Sylpheed/authored/timing.json

{
 "format": "sylpheed.timing/1",
 "keyframe_units_per_second": 60,
 "why": [
  "HANDOFF Q1. The disc says a keyframe is at `t=30`; it does not say what a",
  "`t` is. The unit was MEASURED off the running game, not decoded: a declared",
  "15-unit fade lands on round(255*k/15) for all seven of its samples with k",
  "stepping 2,4,6,8,10,12,14 on seven consecutive submitted frames -- so 2",
  "units per rendered frame -- and the idle title presents at 28.3-28.8 fps,",
  "a 30 Hz game, giving 60 units per second. A second line agrees: the",
  "transition quad is declared black for 12 units, and a capture measured the",
  "pure-black plateau at 0.17-0.23 s, where 12/60 = 0.20 s.",
  "",
  "Expressed as units-per-second rather than seconds-per-unit so the value is",
  "exact rather than a repeating decimal a reader has to recognise.",
  "",
  "DELETE THIS FILE when a field on the disc is found that states the unit.",
  "Nothing here is on the disc.",
  "",
  "🔴 DO NOT 'CORRECT' THIS AGAINST AN EMULATOR FRAME RATE. A draw-stream",
  "measurement on 2026-08-29 found the presented units-per-frame rising 33 % over",
  "a single boot (1.765 early, 2.357 late) and three independent readings of one",
  "container's rate disagreeing with each other. That is the EMULATOR's",
  "presentation pacing drifting, and no single units-per-frame figure describes a",
  "run there.",
  "",
  "60 is a different quantity: the GAME's logical unit rate, measured off the",
  "running game as HANDOFF Q1 (a declared t=30 landing on the linear value at",
  "every one of seven sampled frames). The port renders at its own frame rate and",
  "converts through this constant, so guest pacing cannot reach it. The two",
  "numbers are not comparable and one is not evidence about the other.",
  "",
  "🔴 2026-09-01 — THE FIRST LEG ABOVE IS RETIRED. THE VALUE IS NOT.",
  "",
  "'2 units per rendered frame ... a 30 Hz game, giving 60 units per second' is a",
  "FRAME-COUNT derivation, and the Decoder retired that mechanism the same day",
  "(docs/re/units-per-second-measured.md): the same animation takes 21 frame",
  "labels in one capture and 33 in another, and one splash logo steps +136,+34 in",
  "one run and +17,+51,+34,+34,+17,+17 in the other. A fixed per-frame increment",
  "cannot do that. The clock is TIME-INTEGRATED, not frame-counted, so `units =",
  "2 x frames` computes an emulator artefact. The 2 was that run's frame pacing.",
  "",
  "✅ The port's RUNTIME was already right: `boot.gd` advances",
  "`time_units += delta * units_per_second`, off delta time. Nothing in this port",
  "derives a unit from a frame count. Audited 2026-09-01, and it is why the",
  "retirement cost a justification and not a behaviour.",
  "",
  "✅ AND THE SECOND LEG NEVER TOUCHED A FRAME COUNT, which is why 60 survives:",
  "the transition quad is declared black for 12 units and the capture bracketed",
  "the pure-black plateau at 0.14-0.30 s (title-plate-delay-measured.md, at a",
  "0.125 s sampling resolution). 12 units in 0.14-0.30 s is 40-86 units/s. That",
  "is a declared unit count against a wall-clock duration, with no frames in the",
  "chain -- and it EXCLUDES 120 units/s, which would need 0.10 s.",
  "",
  "✅ MEASURED DIRECTLY 2026-09-01: 56.8 units per guest second, control passing",
  "at 1.15 %, from two elements agreeing at one clock (`ptbtn00` 657.9 alpha/s,",
  "`ptcopyright` 650.4 alpha/s, which puts ptcopyright's segment at T = 22.25 --",
  "a rate agreement AND a round declared length). 30 and 120 are both excluded.",
  "",
  "60 IS KEPT. 56.8 is 5.6 % away against a ~5 % quantisation resolution, so it",
  "does not refute 60, and the Decoder explicitly did not ask for a change. The",
  "reach is the TITLE: the splashes are a different GamePart and nothing yet shows",
  "they tick at the same rate.",
  "",
  "⚠️ If anyone re-fits this from alpha: DROP THE LAST STEP of a ramp. It clamps",
  "at 255 and reports more elapsed time than it consumed -- worth 4 % on the plate.",
  "",
