d0f6dfa86131b8a24f9be3db4e10caf3703538d0
9 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sylpheed port agent
|
39209eab05 |
port: the title's sweeps loop, the black hold is 9 units, and one claim refuted
THREE THINGS FROM THE DECODER, one of which I am not taking. REFUTED: "the developer splash is one composited quad, the bounding box of the three logos". The observed quad is 525x259 at (378,155). The three logos' bounding box is 500x421 at (390,164) -- a 259-tall quad CANNOT contain them, and palogo_anima alone starts at y=449, thirty-five pixels below that quad's bottom edge. The observed quad matches the union of gamearts_eff and seta_eff, 521x261 at (379,154), to about four pixels in every dimension -- and both of those are TRANSIENTS my own census flagged, dark by t=45, so a frame containing that quad is a build-in frame rather than the settled screen. I cannot see their draw stream, so I sent the arithmetic rather than a verdict, and the port keeps drawing three: I will not stop drawing an element on a claim whose stated identification excludes that element from its own bounding box. THE BLACK HOLD IS 9 UNITS, NOT 12. I authored 12 from Q7's luminance plateau of 0.17-0.23 s, supported by the menus' transition quad. The Decoder counted SUBMITTED QUADS instead -- luminance cannot separate the outgoing fade's tail from true black. Four frames with no sprite quad at all, at 2.284 units/frame derived from the disc as its own clock, gives 9.1 units = 0.152 s (6.9-11.4). That overlaps the luminance figure only at the top, and the true black is SHORTER still since both boundary frames carry picture. My 12 was supported by analogy -- a different screen's quad on a different path -- and a number that fits by analogy loses to one measured in place. verify-dwell's bound moved with it; both screens still agree. THE TITLE'S SWEEPS LOOP. The oracle shows the quad oscillating over its whole x range and resetting hard, one reset in the first title dwell and two in the second. The loop-length field could NOT have settled it, correcting a hope I had stated: both records declare exactly their last keyframe time, slack zero, and "loops at 600" and "runs once for 600 and stops" write the identical header. Verified on the two sweeps' LCM, since their periods differ: 600 and 720 realign at 3600 units, mean diff 0, against 0.438 at half that. Scoped to the title. The menus declare the same lengths but the oracle measurement is of the title, and my own weak evidence points the other way there -- best match with the sweeps off-screen, three times worse mid-screen, against a 73% on-screen duty cycle if they looped. Two weak signals in opposite directions is a reason to scope, not to pick. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF |
||
|
Sylpheed port agent
|
4226505222 |
port: pose a settled screen at ONE instant -- title 1.81% -> 0.26%, splashes to 0.01%
The Decoder's finding, applied. `rest()` returns each element's last hold keyframe chosen independently of every other element: right for anything that ends the screen settled, exactly wrong for a transient. The title's ptlogo_back2eff1 is a two-frame flash (0 until t52, 255 at t54-56, 0 by t58), so its last hold IS the flash peak and rest() left it burning -- five of them, drawn at once. The settled instant is the longest interval containing no keyframe time, over a bundle's TOP-LEVEL elements. Reproduced here before adopting: title [160, 236], midpoint 198, the Decoder's number to the unit. The top-level restriction is what makes it match -- including the ptloop leaves gives [269, 540]. AGAINST THE ORACLE: title 20.92 RMSE 1.81% -> 14.61 RMSE 0.26% publisher_logo 9.05 0.75% -> 2.17 0.01% developer_logos 8.86 0.33% -> 3.05 0.01% main_menu 0.08% -> 0.08% window too narrow extras 0.19% -> 0.19% window too narrow Seven times fewer differing pixels on the title, seventy-five times fewer on the publisher splash, whose differing region is now a 13x18 box. The largest correctness gain this port has had, and none of it is mine -- it is a decode computed from the keyframe table with no reference to any capture. APPLIED ONLY WHERE THE WINDOW IS WIDE, and the bar is not invented. This export's widths split with nothing in between: 214, 190, 145, 76, then 12, 12, 8, 4. The bar is 30 units -- the Decoder's disc-wide census puts the knee there (30% of bundles >= 30, 42% under 10, the latter mostly