All three jobs used `dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable`, so the gate resolved to
whatever stable was on the day it ran. A floating lint gate is not a gate: the
same tree goes green or red by date, and that already produced a disagreement
between two people reading the same commit — `collapsible_else_if` is `warn` on
1.92.0 and `allow`-by-default pedantic on 1.98.1, so both readings were correct.
1.98.1 is what run 206 resolved and what `docker/ci/Dockerfile` already pins, so
`docker/ci/run cargo clippy …` on a desktop becomes a true stand-in for this
workflow instead of an approximation. The header says how to bump: the three
refs here and the Dockerfile's `FROM` in one commit, in a PR of its own, where
the lints the new version turns on are the diff.
Also: the corpus-report step's comment quoted `207/0/14`, a tally two baselines
old. It now describes the shape of the problem without pinning a number that
decays.
Closes#15.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`cargo test --workspace` reports the same tally whether the disc corpus was
exercised or entirely absent. Measured: the disc suites RAN on a developer
desktop (1936 s, mesh_consistency_disc alone 1220 s) and SKIPPED on CI
(2.4 s total) -- and both reported 207 passed / 0 failed / 14 ignored across
30 suites.
Two mechanisms compound:
* a skip is a PASSING test. The gated suites `eprintln!("SKIP: ...")` and
return early from a test that still passes, so a skipped suite and a
fully exercised one both score 1 passed. The totals are invariant.
* the message is invisible. `cargo test` captures a passing test's output,
so NEITHER log contains a `SKIP:` line. The absence of one proves
nothing, which makes the obvious check useless too.
And `14 ignored` cannot help: `#[ignore]` is static, so that column is the
literal count of attributes in the source and cannot move at runtime. Ask
what this check would still report if the corpus were entirely absent, and
the answer is 207/0/14.
This is #16's remedy (2) -- the only one that touches the REPORT, which is
the defect. Remedies (1) and (3) improve the control and are left open.
Adds `tests/corpus_report.rs`: always runs, never fails, resolves all three
corpora exactly as the per-suite helpers do, and records what was available.
It writes to a FILE rather than relying on stdout, because a passing test's
stdout is captured and would be invisible in exactly the CI log that needs
it; the workflow then prints that file. It also appends to
GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY when set.
Run here, it immediately shows the thing the issue is about -- all three
corpora resolve through the HARDCODED fallback, so SYLPHEED_DISC is not
controlling anything on this machine:
SYLPHEED_DISC PRESENT via the HARDCODED fallback, NOT $SYLPHEED_DISC
SYLPHEED_RES3D PRESENT via the HARDCODED fallback, NOT $SYLPHEED_RES3D
SYLPHEED_ISO PRESENT via the HARDCODED fallback, NOT $SYLPHEED_ISO
The ABSENT branch is the one CI takes and cannot be reached on a machine
that has the corpora, so `resolve_renders_every_branch` exercises it
directly rather than shipping it unrun -- along with "set but does not
resolve", which is what a typo in the env var produces and which is
deliberately reported as a DIFFERENT state from absent, since the two want
different fixes.
Verified: `cargo fmt --all -- --check` clean. Clippy is unchanged by this
(a test target; CI's `cargo clippy --workspace` does not build test cfg) --
it fails identically on unmodified main here with
`only_used_in_recursion` at vfs.rs:85, which is the rustc 1.90.0 vs the
runner's 1.98.1 divergence, i.e. #15, not this.
Refs #16
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
With the build fixed, `trunk build --release` succeeds and the job then
died on its last step:
::error:: @actions/artifact v2.0.0+, upload-artifact@v4+ and
download-artifact@v4+ are not currently supported on GHES.
Gitea presents as GHES and the action aborts by design -- go-gitea/gitea
#31256 and #36024. Same class as the trunk-action bug this branch already
fixes: an action written for GitHub's hosted fleet, on a runner that is not
it.
Dropped rather than downgraded, because nothing consumes the artifact.
`web-dist` had exactly one reference in the repository -- the line that
produced it. There is no `download-artifact`, no deploy step, and no second
workflow. It was failing the job for no benefit.
The two ways to keep it are recorded in the file rather than here, because
choosing between them needs a fact this run does not provide (the runner's
node version) or a supply-chain decision (a third-party action).
