The port challenged HANDOFF's loading-screen row and was right. The Q2 row said
"0/1 and 10/11 are the LOADING screen"; the dated section above it says
"entries 0, 1, 12, 15". Both are true, in different index spaces, and the page
did not say which.
Verified against the bytes rather than the table:
screen list GP_TITLE.pak -> 12 builds, ordinals 0..11
screen list --all GP_TITLE.pak -> 16 builds, ordinals 0..15
Only under --all does the ordinal equal the pak entry. Without it ordinal 10 is
entry 12 and ordinal 11 is entry 15. `screen info --all --build 10` shows
palogo_sqex; --build 11 shows palogo_gamearts / seta / anima; 12 and 15 show
pgloading_*. So in ENTRY space 10/11 are the publisher and developer splashes,
which is exactly the screen the wrong reading would have renamed.
It would have validated silently: the port's screen_names.json is keyed by
entry. Q2 row corrected to entry space and marked; the trap is in METHOD under
"Mechanics that have bitten", with the rule that a number leaving this
repository says "entry N", never "build N".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QsEPXWVaEpyfudtR6re1Pd
10a57dcdd9