Three things, all from parsing ptbtn0Nf.rat as a build.
1. THE RING SPINS. Its two keyframes differ in exactly one field: rotation_deg
ramps 0 -> 360 with position, scale, alpha and tint all constant. A spin in
place, the same shape as the GP_BUNK example already recorded.
2. THE ORACLE CONFIRMS THE GAME RENDERS IT. In the OPTIONS-focused capture the
ring's bright head sits in a completely different angular position from the
sprite's own -- caught mid-spin. This is a SECOND independent confirmation that
rotation_deg is drawn, now on a different screen and a different element from the
ptloop sweeps, and it raises rotation's priority: it is not a title-only concern
that sits off-screen at rest, it is the main menu's focus marker.
NO ANGLE IS QUOTED. A brightest-region centroid says ~250 deg, but the control
refuses that precision -- rotating the sprite by a known 30/90/180/270 and
re-measuring gives errors up to 19.8 deg. What survives the error bar is that a
<=20 deg error cannot manufacture a ~250 deg displacement.
3. WHICH PLACEMENT WINS -- correcting this page's own earlier caveat, which said
to use the leaf only for elements the parent does not declare. Right for a BASE
record, wrong for an f record: the parent declares NO element for ptbtn0Nf.rat at
all (zero of build 5's 16), so the f record's placement comes from its leaf for
BOTH elements, label included. The label's (-7,-7) is load-bearing -- the f
sprite is 13px larger per axis and -7 keeps them concentric (535+96/2 = 583 vs
542+83/2 = 583.5). Corroborated against the oracle: the focused-minus-unfocused
region is x 505..703, and the leaf predicts a right edge near 707 where the
parent reading predicts 714.
Also exposes UiBuild::records (name -> (offset, size) of a nested .rat leaf).
Nested records were parsed into a PRIVATE map, so a consumer holding a UiBuild
could not locate a leaf's bytes at all -- which is exactly what blocked the port
from reaching the ring.
The port needed ptbtneff01.t32's placement and was about to author it from an
eyeballed PNG measurement. It does not have to: a `.rat` leaf needs no new
reader. Its first 32 bytes have a bundle header's shape -- "RATC", 0x3c
declaration-entry size at +4, element count at +20, design 1280x720 at +24/+28 --
so ui_layout::parse_build reads it unchanged.
The control is the base record, whose position is known independently: the parent
screen reports ptbtn01.rat resting at (542,162), and parsing the leaf alone
returns ptbtn01.t32 at (542,162). It reproduces all five buttons.
Positions are absolute design-space top-left. The ring rests at (500, 156/236/
316/396/476) for buttons 1-5 -- a uniform (-42,-6) from each button's own rest,
identical in the Japanese bundle. The bright label is a uniform (-7,-7).
Two things recorded rather than smoothed over: a leaf's placement DUPLICATES the
parent's rather than being relative to it, and the two copies are not always
byte-equal (ptbtn04's parent says y=401, its leaf says 402) -- the parent is what
compose honours, so the leaf is the source only for elements the parent does not
declare, which is exactly the ring. And `screen render --focus` is blind to the
ring for the same reason the port's exporter was: el.focused is name-based on
top-level elements and neither walks into the leaf.
1 SPLASH ADDRESSING (was blocking P3). No content predicate exists: design size
fails (every extra composable bundle sampled is 1280x720, like every screen) and
element count fails (fragments run 2..15, the splash halves are 3 and 7). But
GP_TITLE needs none -- `--all` adds exactly four bundles there and all four are
real screens, with the --all index equal to the pak entry index 1:1. And there
are TWO splash screens: 11/14 are the developer logos, 10/13 are the SQUARE ENIX
publisher wordmark, which the port did not have and which the boot shows first.
2 FADE-OUT (was blocking P3). It is (a), and it is bigger than the fade quad.
Every element ends on exactly ONE untimed keyframe, which rules out (b); that
block is where the screen plays out -- quad to a=255, buttons/labels/glows to
a=0, frames hold. (c) is refuted by a null test that discriminates: a black quad
alone holds the button/background brightness ratio constant, and through the
fade it falls 6.50 -> 1.94, 3.4x monotonic.
3 FOCUS (saves P5 rework). Over-vs-instead is unobservable -- the focused sprite
covers the base at 100.0% of base-visible pixels on three pairs once aligned
(true offset (7,7); the centre alignment reads a misleading 78-84%), and
compositing both ways differs by RMSE 1.1 inside the button rect. The real defect
is the focus record's SECOND element: ptbtn0Nf.rat declares ptbtneff01.t32 (a
42x46 glowing ring, focus only) plus the bright label, where the base declares
one sprite. That ring is the marker the port draws nowhere.
5 GAMMA. The capture is not neutral: capture ~ 255*(render/255)^g, g ~ 1.34-1.49,
and the chain says it is a ramp the GAME installed, not a capture artefact. So
RMSE against captures has a floor. Reach stated: the flat patches are all dark
(render ~0-60), so midtones and highlights are unconstrained.
4 ROTATION is a human's call and is recorded in MISSION, not acted on -- the port
rotating while the reference renderer does not would make verify-screen report a
large diff meaning "the port is right". The RE half is answered: rotation is
about the declared pivot, measured against a GPU capture.
The focus record's +20 element-count word is marked 🟡 not ✅ -- read on GP_TITLE's
ten button records only; the disc-wide check is written and still running.
