The mounts landed but the agent could not learn of them: I documented them in CONTAINER-NOTES.md, which the decoder's prompt does not list, and then restarted the container -- so a fresh session with no memory of the exchange had a 586 MB database and a decompressed image sitting unmentioned in its filesystem. Now in the PROMPT itself, not only in a document, because the prompt is the one thing a new session is guaranteed to read. CONTAINER-NOTES.md is also added to its reading list. And the caveat that matters more than the asset. The .pe is PRIMARY -- the bytes the console executed. The database is somebody's ANALYSIS of them, produced by a disassembler that had to guess, and it is wrong in the ways disassemblers are wrong: misdecoded mnemonics where data was read as code, function boundaries short or long or merged or split, coverage missing entirely for code reached only by indirect dispatch, and names that are derived rather than symbols. So a finding resting on a database row is not established until the bytes agree: read the same address out of the .pe and check. Where they disagree the image wins, and the disagreement is itself worth recording, because it tells the next reader which parts of the database to distrust. A fast index into 9.2 MB of machine code, not a source of truth.
6.1 KiB
Notes for an agent working inside this container
Read this before starting a dynamic-RE run. Everything here is something that already went wrong once.
The container fixes three old traps for you
- The display outlives the turn. Xvfb and openbox are children of PID 1, not of your shell. The old "Xvfb dies on its own every few minutes" note is gone — you no longer have to wrap a whole session in one blocking foreground call to keep it alive.
- The toolchain is real.
tools/re-capture/rebuild_canary.shexists because the old box had no cmake/ninja/clang and only runtime sonames, so it hand- relinked object files. Do not use it here. Usebuild-canary. - numpy and Pillow are installed.
entities2.py,flight_probe.pyand the image oracles work. Their absence used to look like a logic bug.
Method (the part that matters more than the tooling)
- Measure the oracle; never infer it. A session with zero Canary runs is a red flag.
- Trace upstream to where data first goes wrong, rather than patching the symptom you can see.
- Try to refute before believing. Record demotions rather than editing them
away —
docs/re/README.mdhas the ✅/🟡/❔ convention, and a withdrawn result is more useful than a quietly deleted one. - A probe that never performs the action will "prove" the action does not exist. The "targeting is automatic" conclusion came from a sweep that only ever tapped once; target select is Ⓐ pressed twice.
- Do not poll faster than the guest updates — it manufactures a clean curve
out of noise.
rate-curve-aliased-BAD.csvis committed as the bad example.
Running the emulator
run-canary # correct audio/pad/display flags baked in
pad.py tap A ; pad.py dpad down # scripted input (--hid=file, no uinput)
screenshot ~/shots/now.png # cropped to the GAME surface, not the window
python3 tools/re-capture/gmem.py find hex:820af844 400
- One emulator at a time.
run-canaryenforces it with a lockfile. - Boot is slow cold, ~25 s once the shader/code caches are warm — so a launch-and-dump fits in a single call.
- Screens: classify by whole-image statistics (
screen_id.py), not named pixels. Named-pixel oracles are only valid while the game image sits at a known place, and nothing errors when it moves.
Verifying your own work
- Reborn's disc-gated tests self-skip without
SYLPHEED_DISC. A green run with it unset means almost nothing.build-reborn testwires it up for you. - Prefer a headless self-verify over "it compiles":
sylpheed-cli mesh render,screen render,save infoall produce checkable artifacts. - A Bevy system-parameter conflict is invisible to the type checker and panics at startup. If you touch viewer systems, run the binary, don't just build it.
Reporting
State what you measured, what you assumed, and what you could not settle. If a result is withdrawn, say so and keep the reasoning — that is the corpus's whole convention, and the reason its numbers can be trusted.
The static-analysis corpus — mounted, not reproducible
Two things arrive read-only from the host because nothing in this repository can produce them yet:
| path | what | env |
|---|---|---|
/xenia-rs/sylpheed.db |
the disassembly database, 586 MB | SYLPHEED_DB |
/image/sylpheed.pe |
the decompressed image, flat VA dump | SYLPHEED_PE |
The .pe is a flat VA dump: file offset = VA - 0x82000000
(SYLPHEED_IMAGE_BASE). So reading 0x820A1630 is seek(0xA1630) — no XEX
decrypt, no LZX, and no booted emulator. An earlier belief that this file was
stale was tested and refuted; it is current.
Recovering the image by dumping /dev/shm/xenia_memory_* also works and
self-validates, but it needs a running emulator — a poor dependency for
something the whole static corpus rests on. Use the file.
The database is far richer than the four scripts that read it use:
functions 25 481 address, name, end_address, frame_size,
saved_gprs, is_leaf, pdata_validated, has_eh
classes 851 name, vtable_address, rtti_present, base_classes_json
imports 398 library, ordinal, name, address
eh_funcinfo / eh_try_blocks 2 588 / 315
function_pointer_arrays 1 526 + 8 568 entries
indirect_dispatch_candidates 1 827 297 dispatch_pc, vtable_address, method_address
instructions.raw is an INT, not hex — a trap this corpus has already paid
for. Query with python3 -c 'import duckdb'; it is not SQLite.
⚠️ It is derived data, and it is wrong in places
The image is primary — those are the bytes the console executed. The database is an analysis of them, produced by a disassembler that had to guess, and it fails the way disassemblers fail:
- misdecoded mnemonics — data read as code, or a decoder-table gap, produces a plausible instruction that was never executed as one;
- wrong function boundaries —
end_addressshort or long, neighbours merged, one function split in two; - incomplete coverage — code reached only through indirect dispatch may be
absent entirely; the 1.8 M
indirect_dispatch_candidatesare candidates; - invented names — largely derived rather than symbols, so a name is a hypothesis wearing a label.
A finding resting on a database row is not established until the bytes agree.
Read the same address out of the .pe and check. Where they disagree the image
wins, and the disagreement is worth recording — it tells the next reader which
parts of the database to distrust.
It is a fast index into 9.2 MB of machine code. It is not a source of truth.
These mounts are reference material, not a deliverable
They are read-only and they come from outside the repository, which means a
fresh checkout on another machine has neither. Reimplementing the producer —
XEX decrypt + LZX decompress, and the disassembly-to-database step — belongs in
crates/sylpheed-formats. Until then, every static finding rests on an
artefact this project cannot rebuild, and that is a real gap in the corpus rather
than a convenience.