  "🔴 2026-09-01 (later) — A PER-SCREEN RATE WAS PROPOSED AND NOT ADOPTED.",
  "",
  "docs/re/splash-declared-vs-captured.md proposes ~57 units/s for the title and",
  "~35-40 for the splashes, i.e. that one constant cannot be right and that a",
  "splash at 60 runs 1.5-1.7x too fast. THE PORT DID NOT MOVE, and the reason is",
  "arithmetic on a measurement already cited in this file:",
  "",
  "  the 160-unit hold is the DEVELOPER splash's a=255 plateau, t=30..190, and it",
  "  is measured at 4.514 s. The 210-unit group CONTAINING it is measured at",
  "  3.37/3.50/3.51 s over three cold boots (the dwell_why block below). A",
  "  sub-interval cannot outlast the interval containing it.",
  "",
  "The same three boots put the splashes at 57.7 and 60.7 units/s -- corroborating",
  "60 on exactly the two screens the new figure puts at 35-39. At 35.4 the declared",
  "groups would run 5.93 s and 7.20 s against corpus dwells of 3.37-3.51 and",
  "4.30-4.60, i.e. each splash ~70 % longer than measured.",
  "",
  "⚠️ DO NOT ADOPT EITHER NUMBER UNTIL THAT IS RESOLVED, and do not split the",
  "difference -- averaging two measurements that cannot both be true is not a",
  "third measurement. docs/port/splash-rate-contradiction.md, asked as BLOCKED H7.",
  "",
  "⚠️ AND THE STRUCTURAL CLAIM MAY STILL BE RIGHT. 'One rate cannot cover every",
  "screen' is a claim about the format, and the title's 56.8 does sit ~5 % off the",
  "splashes' 58-61. If a per-screen rate is real this file should carry a MECHANISM",
  "-- a field or a GamePart constant -- not two authored numbers. The Decoder has",
  "'where the per-GamePart rate comes from' as its next item.",
  "",
  "🔴 2026-09-01 (later still) — RECLASSIFIED measured -> authored. THE VALUE DOES",
  "NOT MOVE; THE LABEL WAS FALSE.",
  "",
  "The Decoder withdrew their guest-frame-rate finding the same day they published",
  "it. ⚠️ THAT DOCUMENT IS NOT IN THIS CHECKOUT -- it is `guest-frame-rate-WITHDRAWN.md`",
  "on their branch, named here in prose deliberately rather than in `source`:",
  "`audit-kinds` flagged the first version of this entry DANGLING because I cited",
  "a file I cannot read, which is exactly the check doing its job. The reading",
  "below is from their message and is labelled as such.",
  "It read the guest's presentation as 30 fps from a movie-frame ruler and",
  "concluded 2 x 30 = 60. This file carried `kind: measured` on that strength.",
  "`kind: measured` on the strength of it. It cannot any more.",
  "",
  "Three routes now disagree and at most one can be right:",
  "",
  "  withdrawn movie cadence          60 units/s",
  "  vblank cadence (Xenia, 60 Hz)   ~120",
  "  title-plate-delay, 120 units      ~56   -- two runs agreeing to 6 ms",
  "",
  "⚠️ 60 IS KEPT ANYWAY, and it is not a coin toss between the three. The one leg",
  "of this file's own reasoning that never touched a frame count still stands and",
  "still brackets it: the transition quad is declared black for 12 units and the",
  "capture measured the plateau at 0.14-0.30 s, i.e. 40-86 units/s. 60 sits inside",
  "that; 120 does not. And ~56 is 7 % from 60, inside the same bracket.",
  "",
  "So the honest statement is: 60 is AUTHORED, bracketed by one surviving",
  "frame-free measurement, and consistent with the nearest of the three live",
  "routes. It is no longer 'measured', and anything that cited it as measured is",
  "citing a withdrawal.",
  "",
  "📌 THE METHOD NOTE IS WORTH MORE THAN THE NUMBER, and it is the Decoder's: their",
  "pre-registration named three ways the ruler could lie and guarded two. The third",
  "occurred, and a PERFECT 1.0000 is exactly what it produces -- a triple buffer",
  "rotating once per present gives run-length 1 at any frame rate. Both guards",
  "tested how the buffer was READ, neither tested whether a change meant a decode.",
  "",
  "  A clean result on an instrument whose key assumption is unguarded is not",
  "  confirmation. The cleanness may be the failure mode's own signature.",
  "",
  "Same family as this port's non-inverting latch check, which passed for the wrong",
