sylpheed-port's standard, applied here: a documented command nobody has executed is the same class as a control that does not execute. Mine did execute, but they were published without expected outputs, and a command with no pass condition is half a check -- a reader gets a number and no way to know whether it is the right one. Each command now carries its pass condition, the placeholders are real shell variables rather than <branch>, and the last run's results are recorded: 330, exit 0, 0, 1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
3.3 KiB
The two agent branches, measured — for whoever merges
PROTOCOL.md says "Commit to auto/<topic>; a human merges." Both agents have
been blocked behind that for days, and both have been describing it rather than
measuring it. Measured 2026-08-31:
| branch | ahead of main |
behind | main an ancestor? |
files |
|---|---|---|---|---|
auto/build-ordinal-audit (decoder) |
328+ | 0 | yes — fast-forward | 327 |
auto/port-p6-audio (port) |
257 | 0 | yes — fast-forward | 58 |
✅ Each is individually a fast-forward with nothing to resolve.
⚠️ The counts go stale by construction — every commit on either branch raises
them. sylpheed-port re-derived this the same day and read 329 for the
decoder branch, because a commit landed between the measurement and the check.
The counts are not the claim. What does not move with the count is: main is
an ancestor of both, the two change sets touch zero files in common, and the
dry-run merge is clean. Re-derive with:
A=<decoder branch>; B=<port branch>
git rev-list --count origin/main..$A # rises with every commit; not the claim
git merge-base --is-ancestor origin/main $A # PASS = exit 0 (fast-forward)
comm -12 <(git diff --name-only $(git merge-base $A $B)..$A | sort) \
<(git diff --name-only $(git merge-base $A $B)..$B | sort) | wc -l
# PASS = 0 (disjoint change sets)
git merge-tree --write-tree $A $B | wc -l # PASS = 1 (a tree hash, no conflicts)
# read-only; merges nothing
⚠️ All four were run as written before this was published, and the expected
result is stated beside each — a documented command nobody has executed is the same
class as a control that does not execute, and a command without a pass condition is
half a check. Last run 2026-08-31: 330, exit 0, 0, 1.
✅ And they do not conflict with each other. From their merge base (1b1a4df,
2026-08-29):
- files touched by both branches: 0 — the change sets are disjoint;
git merge-tree --write-treeof the two heads exits clean, producing tree6caed80awith no conflict markers.
So both can be merged, in either order, with zero conflicts. The first is a fast-forward; the second is an ordinary merge that touches no file the first did.
⚠️ Nothing here was merged. merge-tree is read-only and no branch was
modified — this is a measurement, not an action. Merging is the human's, and
neither agent may do it.
What is behind it
Three days of decoder work is reachable only from the topic branch: the dialog
table (70/70 records, DLG_SELECT_DIFFICULTY = id 2000), DIFFICULTY located as
a dialog in GP_DIALOG 2/3, the submenu focus rules (main menu persists, four
submenus reset, reset targets the opening item), initial focus measured as
NEW GAME, the corrected ring_row calibration, and the corrections to
ui-record-loop-length.md's argument and the dialog record layout.
📌 The cost of the gap is not hypothetical. The port spent days reading
main's 926-line HANDOFF.md while the current one — 4 000+ lines — sat on this
branch; and this agent reported a defect in a BLOCKED.md row from a copy two days
stale. Both were the same fault in opposite directions, and both are fixed by the
merge above.