loop* fragments meant to be in motion) and this export's screens sit 4x either side with nothing between 12 and 46. Two independent populations agreeing on where to cut. Checked unbroken: boot pacing unmoved, scripted walk runs end to end with focus restored. Also recorded: my "34 focus-record elements, only 2 varying" is right for GP_TITLE and reads as a fact about the format -- disc-wide it is 210 varying, 202 with rest() at the peak, concentrated in the paks a wider port reaches next. And their sharper framing, which I have adopted: a pulsing element has no resting pose at all, so rest() is MALFORMED rather than mis-answered on one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF |
||
|
Sylpheed port agent
|
d57366a35f |
port: the focus ring had silently stopped, and the plate's period is now the disc's
BLOCKED said the record-layout change touches five things: pose_at, settle_units, spin_period_units, exit_ramp_units and the plate. I checked two, reported that, and did not work the rest of the list. `spin_period_units` required "the first timed and the second untimed". Under the corrected layout the ring reads t=0 rot=0 and t=120 rot=360 -- both timed -- so the rule returned 0 and THE FOCUS RING STOPPED SPINNING. Nothing reported it: a period of 0 is a legal "this element does not spin". Rewritten to take the SPAN between the two poses: 120 - 0 = 120 units, the same number the old rule produced, which is evidence the corrected layout is self-consistent rather than merely different. Verified the way P5 verified it, by bit-identity one period apart on the ring's own 60x60 box so the ptloop sweeps cannot confound it: 0 at +120 units (twice), 8.61 at a quarter period, 8.88 at half. Three wrong instruments on the way, and the sequence is the lesson. A whole-frame `max` saturates on one rotating edge (adjacent frames scored 131 with a mean of 0.022). A live --menu filmstrip jitters by up to a frame, which is ~3 degrees of ring. And a whole-frame comparison is dominated by the sweeps, which move 480 px over one ring period. `--focus=<id>` was added so a --screen run can draw a focus record deterministically, which is what made the check reproducible. THE PLATE'S PERIOD IS NOW 105, THE DISC'S OWN GROUP LENGTH, and it disagrees with the measurement. The ambiguity the entry carried is gone -- it used to say the cycle might restart at t=6 rather than 0 and that nothing separated them; the group now runs t=0 to t=105, both at alpha 0, and there is one reading. But 105 units is 1.750 s, or 1.906 s scaled by the factor the ring shows between its declared 120 and its measured 2.177 s -- about 17% below all four corpus timings (2.12 / 2.19 / 2.34 / 2.31). The old 129 gave 2.34 s, at the top of the range, which is why it looked right. 129 was the last timed keyframe plus exit_ramp_units, and that constant is deleted. A period built on a constant that no longer exists cannot stay even though it fitted better, so the port ships the disc's number and says it is wrong. Verified bit-identical 105 units apart, 0.83 at 30 units. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF |
||
|
Sylpheed port agent
|
5dbc9aeac0 |
port: delete exit_ramp_units, invert the format's own rule, and guard a scale-0 leaf
FOUR THINGS, and the first is what MISSION section 3 calls the measure of
progress.
DELETED `exit_ramp_units` AND `exit_ramp_seconds`. They were authored because the
disc had no time slot on a group's final keyframe, so the ramp into it was the
one unknown duration per screen. Under the corrected record layout that keyframe
does not exist -- a group is an 8-byte header then frames x {u32 time; 36-byte
pose} and every pose is timed. VERIFIED DEAD BEFORE DELETING: setting it to 9999
(166 s) moved the boot's transitions by 0.04 s, which is wall-clock jitter, and
both uses in ScreenView are gated on a condition that no longer fires on any of
the export's 866 keyframes.
INVERTED THE FORMAT'S OWN RULE. `check.rs` enforced "the final keyframe has no
`t`; the disc has no time slot there" and FORMAT.md stated it. Both are now
backwards, and the validator fired 150 times on a re-export. I had not run
`check` between pinning the tag and measuring against the oracle -- the pixel
harness was green while the format validator was failing on every screen with a
multi-keyframe group. A correctness harness does not replace a format one; they
fail at different layers.