What now runs end to end on aarch64, from scratch:
Install Trunk ok (v0.5.1, the arch fix, on the real runner)
cargo check wasm32 ok
trunk build --release ok 10m 56s, 3 files in dist/
Refs #11
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`Install Trunk` has never run to completion here, because the two steps
before it always failed first. With those cleared it becomes reachable,
and on this runner v0.5.0 would fetch the wrong binary.
v0.5.0 switches on PLATFORM alone and never consults the architecture:
case 'linux': arch = 'x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'; break;
v0.5.1 reads it and maps it, failing loudly rather than wrongly:
const arch = process.env['ARCH'] || process.arch;
case 'x64': targetArch = 'x86_64'; break;
case 'arm64': targetArch = 'aarch64'; break;
default: core.setFailed(`Unsupported architecture: ${arch}`); return;
Node reports `arm64` here, so it resolves to `aarch64`, and upstream does
publish trunk-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz. There is also an `ARCH`
env override if the mapping is ever wrong.
Read out of the two bundled dist/index.js files, not the release notes.
Counts moved as predicted: `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` 1 -> 0, `aarch64`
0 -> 1, `os.arch()` 5 -> 5. Confirmed independently on both machines.
Two further changes the bump carries, neither of them about architecture:
* the download host moves thedodd/trunk -> trunk-rs/trunk. Trunk moved
repositories and v0.5.0 still points at the old one -- arguably the
more durable half of the fix.
* `io.mv` 1 -> 0 and `io.cp` 2 -> 3. A cross-filesystem move throws
EXDEV; a copy does not. This is the fix for self-hosted runners whose
/tmp is a separate filesystem, which is ours. NOTE: the string EXDEV
appears zero times in either bundle, so this cannot be found by
grepping for the error it prevents -- it is visible only as the
primitive swap.
STILL UNVERIFIED: whether `trunk build --release` then succeeds. Everything
above concerns selecting and fetching the binary. The step after it has
never run in this repository's history, on any architecture, so there is no
basis to predict it. Expect to read that log fresh.
Refs #11
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable` installs a minimal profile. The `native`
job named no components, so every run that reached the Clippy step died
on
error: 'cargo-clippy' is not installed for the toolchain
'stable-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu'
before clippy read a line of source. That is not a lint result; the step
had never run. The `fmt` job below always named `components: rustfmt`
correctly — this one never did.
Two lines of behaviour change. The rest is the comment explaining why the
step is left gating on `-D warnings` rather than softened: the workspace
is not clippy-clean (run 203's build alone emits ~13 rustc warnings that
`-D warnings` promotes to errors), and `continue-on-error` cannot tell
"debt not yet paid" from "debt paid". That debt is scoped in #13, the way
the rustfmt debt is in #12.
Run 203 is what made this visible. With the aarch64 fix in c457320 the
native job got all the way through:
cargo check --workspace ok 10m01s
cargo build --workspace ok 19m04s
cargo test --workspace ok 16m22s 214 passed, 0 failed
cargo clippy --workspace toolchain error
Refs #13
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01McNbzUeq1KRBWs4G6X2YVj
This workflow has never once gone green on this instance: 23 runs cancelled,
2 waiting, zero successes. Not a regression -- it has been decorative since it
was written, because it describes GitHub's hosted fleet and runs on one
self-hosted aarch64 Pi advertising ["ubuntu-latest","ubuntu-24.04",
"ubuntu-22.04"].
Two failures, both configuration rather than code:
`windows-latest` and `macos-latest` match no runner label, so those jobs sit in
WAITING for ever and the RUN never reaches a terminal state. A pull request's
checks therefore never resolve either way -- not red, just never finished, which
is worse than red because a red check tells you something. Removed: a second
architecture here needs a second runner, not a second matrix row.
`--target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` on an aarch64 host makes every build a
cross-compile, and `wayland-sys`'s build script dies on it with "pkg-config has
not been configured to support cross-compilation". Dropped; the native job now
builds for its host.
NOT touched, deliberately: the WASM and Formatting jobs still fail, on real code
state rather than on configuration -- `getrandom` needs the `wasm_js` backend
for wasm32-unknown-unknown, and `cargo fmt --check` reports a ~13,000 line diff
across the tree. Editing those two into passing is precisely the leniency with
an expiry date nobody sets that PROTOCOL.md now forbids. They are issues, not
workflow lines.
(One latent defect noted while reading: `jetli/trunk-action` fetches
trunk-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu onto this aarch64 host. It has never been reached
because the WASM check fails first, and it will bite the moment that is fixed.)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01McNbzUeq1KRBWs4G6X2YVj