  "reason until its control failed.",
  "",
  "🔴 2026-09-01 — THE 12-UNIT BRACKET ABOVE IS WITHDRAWN. IT EXCLUDES NOTHING.",
  "",
  "I kept 60 on the ground that '12 declared units measured at 0.14-0.30 s gives",
  "40-86 units/s, so 120 is excluded'. The Decoder refuted it and the refutation",
  "holds on arithmetic I checked myself:",
  "",
  "  the source doc says of that number, in its own words, 'at a sampling",
  "  resolution (0.125 s) that cannot do better'. 120 units/s predicts 12 units in",
  "  0.100 s -- BELOW one sample interval. A 0.125 s sampler cannot resolve it and",
  "  reports about one sample, ~0.125-0.14 s. The 0.14 s low end is the",
  "  INSTRUMENT'S FLOOR, and 12/0.14 = 85.7 is an upper bound produced by dividing",
  "  by a floored duration. It is the value 120 predicts once the sampler is",
  "  accounted for.",
  "",
  "🔴 AND THE DEEPER ERROR IS MINE, NOT THE ARITHMETIC. I argued the leg survived",
  "because it 'never touched a frame count'. True, and INSUFFICIENT: every",
  "wall-clock duration off Canary is true/speed_factor, so apparent units/s =",
  "true x speed -- and the speed factor is precisely what makes the three routes",
  "disagree. I checked the leg for the WRONG CONTAMINANT. Frame-free is not",
  "clock-free, and on this emulator clock-free is the property that matters.",
  "",
  "What actually survives from that leg, and it is the half I did not lead with:",
  "the declared 12 units are independently confirmed as SIX FRAMES by",
  "screen-transitions.md's 255/6-per-frame ramp. No wall clock in it at all. That",
  "is evidence about units per FRAME -- which was never in dispute -- and silent",
  "about units per second.",
  "",
  "SO 60 HAS NO SURVIVING BRACKET. It stays because nothing supports 120 either and",
  "moving a shipped timeline on no evidence is worse than leaving it. That is a",
  "default, not a derivation, and this entry now says so. `kind` is already",
  "`authored`, which is the honest label for a default.",
  "",
  "🟡 2026-09-01 — 120 units/s IS NOW MEASURED, AND THIS PORT HAS NOT MOVED.",
  "",
  "The Decoder's content-hash experiment gives 120 (2 units/present x 60",
  "presents/s), with the controls the withdrawn version lacked -- a static texture",
  "hashing constant, 1 change in 403 samples, and movie luma not constant, 102",
  "distinct hashes. Pre-registered bands, and the observed 0.5739 falls inside",
  "them. It is a better experiment than either of the two it replaces.",
  "",
  "IT IS ALSO THEIR THIRD POSITION ON THIS NUMBER IN ONE DAY, reach is one boot,",
  "and they said themselves that a second independent boot before a timeline is",
  "rewritten is the defensible call. Agreed. 60 stays for now.",
  "",
  "⚠️ 60 IS NOT DEFENDED EITHER -- its bracket was withdrawn this morning. Both",
  "numbers are undefended; the port keeps the one it ships because switching on a",
  "single capture is a worse failure than holding on none. That is the whole",
  "reasoning and it is not evidence about the game.",
  "",
  "✅ AUDITED, SO THE SWITCH IS CHEAP WHEN IT COMES: no seconds are baked into the",
  "timeline anywhere. Every second this port prints or acts on is computed as",
  "units / keyframe_units_per_second at the point of use. audio.json's loop_start_s",
  "and loop_end_s ARE seconds and correctly do NOT follow this constant -- they are",
  "positions in an audio file with no keyframe unit in them.",
  "",
  "🔴 One exception found and fixed: tools/port/verify-dwell read black_hold_units",
  "from this file 'so it cannot drift again' and then divided by a literal 60.0.",
  "The value could not drift; the conversion could.",
  "",
  "📌 THE FALSIFIER IS PRE-REGISTERED in docs/port/units-per-second-switch-readiness.md:",
  "at 120 the publisher splash runs 2.13 s and the developer 1.75 s, against three",
  "cold boots measuring 4.30/4.60/4.37 and 3.51/3.50/3.37. 120 and the dwell corpus",
  "cannot both be right in wall-clock seconds -- the same collision that killed the",
  "35 units/s proposal from the other direction."
