Disc-wide: 0 read from the T8aD header, 14 implied, 66 nothing. So the rule has
never been checked against a decoded field because no instance lets both speak.
The port's six are the same pattern: 0 read, 4 implied, 2 nothing.
Records their retraction, which runs against their own interest: 'none of the 18
is evidence' conflated two questions. The rule does not CHANGE the composite on
those 14, but it does get the RIGHT ANSWER there, and implied_layer_key is a
position measured in the running game -- so those are the rule agreeing with the
oracle, its only external corroboration. Four of the 14 are the port's splashes.
My own framing was right about provenance and wrong about weight: I filed an
oracle measurement under 'not the file', which reads weaker when it is stronger.
Closing the thread on my side -- four iterations, and it has stopped being about
the port.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF
7e7adf1ea4