Files
Sylpheed/docs/re/README.md
sim 2f838040ca docs: stop telling people to use the retired xenia-rs
Instructions and generated text that still sent readers to `xenia-rs`, which is
archived and deleted locally. Provenance and dated research records are left as
they are — "lifted from xenia-rs", or a finding stating what database it was
measured against, is still true, and rewriting it would falsify the record.

Changed, because each one tells someone what to do today or writes stale text:

  docs/re/README.md          the RE toolchain guide queried `xenia-rs/sylpheed.db`
                             with `xenia-rs/zq.py`, and its "Dynamic" bullet said
                             to prefer xenia-rs's probe suite OVER Canary. Now:
                             `sylpheed.db` at the repo root (how to build it and
                             re-stamp names), `tools/zq.py`, dynamic = Canary, and
                             `.rdata` reads from the `.pe` (offset = VA - 0x82000000)
                             in place of `--dump-addr`.
  challenge-mission-gate.md, structures/achievements.md
                             reproduction commands `python3 xenia-rs/zq.py dis …`
  crates/sylpheed-xexdb/SCHEMA.md
                             titled after the retired `xenia-analysis` crate,
                             citing `xenia-rs dis`, pointing at a `xenia-analysis`
                             source path
  sylpheed-xexdb/src/formatter.rs
                             WROTE "generated by xenia-rs" into every disassembly
                             it produced (no test pins the banner)
  sylph-xexdb.rs, db.rs      "SQLite" / "DuckDB writer for xenia-rs"
  sylpheed-formats/src/hash.rs
                             pointed at `xenia-rs/RE_SYMBOLS.md`, now at
                             `docs/re/RE_SYMBOLS.md`

Verified: every rewritten reproduction command was extracted from the doc and
run as written against the regenerated database — all 5 exit 0 and return the
disassembly they describe. The README's function count (25 676) is the database's
own. `cargo fmt --all -- --check` clean.

Not changed, deliberately: the README's Oracle bullet says Canary's native Linux
ELF "crashes / does not run". That is about Canary, not xenia-rs, and it conflicts
with a July note that the native build works — unverified either way here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 20:37:08 +02:00

6.0 KiB
Raw Blame History

Reverse-engineering knowledge base

This directory is the spec-side of the clean-room: it records what the original Project Sylpheed binary does (behaviour) and how its data is laid out, so that the Rust port can be implemented from these specs without re-deriving anything and without ever copying original code.

It exists to answer one question fast: "do we already know how X works, and how sure are we?"


The one rule that matters

Never document a claim more confidently than the evidence supports, and never paste original code here.

A wrong-but-confident note is worse than no note: someone builds on it and the bug hides for weeks. Every entry therefore carries an explicit confidence and its evidence. This mirrors the project method — measure the oracle, never infer; refute before believing.

Clean-room firewall

  • Allowed: behaviour descriptions, field offsets/types, formulas, state machines, observed input→output pairs, and references to the original by address (sub_821B68C0) or to sylpheed.db.
  • Forbidden here and in crates/: pasted decompiled C/C++ or verbatim disassembled function bodies presented as the thing to reimplement. Cite the address; describe the behaviour in your own words. Disassembly is a tool for understanding, not a source to copy.

Confidence levels

Level Meaning Bar to reach it
CONFIRMED Behaviour verified against ground truth. ≥2 independent observations or one observation cross-checked against an oracle (canary framebuffer, a known-correct value, a second code path).
PROBABLE Strong single-source inference. One clean observation, or an unambiguous static read of the disassembly.
HYPOTHESIS Educated guess, not yet tested. Anything else. Must say what would confirm/refute it.

The status markers

The table above is the confidence scale. The markers that appear in BACKLOG.md and the structures/ pages are a separate, and until now undefined, vocabulary. They mean:

Marker Meaning
Confirmed — verified against ground truth.
🟡 Partial: true as far as it goes, or true under a stated assumption.
Open question. Nobody has answered it yet.
🔴 Refuted — shown false — or blocked by something the container cannot do.
A specific claim that was tried and failed. Prefer 🔴.
🚧 Work started and not finished.

🔴 never means "we have not run it yet." That is or 🚧. Reserve 🔴's "blocked" sense for a real limit of the box — no push credentials, no hardware Vulkan (lavapipe only), or a decision only the user can make. The box can run the emulator, script input, screenshot, read guest memory, and build and test Rust, so "needs a run" is never a blocker. This paragraph exists because the marker was undefined for 98 uses and three of them were mislabelled that way.

Promotion requires new evidence, not re-reading the old evidence. A HYPOTHESIS that "looks right again" is still a HYPOTHESIS. Only an independent check promotes it. If evidence later contradicts an entry, demote it and record the contradiction — do not silently edit the conclusion.


When to document

  • Right after a function/structure crosses from HYPOTHESIS to at least PROBABLE — before moving to the next code path, so the knowledge isn't lost or re-derived.
  • Whenever confidence changes (up or down) — append to the Evidence log, don't overwrite.
  • Not while it's still a pure guess with no evidence — a one-liner in the relevant backlog/plan is enough until there's something to stand on.

What to document

  • Functions/code pathsdocs/re/functions/<name>.md (one file per function or tight cluster).
  • Data structures / formatsdocs/re/structures/<name>.md.
  • Keep the index in INDEX.md (one line each: name · confidence · one-line summary).

Use the templates: _TEMPLATE.function.md, _TEMPLATE.structure.md.


How we find and confirm code paths (the toolchain)

Everything joins on the guest virtual address (PC) — code addresses are fixed by the XEX load, identical across our emulator and canary.

  • Static (cheap, try first): sylpheed.db at the repository root (DuckDB: 25 676 functions, xrefs, strings, vtables, imports; git-ignored — build it with sylph-xexdb dis <ISO> --db sylpheed.db --analyze sql --quiet, then re-stamp names with tools/apply_re_symbols.sql). Query with tools/zq.pyzq.py grep <str>, zq.py xref <addr>, zq.py dis <lo> <hi>, zq.py fn <pc>. Entry points are usually a string (zq.py grep MSG_DEMO) or an import (movie/XMA API) xref'd back to the loader.
  • Dynamic (when static is ambiguous): Xenia Canary, below. The xenia-rs probe suite this bullet used to recommend (--pc-probe, --mem-watch, --lr-trace, --dump-addr) went with that emulator when it was retired on 2026-09-16. For static .rdata reads that --dump-addr served, read the .pe directly: it is a flat VA dump, file offset = VA 0x82000000.
  • Oracle (correctness ground truth): canary — the Wine cross-build xenia-canary/build-cross/bin/Windows/Debug/xenia_canary.exe (the native Linux ELF crashes / does not run — do not use it). This is the only emulator that reaches the in-game menu; our retired xenia-rs never got past the intro video. Use canary to observe output (capture its framebuffer for texture colours), not usually to instrument code — though its build-cross toolchain does compile, so small C++ probes + rebuild are possible when needed. Run muted, one emulator process at a time, point it at the real ISO (not the symlink).

⚠️ VA-equality caveat: join code by PC (fixed), but never assume a data VA holds the same bytes across emulators — allocators differ. Compare data by content/layout.