 ],
 "kind": "authored",
 "source": "docs/re/ui-keyframe-time-unit.md, docs/port/HANDOFF.md",
 "ramp": "linear",
 "ramp_why": [
  "Also HANDOFF Q1, and part of the same measurement: the fade lands on the",
  "linear value at every one of the seven sampled frames, so there is no ease."
 ],
 "ramp_kind": "measured",
 "dwell_seconds": null,
 "dwell_why": [
  "NOT SET -- because the dwell is DECLARED, and the port already plays it.",
  "",
  "This key has now been wrong in two opposite directions, and the second was",
  "mine, so both are recorded.",
  "",
  "It first said 'a screen's dwell is its OWN keyframe group'. Then GP_TITLE",
  "build 4 was measured dwelling ~1100 presented frames against a declared ~120,",
  "and I generalised that into 'the boot is KNOWN TOO FAST [refuted] on both splashes'.",
  "🔴 THAT WAS AN OVER-CORRECTION and it is withdrawn. Build 4 is the title: its",
  "exit is caused by something outside its timeline, so it holds. A splash's exit",
  "is caused by nothing, so it plays its declared timeline and leaves. The title",
  "is the exception, not the rule, and one screen was never enough to overturn",
  "the other two.",
  "",
  "MEASURED 2026-08-29 by the Decoder over 3 cold boots",
  "(docs/re/structures/boot-splash-dwells-are-declared.md):",
  "",
  "  publisher  declared t=0..255 = 4.250 s   corpus 4.30 / 4.60 / 4.37",
  "  developer  declared t=0..210 = 3.500 s   corpus 3.51 / 3.50 / 3.37",
  "",
  "The developer agrees to 1.1 %, two of its three runs to 0.3 %.",
  "",
  "🔴 CORRECTED 2026-09-01. This said: 'The port emits 4.400 s and 3.650 s -- each",
  "declared value plus the 9-unit black hold, exactly. So the pacing was right all",
  "along and nothing changes in the code.' THE PORT DOES NOT DO THAT, and this",
  "file is what stops it: `black_hold_units` is 0, set deliberately (see",
  "black_hold_why -- a uniform value is positively excluded and only an",
  "ordered-pair key survives). There is no 9-unit hold to add, so the sentence",
  "described a behaviour asserted three keys above it and refused one key below.",
  "",
  "MEASURED off the shipping boot, three runs, 2026-09-01:",
  "",
  "  publisher  declared 255 units = 4.250 s   4.28 / 4.26 / 4.27  mean 4.270 s",
  "  developer  declared 210 units = 3.500 s   3.50 / 3.57 / 3.51  mean 3.527 s",
  "",
  "Residuals +1.2 and +1.6 units -- frame granularity on the exit check, not a",
  "hold. The claimed 4.400 and 3.650 are each ~0.13 s longer than what has been",
  "shipping since P3. Against the corpus (4.42 and 3.46 means) neither the claimed",
  "nor the measured figure dominates: the port is 3.4 % short on the publisher and",
  "2.0 % long on the developer, the claim would be 0.5 % short and 5.5 % long. So",
  "this corrects a false statement about our own behaviour; it does not settle",
  "whether a hold belongs there. That is still black_hold_why's ordered-pair ask.",
  "",
  "🔴 AND THE UNIT STAYS UNITS, NOT SECONDS. The same two dwells timed in the",
  "Decoder's own container came out 15-20 % LONGER than both the declared values",
  "and the corpus -- same disc, same timeline -- and three independent readings",
  "of that container's rate disagree with each other. A seconds figure records",
  "one emulator's pacing on one run. The units are on the disc. If anything ever",
  "goes in `dwell` it is an extra hold in UNITS, and only for a screen that is",
  "measured to wait beyond its group."
