Refuted my own evidence with a direct test. The A-press fault page cited the
faulting run's dumped logged_profile_slot_0_xuid = "" as proof no profile was
signed in. Xenia prints its config dump BEFORE applying command-line overrides:
in a run launched with --apu=sdl --hid=file --mute=true --log_mask=13, the dump
says apu="any", hid="any", mute=false, log_mask=0. Four for four.
So the dump is a statement about xenia-canary.config.toml and nothing else, and
this page cannot know the faulting run's profile state. Anything in the corpus
citing a config dump as evidence of what a run did is making the same mistake;
to know a run's settings, record its argv.
Survives: the mechanism (swallow -> unbounded pump -> failed allocation ->
fault), which rests on the [RE-INPUT] counter and the crash dump's registers;
and canary-scripted-input-traps.md section 3's measured sign-in-dialog claim,
which has a capture behind it.
Also records the port's base-plus-glow mechanism for the plate, which explains
why the pulse floor is 714 rather than the plate-absent 159 -- ptbtn00's fade at
t=244 is an exit ramp so the base holds at 255 while the screen is held, and
ptbtn00f's 0->80->0 glow draws over it. Marked as agreeing with the measurement,
not confirming it: their renderer is not an oracle. It does rule out a glow-only
plate, which could not produce a non-zero floor.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
b6f0cf3fb2