# The settle-instant pose's OWN failure mode, censused. 2026-08-30. # examples/settle_midramp_census.rs # # The port agent found ptmsg -- the main menu's footer -- at alpha 127.5 of 255 # at that screen's settle instant, because the longest keyframe-free interval # ends exactly as the footer arrives. VERIFIED here: build 5's window is # [44, 56] = 12 units, instant 50, and screen render --settle ALREADY PRINTS # 'narrow -- this bundle may never settle'. # # 'Mid-ramp' = at the settle instant the element sits strictly inside an # interval whose endpoint poses DIFFER: it is interpolating, not held. # window bundles elements mid-ramp share < 10 896 3571 1460 40.9% 10–19 478 1755 791 45.1% 20–29 281 935 297 31.8% 30–59 393 4084 476 11.7% >= 60 265 3646 548 15.0% ALL 2313 13991 3572 25.5% --- END (if this line is missing, the run did not finish) --- # # 🔴 AND THE OBVIOUS READING OF THAT TABLE IS WRONG. 'Narrow window means the # settle pose is bad' is refuted by the screens that motivated the proposal: # # build 4 title window 76 wide port: settle wins 9x # build 5 main menu window 12 narrow port: settle loses 1.2x # build 6 EXTRAS window 12 narrow port: confounded # build 10 publisher window 8 NARROWER port: settle wins 75x # build 11 developer window 8 NARROWER port: settle wins 33x # build 0 loading window 4 narrowest # # The two splashes have an 8-unit window -- narrower than the main menu's 12 -- # and the settle pose beats rest() there by 75x and 33x. So width does not # predict quality, and I nearly published that it did. # # The predictor is the one the port already stated: the settle pose wins # DECISIVELY where rest() lands on a transient's PEAK (the splashes: rest() # returns a=212 / a=255 on flashes that are over by t=45), and loses SLIGHTLY # where rest() is already sound and an element arrives after the window closes # (the menus: the footer caught at a=127). Those are independent of width. # # 🔴 AND MY OWN FILTER WAS WRONG IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. rest_vs_settle dropped # bundles with a window under 10 units. That admitted the 10-19 bucket, which # is the WORST at 45.1 % mid-ramp -- and it EXCLUDED the two splashes at width # 8, which are the strongest evidence FOR the proposal. A threshold chosen # from a documented rule of thumb, applied without checking which screens it # admitted and which it threw away.