 ],
 "dwell_kind": "measured",
 "looping_focus_records": {
  "_": [
   "WHICH focus records the port draws, unconditionally and on a loop, OVER the",
   "element's own sprite rather than instead of it.",
   "",
   "RESTORED 2026-08-30 on a MEASUREMENT, having been deleted on 2026-08-29 for",
   "a real defect that was in the RENDERER, not in this table. The old entry made",
   "`_draw` substitute the glow for the plate's own bright sprite, so the plate",
   "was invisible at every instant (max 0 against max 252.5). `ScreenView` now",
   "draws the base and the record over it, and the entry comes back."
  ],
  "press_start/ptbtn00": {
   "record_element": "ptbtn00f",
   "period_units": 120,
   "kind": "measured",
   "source": "docs/re/structures/plate-pulse-measured.md, RE agent 2026-08-30",
   "why": [
    "MEASURED off the running game, held at the title with NO INPUT: the plate",
    "oscillates continuously -- two windows in one boot of 58 s and 57 s, about",
    "23 cycles each, with no decay and no settling.",
    "",
    "🔴 IT NEVER GOES OFF. The plate-absent floor is 159 thresholded green",
    "pixels -- the title art's own, measured on live-title-build4-no-plate.png --",
    "and the pulse bottoms at 714, four and a half times that. So `ptbtn00`",
    "going transparent at t=244 is not the end of the plate; that is its EXIT",
    "ramp, which plays when the screen leaves. While the screen is held the base",
    "sits at its own hold (alpha 255 at t=238) and `ptbtn00f`'s cycle runs over",
    "it. Base-only and base-plus-glow are what the 714 and the 1520 are.",
    "",
    "⚠️ 120 UNITS, NOT SECONDS, and that is the RE agent's own instruction. Their",
    "run measured 2.530 and 2.540 s; an earlier corpus run measured 2.24 s. Same",
    "declared number, different emulator pacing -- x1.27 and x1.12 against a",
    "nominal 2.000 s, which IS 120 units at 60 units/s. Hardcoding 2.5 s would",
    "author one loaded container's clock."
   ],
   "limits": [
    "ONE BOOT. Two windows inside it are not two boots.",
    "It does NOT distinguish the boot title from an attract-loop title: run 1",
    "opens at t~255 s against Q9's ~193 s no-input baseline, so it may already",
    "be the attract title. Both are 'the title, held, no input' -- which is what",
    "was asked -- but it is not proof about the first appearance.",
    "🔴 714/1520 IS NOT AN ALPHA RATIO. The counter is thresholded pixels, so dim",
    "pixels drop out first. No duty cycle and no ramp shape may be read off it;",
    "the port draws the record's own declared alpha ramp and infers nothing."
   ]
  }
 },
 "exit_ramp_deleted_why": [
  "DELETED 2026-08-29, and the deletion is the point.",
  "",
  "`exit_ramp_seconds` (~0.4 s) and `exit_ramp_units` (24) were AUTHORED because",
  "the disc had no time slot on a group's final keyframe, so the ramp into it was",
  "the one unknown duration per screen. Under the corrected record layout",
  "(formats-pin-2026-08-29c onward) there IS no untimed keyframe -- a group is an",
  "8-byte header then frames x {u32 time; 36-byte pose}, so every pose is timed",
  "including the last. The unknown the constant stood in for does not exist.",
  "",
  "MISSION section 3: 'When the RE agent later decodes something you had",
  "authored, delete the authored entry and let the exporter emit it. That",
  "deletion is the measure of progress.'",
  "",
  "VERIFIED DEAD BEFORE DELETING, not assumed: setting it to 9999 (166 seconds)",
  "changed the boot's transitions by 0.04 s -- wall-clock jitter, not a 166 s",
  "ramp. Both of its uses in ScreenView were gated on `not last_frame.has('t')`,",
  "which no longer fires on any of the export's 866 keyframes.",
  "",
  "The measurement it recorded is not lost: HANDOFF Q7's ~0.4 s fade-out and the",
  "0.17-0.23 s black hold are still measured facts, and the hold is still used --",
  "`tools/port/verify-dwell` compares a transition INTERVAL against the oracle's",
  "visible SPAN plus that hold. What is deleted is the port's need to invent a",
  "duration the disc now states."
