Named by the port after hitting it twice in a fortnight -- a real 3.4 s seam
written up as the cost of a missing loop point when our own loop produced it, and
a real r=0.998 correlation written up as a duplicate when it was a
start-truncated simultaneous stream.
Distinct from everything else in this file, which is about broken or misspecified
instruments. Controls test whether a measurement is faithful and say nothing
about the clause that follows it. The defences that work are naming the
alternative explanation so it can be rejected, and noticing when a measurement
taken in OUR output is being used to make a claim about THE GAME.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
11dee240bd