Same capture, counts only. Title's first drawn element is frame 706; the sweep is first submitted at 746 and first ON SCREEN at 747, so +41 frames. For scale, the plate's declared t=236 is frame ~942 at 1 unit/present -- 195 frames after the sweep is already visible geometrically. Named rather than folded in: that comparison assumes the title's first drawn frame is its t=0 and that its clock runs at 1 unit/present. The 41 is a raw frame count and carries neither. What it settles: POSITION does not gate the sweep late. So if a human sees it start when the plate appears, the gate cannot be where the quad is -- it has to be how opaque it is. That puts the whole of F6 on unit 2, which is amber: does the parent's alpha multiply into the leaf? The parent ramps 0->255 across t=70..100, so if it multiplies the sweep is invisible until ~70 and dim to 100 (a real early gate); if it does not, the sweep is fully lit from +41 frames and the human's report has no mechanism yet. The disagreement has narrowed usefully: before this unit "starts when the plate appears" had two candidate mechanisms, position or alpha. Position is now excluded by measurement. Refutes my own unit 1 framing. I wrote that a quad can be "fully opaque and entirely off-screen" and offered the travel as the likely explanation. It is not -- the sweep is on screen at +41 frames, nowhere near the plate. The travel explanation is dead, and I record it because I proposed it and it steered the port's reading of their own renderer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jc4pciRArGHfxGGhEbwp5t
3.1 KiB
F6 unit 4 — the sweep is on screen 41 frames after the title starts, long before the plate
Status: ✅ measured ⟨capture⟩ ×1. 2026-09-02.
Question: how many frames after the title starts drawing does the sweep first appear on screen? Look at: the frame its leading edge crosses into the viewport, minus the frame the title's first element draws. Not covered: alpha gating (unit 2, 🟡); the title's own clock origin.
The measurement
Same capture as units 2 and 3. Counts only — no clock conversion.
title's first drawn element frame 706
sweep first SUBMITTED frame 746 (+40 frames)
sweep first ON SCREEN frame 747 (+41 frames) NDC x span [−2.380, −0.990]
The sweep's leading edge is inside the viewport 41 frames after the title begins drawing.
For scale: the plate reaches full alpha at declared t = 236. At the
1 unit/present the splash work established, that is frame ≈ 942 — 195 frames
after the sweep is already on screen.
⚠️ That last comparison carries two assumptions and I am naming them rather
than folding them in: that the title's first drawn frame is its t = 0, and
that its clock runs at 1 unit/present. The 41 is a raw frame count and carries
neither.
🔴 What this settles, and what it hands to unit 2
Position does not gate the sweep late. It is geometrically visible from very early in the title, not at the plate. So if a human sees it start when the plate appears, the gate cannot be where the quad is — it has to be how opaque it is.
That puts the whole of F6 on unit 2, which is 🟡: does the parent's alpha
multiply into the leaf? The parent ramps 0→255 across t = 70→100, so:
| if parent alpha multiplies in | the sweep is invisible until ≈ t 70 and dim to 100 — a real early gate |
|---|---|
| if it does not | the sweep is fully lit from the moment it enters at +41 frames — and the human's report has no mechanism yet |
Neither is established. Unit 2's evidence was 14 sub-floor samples of 1754 and was rightly downgraded.
📌 But note the shape of the disagreement has narrowed usefully. Before this unit, "starts when the plate appears" had two candidate mechanisms — position or alpha. Position is now excluded by measurement. One candidate left, and it is the one already under test.
Refutation attempt
Target: my own unit 1 framing, that the human might be watching the leaf travel on screen rather than an alpha gate.
Result: REFUTED. I wrote that a quad can be "fully opaque and entirely off-screen" and offered that as the likely explanation. It is not: the sweep is on screen at +41 frames, nowhere near the plate. The travel explanation is dead, and I am recording it because I proposed it two units ago and it steered the port's reading of their own renderer.
Reach
⟨capture⟩ ×1, one boot, pteff03 only. The +41 is a frame count between two
events in one stream and needs no clock. The comparison to the plate does need
one, and is labelled. pteff03a does not appear in this capture.