864 records = 144 rule tables per language pack x 6. One schema for all 9216 event records; MessageCount*2 == positional count with zero mismatches. Named 136/144 by two independent routes that agree as sets. 2388/2405 message ids join the settled sound-cue table. Corrects squadron-orders.md: the executable misspells all four SQUADRON entries of the 0x820AEEB0 enum as ORDOR_, and the disc data matches. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
7.9 KiB
The reactive-chatter rule table
✅ Settled 2026-08-27 (static; regenerator
tools/re-capture/preset_messages.py, artefact
data/preset-messages.txt).
The corpus already knew that PresetMessage_* is reactive combat chatter —
ixud-localised-text.md names the IXUD family
("the bulk: reactive combat chatter keyed by speaker class") and
mission-phase-deployment.md found the link
that reaches it (message\UnitMessageSet_S<NN>.tbl gives every crew a
PresetMessage_Phase1/2/3). What neither says is what is inside the table —
which events exist, what governs when a line fires, and how a line reaches a
recording. That is this document.
Two files per set
A chatter set is a pair of IDXD objects in each dat/GP_MAIN_GAME_<lang>.pak:
| name | role |
|---|---|
message\PresetMessage_<who>.tbl |
the rule table — this document |
message\PresetMessage_<who>_msg.tbl |
the message table |
The _msg half is not new: it is exactly the record layout
cutscene-message-table.md settled for
MSG_DEMO_* — a Generic count record plus Message_NNN records with ID /
PageCount and 9 positional fields per page. What that document does not say is
that the same layout carries 137 more objects per language pack for
in-mission chatter, against the 32 cutscene ones it counted. The control run
confirms the split cleanly: of the 273 PresetMessage_* names that hit an IDXD
entry, 136 are rule tables and 137 are Generic+Message_NNN message
tables (3 of those are Generic-only, i.e. empty).
The rule table
144 per language pack, 864 across the six GP_MAIN_GAME_<lang>.pak — one
identical count in each, and ORDOR_SQUADRON_EXTENDED (the misspelling is the
game's, see below) is the largest single record name on the disc for exactly
that reason.
Every one of the 144 has the same 65 records: 64 event records plus a
Sperkers (sic) roster. One record-name tuple, no variants.
Event records
All 9 216 event records (144 × 64) share one named-field schema, with no exceptions:
EffectiveTime Interval Priority Probability MessageCount
IntervalFluctuation Pattern
After the seven named fields come the record's positional payload — [a record's unnamed positional fields are its payload] — in pairs:
(message id, Yes/No) e.g. ('MSG_BIRD_020', 'No')
MessageCount is the number of pairs, and that identity is exact:
MessageCount · 2 == positional-field count in 9 216 of 9 216 records, zero
mismatches. That is what pins the pairing. The second element of each pair is
No 8 940 times and Yes 388 times; its meaning is not settled.
The 64 events
The full census with per-event table counts is in the artefact. The shape of that census is itself informative:
- Player-facing events are voiced only by the wingman tables. Every
LOCKON_1..12,LOCKON_UP,LOCKON_DOWN,PLAYER_HP_LESS_10/30/50andPLAYER_AMMO_LESS_00/10/40record carries lines in exactly 13 of the 144 tables — the same 13 asORDER_WINGMAN_{FORMATION,ATTACK,COVER,EXTENDED}. - The squad/squadron order events carry lines in 7 tables each.
- Generic combat events are near-universal:
DAMAGED_BY_PLAYER_GREATER_50128,DAMAGED124,HP_LESS_10andHP_LESS_50121 each. - Five events are declared everywhere and populated nowhere —
DAMAGED_BY_PLAYER_50_30,HP_LESS_30,RETURNED,TALK,TM_TO_PLAYERhaveMessageCount 0in all 144 tables. They are slots the shipped data never uses.
Note the near-miss pairs that are not redundant: HP_LESS_* (the speaker's
own hull) versus PLAYER_HP_LESS_*, and AVOIDED_BY_PLAYER versus
AVOIDED_PLAYER_ATTACK. The _PLAYER half of each pair is the smaller
population.