 ],
 "black_hold_units": 0,
 "black_hold_why": [
  "0 = NOT MODELLED. The escalation is resolved: a uniform value is positively",
  "EXCLUDED, so 0 is no longer one option among several -- it is the only honest",
  "uniform choice, because it is the one that does not claim a constant exists.",
  "",
  "UPDATE: TWO candidate models are now excluded, not one. The Decoder has five",
  "replicates with NO variation -- title->menu 3,3,3 and EXTRAS->menu 2,2 -- and",
  "every differing value comes from a different ORDERED PAIR. The same origin",
  "gives different values to different destinations (menu 0 vs 1, EXTRAS 2 vs 3).",
  "So a constant is excluded AND keying on the outgoing screen is excluded; only",
  "an ordered-pair key survives, with a measured value needed per pair.",
  "",
  "I checked independently whether anything DECLARED predicts it, from the",
  "quantities in my export. None does: outgoing close (15,10,10,10), incoming",
  "clear (12,12,16,12), outgoing span (269,74,80,80) and incoming span",
  "(80,80,269,74) each have two rows sharing a value with different gaps.",
  "",
  "I did NOT search combinations of them. Four intra-archive pairs against many",
  "candidate two-screen functions fits by construction -- that is the error this",
  "corpus has catalogued five times, and finding a formula here would be",
  "indistinguishable from finding one in noise.",
  "",
  "The Decoder ordered the gaps by the screen being LEFT (frames): menu 0 and 1,",
  "EXTRAS 2, title 3. Three hypotheses are positively ruled out, not merely",
  "unsupported. DIRECTION: EXTRAS->menu (2) and menu->EXTRAS (1) are the same",
  "pair both ways and differ. BUTTON: (B) gives 0 and 2, (A) gives 1 and 3.",
  "INCOMING SCREEN: an incoming menu takes 3 from the title and 2 from EXTRAS.",
  "",
  "So the quantity varies 0-3 frames by outgoing screen, and any uniform non-zero",
  "value is wrong as a MODEL rather than merely off in magnitude. 0 models the",
  "gap as absent; 6 would model it as constant, which the data excludes.",
  "",
  "MY OWN RULE IS REFUTED, not just unadopted. It was gap + the incoming",
  "screen's opening black-clear = a constant, holding at 16/16/18 on three",
  "transitions. Their fourth gives 16, 14, 16, 18 -- and decisively, the two",
  "transitions with the SAME incoming screen (main_menu) have different gaps,",
  "so the incoming screen cannot determine it. A fourth point did to a",
  "three-point fit exactly what it should.",
  "",
  "DO NOT key this per outgoing screen yet. Three outgoing screens with one",
  "value each restates the data rather than predicting it -- the same objection",
  "I raised against my own 16/16/18. Key it when a screen has more than one",
  "measured value, and key it on the screen being LEFT.",
  "",
  "📌 CITATION ADDED 2026-09-01, and its absence propagated from the delivery.",
  "This why carried over a thousand characters and NOTHING OPENABLE. The Decoder",
  "sent the `(B)`-from-EXTRAS leg as an inline frame table with no file cited,",
  "while docs/re/data/fade-four-transitions.txt -- which carries that leg and",
  "eight others -- had been committed the whole time. They found it in their own",
  "audit and cited it; it had already landed here uncited.",
  "",
  "⚠️ An uncited measurement propagates as an uncited value. The receiving end",
  "cannot tell a summarised measurement from a recalled one, and both read as",
  "prose.",
  "",
  "✅ AUDITED 2026-09-01 and this one needed nothing: it was already an EXCLUSION argument rather than a count. It excludes a constant, excludes keying on the outgoing screen, and excludes every declared quantity in the export as a predictor -- four of them named, each shown not to separate the pairs. That is the form the week's other claims were found to be missing."
 ],
 "black_hold_kind": "measured"
}