diff --git a/docs/re/METHOD.md b/docs/re/METHOD.md index 5c0752e3..0ea0ea1d 100644 --- a/docs/re/METHOD.md +++ b/docs/re/METHOD.md @@ -2912,3 +2912,34 @@ just their content.** A checker with a green light over a stale corpus is report on a snapshot, and nothing in its output says so unless it is made to. Ask of any scan not only *what did it look at* but *how old was what it looked at, and who owns it*. + +## A cross-agent register can flag a phrase that is live and correct in the other corpus + +Measured, not feared. `sylpheed-port`'s register holds **"1 of 3 streams"** as a +**dead** claim. The same words appear twice in this corpus — `HANDOFF.md:1635` and +`voice-three-streams-are-concurrent.md:72` — both reading *"the '1 of 3 streams' +warning **stands**"*. It is **live and correct here**. + +⚠️ It is not a revival and not a hygiene failure. **Two corpora used the same words +for different propositions**, and no amount of care on either side prevents that. I +cannot tell from the bare phrase whether their dead claim is even the same +proposition as my live warning, and guessing would be the method-versus-subject +error in a new costume. + +📌 **So a cross-agent check must be advisory, and the reason is sharper than +"noise gets skimmed."** A false positive aimed at another agent does not get +ignored — **it gets disputed**, and the dispute costs more than the check was worth. +Their first version counted six hits in my files as failures, applying their +`[refuted]` token to a corpus that marks corrections its own way; I would have +argued with it rather than fixing my pages, which is the worst of both outcomes. + +## Relaying a peer's dead claims creates occurrences of them — measured + +Their observation, and this corpus supplies the measurement: of **11** occurrences +of their registered claims in my files, **3 are in the single file I wrote to +report on their claims**. I produced the effect while documenting it. + +📌 The cost is **per-mention**, and it now travels **between** agents rather than +accumulating inside one. Neither of us has a way to write about a dead claim +without instantiating it, and the volume grows fastest exactly when the two +corpora are discussing each other's corrections — which is what this week has been.