GUARDED A SCALE-0 LEAF, which the Decoder hit in its own renderer: its leaf
branch marked the element drawn unconditionally while the blit returned early on
zero scale, so a scale-0 leaf suppressed its parent and blanked the element --
live on all four loading screens. This port did not have the bug only because
authored/rendering.json happens not to list pgloading_loop5. That is an accident
of a gate written for another reason, not a defence, so `_draw_leaf` now reports
whether it drew and `_draw` falls back to the parent.
ISOLATED THE PACING QUESTION rather than leaving it as a suspected regression.
Legacy association: publisher 4.70 agrees, developer 3.92 DIFFERS. Corrected:
publisher 4.26 DIFFERS, developer 3.62 agrees. Both misses are ~0.03 s outside a
composite bound. The association traded which screen is marginally out; it did
not regress the pacing.
Bumped the pin c -> d for the parser and audio changes. Its headline renderer
change does not reach this port: sylpheed-cli builds from the workspace crate.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF
|
||
|
Sylpheed port agent
|
9f6959c7ca |
port: implement the decoded leaf composition -- and it does not close the 1.82%
The Decoder decoded the rule I refused to guess: draw the leaf on its own timeline, do NOT multiply the parent's alpha in. Multiplying is refuted rather than unsupported -- at the fitted time the parent has expired, so leaf x parent predicts zero for both quads and the sweeps would be invisible. They are drawn. Implemented: `_draw_leaf` runs the leaf unclamped, like the spinning ring and for the same reason -- held at its own rest.t the leaf sits at x=1521, entirely off the right edge, so `holding` would delete the sweeps rather than settle them. AND IT CHANGES NOTHING MEASURABLE. The title is still 1.82% against the oracle: 1.82 at t=261, 1.81 at t=355, 1.79 at t=420. At t=355 my interpolation puts the leaf's top-left at x ~ -324, off-screen left, where the Decoder's model puts the quad's CENTRE at 981. Those cannot both be right, and it is not something to tune away -- it is a disagreement about how the leaf's keyframes become a placed quad, most likely in the pivot and the rotation about it. Handed back with both numbers. So: the exporter no longer drops the data, the composition rule is implemented as decoded, and the port's largest oracle gap is exactly where it was. Fixing the export was necessary and not sufficient. TWO FLAGGED ELEMENTS DELIBERATELY NOT DRAWN, in authored/rendering.json with reasons. title_jp/ptlogo_eff2 (parent 125%, leaf 100%) is the same shape and is the element DECISIONS has recorded since P1 as the largest render disagreement -- but the Decoder said plainly "I have not tested it", and drawing it would extend a decode past the case it was fitted on. pgloading_loop5's leaf is scale (0,0), and scale-0 is one of the three historical failures this corpus names. Neither can be adjudicated here: title_jp has no oracle capture, and verify-screen compares against a renderer that draws no leaves at all, so ANY leaf drawing increases that divergence whether right or wrong. Its max went 155 -> 232 when they were drawn, and that number is not evidence in either direction. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF |
||
|
Sylpheed port agent
|
7c918006e8 |
port: the PRESS (A) plate pulses -- authored per element, because 82 of 212 share its shape
The human listed pulsation as first-class and the port drew nothing: the plate's focus record `ptbtn00f` was never reached, because press_start has no `buttons` and nothing is focused. That it LOOPS is measured -- the corpus timed the period four times (2.12 / 2.19 / 2.34 / 2.31 s) and you cannot measure a period unless the thing repeats. THE RULE I WAS GOING TO WRITE DIED IN THE CENSUS. The spinning ring is a rule in the renderer because it has a disc-wide check: 16 of 212 elements match its shape and all 16 are focus rings. The analogous shape for a pulse -- keyframes varying only in alpha, first alpha equal to last -- matches 82 OF 212, including ptcopyright, palogo_sqex, ptmsg and every _eff fade. A renderer rule on it would make the copyright notice pulse. Narrowed to focus records it matches exactly one distinct element, and a rule justified by n=1 is a special case wearing a rule's clothes. So it is a LOOKUP in authored/timing.json keyed <screen>/<element>, with the census recorded beside it so nobody widens it later. The period is 129 units -- the element's own group under the port's existing model: last timed keyframe t=105 plus the authored exit_ramp_units of 24. No new constant. 2.150 s at 60 units/s, 2.295 s at the ~28.1 fps the emulator presents, against measurements of 2.12-2.34. IT IS A CHOICE AND THE ALTERNATIVE IS STATED: restarting at the group's first keyframe (t=6) instead of 0 gives 123 units = 2.050 / 2.189 s, also inside the measured spread. Nothing separates them. t=0 is taken because it is where every other group starts -- consistency, not evidence. Verified the way the ring was, by bit-identity one period apart. 20 periods is 43.00 s = exactly 172 film frames: frames N and N+172 differ by 0-1/255, while the control a quarter-second off (43.25 s) differs by 58.7/255. On the held boot title the glow-box mean swings 26.0 <-> 37.7. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF |
