The compositor painted in declaration order, which the draw capture proved wrong
— the title's background is declared ninth and paints first. The order the game
uses is its runtime child list, and no decoded field reproduces it, so rather
than leave the screen composited wrongly this lands the orders that HAVE been
read off the running game and falls back to declaration order everywhere else.
Two builds are covered: GP_TITLE's title build and the GAME ARTS / SETA / studio
anima splash. Keyed by element names, which identify a build across paks and
language variants.
Rendering it exposed a second defect, and the same capture settles it: the
kind = 0x4 elements are motion-trail ghosts, not resting content. The bundle
declares three instances of each wordmark; the capture shows exactly ONE quad at
each wordmark's position. Drawing them at their resting keyframe put three
oversized PROJECT SYLPHEED copies across the composite. They are now skipped.
Verified with an artifact, not a green build: the composite is committed
(captures/title-composited-measured-order.png) and now reads as the title screen
— background, planet, ship, wordmark, TM, copyright, correctly layered.
The test is disc-gated and was checked BOTH ways: it passes as landed, and
disabling the order table makes it fail. It reads one pak rather than every
build on the disc — the first version used the all-builds helper and got the
test process OOM-killed running alongside the other three.
The title screen needs an order that puts element 13 (`ptbase2.t32`, the
full-screen background) behind elements 0-5 (the wordmarks) — the capture shows
the wordmarks on top, so the declaration table is not it. Two other orderings
the bundle carries were the cheap candidates, and both are now dead:
* the **placement region** stores a keyframe group per element with an explicit
element index, so it could be a second ordering. It is not — it equals the
declaration order on every build on the disc. `UiBuild::placement_order`
exposes it and `placement_region_order_is_never_a_second_ordering` pins it, so
the refutation stays checkable instead of remembered.
* the **RATC child order** is the declaration order with the `.prm` elements
absent — strictly less information, and no place to put the background other
than where the table already puts it.
`screen info --geometry` prints both, plus each element's decoded sprite size
beside `pivot*2` and every keyframe's scale/position/time — the numbers a
placement hypothesis has to be tested against, and how the pivot/scale rule in
the previous commit was found.
`title_background_is_full_screen` pins that rule against the disc rather than a
synthetic sprite. `scaled_elements_are_a_small_and_mostly_undiscriminating_minority`
reports the scope honestly: 865 of 5 130 resting placements are scaled at all,
and only 213 of those could tell "about the pivot" from "about the sprite
centre" — which the capture did *not* settle, because `ptbase2`'s pivot is its
centre. It also counts how far `pivot*2` is from the decoded size disc-wide
(2 521 agree, 1 884 are off by more than 16 px), which demotes the "pivot is
exactly half the texture" result to a property of the tutorial bundle.