Sperkers
The last record is a roster of speaker names as field names with empty
values — CharacterELLEN, CharacterADANCAMAEL, … 49 distinct speakers
across the 144 tables. Most tables name one speaker (84 of 144); the rest name
2–11, and three name none.
The join to audio is the settled cue table
The pair's first element is a message id, and it resolves through the cue index
sound-cue-table.md already documents — MSG_ becomes
VOICE_, then SOUNDS in dat/tables.pak gives the numeric id and FILES the
.slb bank.
2 388 of 2 405 distinct message ids resolve (99.3 %). The 17 that do not
are characterised, not swept up: 8 are ordinary four-letter-family ids
(MSG_ADAN_569/668/788/789, MSG_ADPL_045/046/047, MSG_RHIN_341) and 9 are
MSG_VOICE_*, seven of them the consecutive run MSG_VOICE_D_443…_449. A
consecutive run with no recording reads as content cut late. All 17 are listed
in the artefact.
⚠️ The wrinkle in that doc is real and I walked into it. Rewriting MSG_ to
VOICE_ unconditionally gives VOICE_VOICE_D_443, which resolved only 2 353 of
2 405 and would have been written up as "52 lines with no recording", with 44 of
them a naming artefact. sound-cue-table.md states the exception explicitly —
a name that already carries VOICE_ keeps the one it has — and applying it
moves the count to 2 388. Recorded here because the same trap is one line of
code away in any port.
Naming, by two independent routes that agree
The rule tables are pak entries keyed by name_hash, so they had to be named
before any of this could be read.
- Harvested strings — every
PresetMessage_*string appearing anywhere in any IDXD object on the disc, hashed under themessage\prefix: 136/144. - Declarations — the
PresetMessage_Phase1/2/3values of the 22message\UnitMessageSet_S<NN>.tbltables: 136/144.
The two routes name the same set (verified as a set identity, not a matching
count). Names are of the form
PresetMessage_<who>[_<NN>]_S<stage>-<phase>.tbl, e.g.
PresetMessage_Ellen_03_S03-3.tbl, PresetMessage_ADAN_Camael.tbl — so a set is
scoped to a character and a stage-phase, which is what makes 144 of them.
Residual, characterised
- 8 rule tables stay unnamed and — this is the point — they are unnamed by both routes: nothing on the disc declares them. Their hashes are in the artefact.
UnitMessageSet_S<NN>.tblexists for 22 of the 28 shipped stages. The six missing are exactly S18–S23, the tutorials, which is the same set that has noAIParams_SNN.tbl(challenge-mission-gate.md). So the 8 undeclared tables are plausibly tutorial chatter, but that is a reading — no tutorialUnitMessageSetexists to confirm it.- The 22 stage tables declare 137 distinct
PresetMessagesets against 136 rule tables resolved, so one declared set has no rule table under themessage\prefix.
✅ Correction to squadron-orders.md
That document renders the voice-line enum at 0x820AEEB0 as
ORDER_{WINGMAN,SQUAD,SQUADRON}_{FORMATION,ATTACK,COVER,EXTENDED}. The
executable's own strings are not uniform: the WINGMAN and SQUAD names are
ORDER_, and all four SQUADRON names are misspelled ORDOR_. The disc data
carries the identical misspelling, which is how the two sides were joined.
That document's 🔴 warning — that this enum is a UI/comms axis and is not the order-class enum — is confirmed and now explained: all twelve names are record names in this chatter rule table, i.e. they are the twelve events "a squadron order was issued", each with its own lines, priority and interval. They are triggers for barks, not order types.
🟡 Not settled
- What
EffectiveTime,Interval,IntervalFluctuation,Priority,ProbabilityandPatternmean numerically — they are read here as a schema, not measured against the running game. - The
Yes/Nosecond element of each pair. - Which of the 49 speakers is a wingman — the "13 tables" partition above is a count, not a verified roster.