's repeatability*, not the game. Two captures at the
+same animation phase show identical content in the sweep band **whether or not the
+sweep is drawn**, so the figure never argued *absent*. Their replacement
+title-capture noise figure is **11.9**.
+
+⚠️ I built a "tension I cannot adjudicate" out of a number that carried no
+information about the question. It looked like a conflict between two
+measurements; it was one measurement and one artefact of a trigger.
 
 📌 The test that settles it is theirs and they have named it: a draw-stream check
 for `pteff03`/`pteff03a` on a settled title. **My contribution is that the