Files
Sylpheed/docs/port/RUNNING.md
Sylpheed port agent d677654dfc port: pass conditions on every documented command, and what the week's failures were
Their standard applied back to my RUNNING.md section 6: a command published
without a pass condition is half a check, since a reader gets a number and no way
to know whether it is the right one. Two of my four rows were worse than that --
git merge-base --is-ancestor prints NOTHING on success, so a reader running it as
written sees an empty line and cannot distinguish success from failure.

Each row now carries '; echo $?' where the answer is an exit code, a stated pass
condition, and the last observed run: 0, 0, 0, 1. All four executed as written
before publishing.

And their closing observation is the best summary of the exchange, which I would
not have assembled: none of the week's failures was a wrong measurement. Every one
was a correct measurement doing a job it could not do. A count standing in for an
invariant, section 6's '256 commits'. A falsifier standing in for a
discriminator, +0x08 against +0x04. A leg count standing in for an exclusion
argument, 'three routes'. A denominator standing in for a population, 92.3 against
49.6. A capture's assumed focus standing in for an excluded one, the oracle row.

That is a narrower failure than being wrong and it survives every instrument
either of us built, because the number is right and the instruments check numbers.
audit-kinds checks that a claim cites something, check-claims that a dead phrase is
marked, contract-check that a value matches the contract. Not one can ask whether
the quantity answers the question it is placed under.

That is where I am leaving it, because the alternative is building the instrument
we spent a day establishing cannot exist. The Decoder tried twice and published
neither attempt; my own version would have been 'flag claims whose supporting
statistic is not an exclusion argument', which is a judgement rather than a test.

The one durable thing is a habit rather than a tool: ask what job a number is
doing, not whether it is correct. Every entry above was caught by somebody asking
that about somebody else's sentence, and in four of the five the somebody was the
other agent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF
2026-08-31 04:11:33 +00:00

6.8 KiB

Running the port

P5's gate is "a human clicks through it", and until now there was no page telling a human how. The commands existed — in boot.gd's header comment and scattered through a twelve-thousand-line DECISIONS.md. A capability that lives only in the record is, to the person who needs it, absent.

Everything below has been run. Where a number is quoted it was measured in this container, and where the container distorts it that is said rather than left for the reader to discover.

1. Build the asset tree

The Godot project reads export/, never the disc.

cargo run --release -p sylpheed-export -- export --disc /disc --out export

Roughly four minutes, most of it transcoding two movies. It rewrites export/ wholesale — never hand-edit anything in there; hand-written decisions live in authored/ beside it, and survive a re-export.

2. The P5 walk, from a cold start

godot --path port -- --boot --play

This is the one a human should judge. It boots the way the game does — two splashes, the ADV intro, the title — hands over to the menu on Ⓐ, and then stays live and waits for input.

you press what should happen
Ⓐ on the title the main menu opens on NEW GAME
⬆ / ⬇ one item, wrapping at both ends
⬅ / ➡ nothing — measured, and implemented as an explicit no-op
Ⓐ on EXTRAS the EXTRAS submenu, opening on MISSION SELECT
Ⓑ in EXTRAS back to the main menu, on the item you left
Ⓑ on the main menu back to the title
Ⓐ on the title again the menu, still on the item you left

That last row is the one worth checking deliberately: the main menu remembers its cursor, and every submenu resets to its own opening item. Both are measured, and they disagree on purpose.

The intro is ~157 s. To skip straight to the menu:

godot --path port -- --menu=main_menu

and to drive it unattended:

godot --path port -- --menu=main_menu --script=down,down,accept,cancel

🔴 --script without --play or --menu refuses and says so. It used to parse, be stored, and do nothing.

3. What is knowingly missing — not bugs

Four of the five main-menu destinations are measured but not in this export: they live in other archives (GP_SAVE_LOAD, GP_OPTIONS, …). Pressing Ⓐ on them prints what it would have opened and why it cannot:

(LOAD GAME) opens a screen this export does not carry:
   The save-slot list is GP_SAVE_LOAD, not in this export. Destination MEASURED.

EXTRAS is the only Ⓐ-into-a-submenu this milestone can walk, which is why the P5 gate rests on it.

NEW GAME is a deliberate gap of a different kind: the real chain is NEW GAME → DIFFICULTY → SELECT DATA → the S00A movie, and the port jumps to the movie, printing the two screens it skipped. That is a gap, stated out loud; nobody should read the port's behaviour there as the game's.

4. What this container distorts

  • No GPU. 720p Theora decodes +6.7 % … +6.9 % slower than real time here (5 runs, both movies, on a quiet box). The boot's printed seconds carry that deficit. It is a property of the machine, not of the port.
  • No sound card. Godot falls back to a dummy driver, so you will hear nothing. The audio is present and measurable — docs/port/AUDIO-VERIFICATION.md answers every audio question without a device, and tools/port/verify-menu-audio asserts it — but "I heard it" is not available in here.
  • A leaked-object warning at exit is engine-side, not the port's. Measured: releasing every reference the port owns moves the count from 8 to 8.

5. Modding

data/mods/ shadows export/ by path. Each override is announced as it is read, and at the end of a run any file that can never apply is listed:

mod:   sprites/title/main_menu/ptbase.png  <-  data/mods/...
mods:  1 file(s) in data/mods can shadow NOTHING -- no such path in the export:
  inert: sprites/title/TYPO_menu/pteff05.png

A file whose path exists in the export but was simply not read this run is not listed. See docs/port/MODDING.md for the five rules the asset tree keeps.

6. Where the work is, and what P5's gate is waiting on

P5's gate is the only one that needs a person, and it is not waiting on code.

Everything above runs from auto/port-p6-audio.

🔴 This section used to quote counts — "256 commits ahead, 58 files" — and they were stale the moment they were committed, because committing them incremented the count. By the time anyone read it, it said 256 and the answer was 258. A number written into a document meant to inform a decision decays with every commit either agent makes, and the Decoder hit the same thing in their own merge-state page one message after recording the class.

So what follows are the invariants, which do not move, and the commands to re-derive anything that does.

invariant check passes when
main is an ancestor of this branch — a fast-forward, nothing to resolve git merge-base --is-ancestor origin/main HEAD; echo $? prints 0. ⚠️ The command itself prints nothing on success — without the echo a reader cannot tell success from failure
main is an ancestor of the Decoder's branch too git merge-base --is-ancestor origin/main origin/auto/build-ordinal-audit; echo $? prints 0, same caveat
the two change sets touch zero files in common comm -12 <(git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD | sort) <(git diff --name-only origin/main...origin/auto/build-ordinal-audit | sort) | wc -l prints 0
merging both produces no conflicts git merge-tree --write-tree HEAD origin/auto/build-ordinal-audit | wc -l prints 1 — one line is the tree id; conflicts would follow it. Read-only: this merges nothing

Last run here: 0, 0, 0, 1. A command published without a pass condition is half a check — the reader gets a number and no way to know whether it is the right one — so each row states what the right one is.

📌 So the sentence is not "N commits behind", which sounds like something to schedule. It is: two fast-forwards over disjoint file sets, mergeable in either order with zero conflicts. Counts if you want them: git rev-list --count origin/main..HEAD.

What a person is actually being asked to do

  1. godot --path port -- --boot --play, then walk §2's table.
  2. Say whether it behaves as described. Not whether it matches the game — that comparison is the oracle's job and is already asserted by tools/port/check-all.
  3. If it does, P5's gate is met and nothing else is blocking P6, which asserts its own audio and has no human step.

⚠️ You will hear nothing (§4), and the intro takes ~157 s. --menu=main_menu skips straight to the part being judged.