||
|
Sylpheed port agent
|
f8a8d17327 |
port: the ring spins, the plate needs no constant, and rest.t was never the settle
Two milestones' known-wrong bits, both now answered by the RE agent, both taken. P5 -- the focus ring. It was drawn at 0 with a comment saying so. The period is now measured (continuous spin, eight evenly spaced autocorrelation peaks over nine revolutions, no angle estimated anywhere) and it needs NO authored constant: the period is the element's own declared t=120, and what the measurement adds is only that the turn repeats rather than stopping -- which "groups hold" could not decide, because 0 and 360 are the same pose. `spin_period_units` is structural and narrow on purpose: two keyframes, differing in nothing but rotation_deg, by a full 360, first timed and second untimed. 16 of 212 elements in this export match and all 16 are focus rings, zero false positives. That check is the point -- the measurement was taken on ONE button of ONE screen, and a rule that caught anything else would be extrapolating it to elements nobody watched. Verified on the port's own render with the RE agent's own control: bit-identical one period apart across the whole frame, 3.6/255 inside the ring's box at quarter-period steps, and box luminance conserved to 0.027 % over eight phases -- which is the observable they used to separate rotation from a pulse. Not claimed: direction (no signed angle was ever measured) and phase across a focus change (their run held focus throughout). P3 -- the plate. Last iteration I refuted their authoring instruction and shipped it anyway rather than pick between two of their numbers. The refutation held and the answer came back better than either option I offered: AUTHOR NOTHING. Both builds run on one clock started together and the plate arrives at its own declared t=238. The 2.13 s constant is deleted. The premise that failed was mine: rest.t IS NOT WHEN A SCREEN SETTLES. It is the last hold keyframe before the exit. ptlogo1 stops MOVING at t=42 and then creeps 5 px and 31 alpha steps to t=251. Reading rest.t put build 4's arrival at 4.350 s instead of 1.967 s, and the "2.51 s, which is not a landmark of anything" I sent them is that error wearing a decimal point. 238 - 118 = 120 units = 2.000 s against a measured 2.135 s at 28.1 fps presentation. Checked against my own export before touching anything. `ScreenView.settle_time()` still uses rest.t, and so the boot sequencer paces every screen off the wrong landmark. NOT changed here: "visible arrival" is a heuristic and getting it wrong re-paces everything. Filed, and asked for a timed boot instead now that their oracle is live. REFUTATION: two of their pages measure the same declared 120 units of wall clock during a static hold and disagree by 2 % -- plate 2.135 s (28.10 fps implied), ring 2.177 s (27.56 fps). That is seven times the plate page's own 6 ms run-to-run agreement, and it lands on the argument that page uses to justify itself: "the build-in is where frames are dropped; the static hold is not". Also the ring page's band, 27.6-28.8 fps, does not contain its own measurement -- the mean needs 27.56 and four of seven spacings are outside. Filed, not worked around: my port uses the declared 120 units either way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WM5XL4HfrHuxz8RiMWdCMC |
||
|
Sylpheed port agent
|
eef45ecfd6 |
port: P5 -- the menus navigate, and the focus ring is drawn wrong on purpose
P5's gate is "a human clicks through it". The artifact is a scripted walk that
proves the wiring rather than the intent -- up (wraps 01->05), five down, (A)
into EXTRAS, down, (B) back, landing on the main menu with focus RESTORED to
EXTRAS, ten PNGs one per settled step:
xvfb-run -a godot --path port -- --menu \
--script=up,down,down,down,down,down,accept,down,cancel --shots=/tmp/p5
--script posts InputEventAction through Input.parse_input_event so the presses
arrive at _unhandled_input exactly as a d-pad's would. Calling MenuFlow directly
would have been shorter and would have proved nothing: the wiring between a
press and the cursor is the part most likely to be broken, and a direct call is
exactly the part that skips it.
