Files
Sylpheed/docs/agents
Fabian Hamm 885b4d4d67
Some checks failed
CI / Native — linux (pull_request) Successful in 29m58s
CI / WASM — Web (pull_request) Failing after 8m1s
CI / Formatting (pull_request) Failing after 36s
docs: the handoff's resume steps assume a machine this is not
§§1-9 were written on fabi-Hyrican-PC. On the other desktop the ~/.sylph-*
credentials do not exist, the Pi does not resolve, and stable is 1.90.0 rather
than the 1.98.1 §8 records -- so §8.2 (fetch the WASM bundle) and §8.4 (Phase 7)
cannot be run from here at all. Says which of the four steps can.

Measured rather than carried over: protection holds (10/10), fmt is 774 hunks
across 154 files, check-citations is 19, and the tests are 207/0/14 across 30
suites. Two of those need reading carefully:

  * clippy DIVERGES. The runner is rustc 1.98.1 -- read out of job 794's log,
    not assumed -- and is clean; here 1.90.0 exits 101 on only_used_in_recursion
    at vfs.rs:85. That is #15 ceasing to be theoretical. It is NOT evidence that
    CI's green is fake, which is the §7 lesson-5 inference in the other
    direction.
  * the test tally matches to the unit while measuring something else. 15
    *_disc.rs files resolve disc_root() through a hardcoded absolute path, so
    unsetting SYLPHEED_DISC does not skip them: the disc suites RAN here (1936 s,
    mesh_consistency_disc alone 1220 s) and skipped on CI (2.4 s total) -- and
    both report 207/0/14, because the skip path returns from a test that still
    passes. Good news for #14, since this run is the stronger evidence; and worth
    an issue, since SYLPHEED_DISC looks like a control and is not one.

I got that last one wrong first -- inferred "the counts cannot match" from "the
fallback resolves", which is §7's shape a sixth time, recorded as such.

Also: a plain `git clone` of this repo fails three ways on the pack that still
carries the 545 MB; --filter=blob:none works. And §6's tokio claim was
challenged and survived -- every use is inside a #[cfg(test)] module.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 22:20:30 +02:00
..