Files
Sylpheed/docs
Sylpheed RE agent 1ed4d4b140 re: test the OB hypothesis's weak point statically -- it holds, but a premise was wrong
Decoded stage\UnitGroup_S02.tbl with the existing unitgroup.py (pure static, no
emulator; 111 squadrons, roster self-check 111/111).

The "four per squadron" premise was 16/4, a mean, and I flagged that 5/5/3/3 would
make the step-of-four a coincidence.  Measured: Stage 02 has NINE e010_Attacker_S
squadrons totalling 45 members, sized 4,4,4,6,4,6,4,9,4 -- not uniform across the
stage, but SIX of the nine hold exactly 4, and phase 1's share is independently
recorded as 4 groups / 16 craft = 4 x 4.  So the phase-1 squadrons are the n=4
ones and the step-of-four is a real size, not an averaging artifact.

But a premise of the note is refuted: ADN110/111/112, which I cited as the polled
squadrons arriving at t=170, are UN_e007_ADAN_Turret with n=9 -- TURRET squadrons,
not attackers.  That arrival evidence is about turrets and is withdrawn from the
argument.

Records the tension it exposes: mission-wave-arrivals.md calls ADN110/111/112 the
squadrons the phase-1 clear condition polls, while mission-objectives-text.md has
the phase-1 objective as the marked attackers.  Unresolved.
2026-08-27 00:55:27 +00:00
..