Derived vs authored, which P5 is the easiest place to blur:
* DERIVED -- the ORDER of the items, from each screen file's `buttons`, which
the exporter already fills from button-role elements sorted by resting Y.
* AUTHORED -- destinations, initial focus, what (B) does, and left/right being
a no-op. All measured off the running game (HANDOFF Q4/Q5) or chosen, none
on the disc, all in authored/flow.json with a why.
Four of five main-menu destinations are `goto: null` with a `blocked` note. That
is a MILESTONE BOUNDARY, not an unknown -- DIFFICULTY, the save list, the lesson
list and OPTIONS were all measured and live in archives this export does not
carry. `blocked` and `none` are kept apart so nobody later "discovers" the gap.
--headless CANNOT DRAW, and the port hung instead of saying so.
Measured, not assumed: under --headless Godot's dummy renderer never emits
RenderingServer.frame_post_draw, so every capture path awaited it forever --
--capture since P1, --film since P3, --shots as of now. With stdout block-
buffered the observable behaviour was SILENCE, FOREVER, which in a loop reads as
a job still working. Isolated by `--quit` (prints, exits 0) vs `--capture` (zero
bytes, killed at 40 s). Now those three flags refuse at STARTUP naming the
xvfb-run line that works, and --script no longer waits for a frame it is not
going to photograph -- so headless walks the menus in 4.5 s as a cheap
regression check needing no X server.
REFUTATION ATTEMPT, against the Decoder's
|
||
|
MechaCat02
|
65cefa74c3 |
monorepo: one repository for the decoders, the port and the corpus
Some checks failed
Merges the Godot port into the reverse-engineering repository, preserving both
histories -- 1019 commits of corpus plus the port's 31, brought in by subtree
merge and then moved into place so git can follow each file across the rename.
The reason is not tidiness. The two-repo split forced the exporter to depend on
the decoders by pinned revision, and that created a whole class of failure that
now disappears: a sha reachable only from a topic branch, orphaned by a
squash-merge, breaking a fresh checkout silently at build time. It also forced a
live read-only mount of one agent's working tree into another's container, which
is why a contract file could move mid-iteration. With a path dependency, a
decoder change and the exporter change it requires land in the same commit or
not at all.
Canary stays separate: it is a fork tracking upstream.
New structure for the long term:
docs/game/ how the game is NAVIGATED -- menus, modals, prompts, alerts,
and in-game flight. Written so nobody rediscovers it. Mostly
open questions on purpose; the in-game tutorials are the
resource for the flight half.
docs/port/MODDING.md
modding as a constraint on the exporter TODAY, not a later
feature: one logical asset in one file (the disc splits nearly
everything, and resolving that is the exporter's job), names a
person recognises, PNG/OGG/OGV/JSON only, base-and-overrides so
re-exporting is always safe, provenance in every file.
data/base + data/mods
generated tree and drop-in overrides, both gitignored
exchange/ transient inter-agent files, deliberately outside history
docs/agents/ the team protocol
Both the README and the navigation doc lead with the correction that cost the
most: the oracle is the real game under Xenia Canary. Reborn's renderer is a
hypothesis under test, it has been wrong, and treating it as ground truth
propagated into three documents and both agents before a human caught it.
Scripted modding stays possible without being built: no screen name is hardcoded
in GDScript and there is no native code in port/, which is what Godot Mod Loader
needs to be able to substitute behaviour later.
|