Files
Sylpheed/docs/re/structures/achievements.md
sim 124b9a1561
All checks were successful
CI / Native — linux (pull_request) Successful in 2h4m59s
CI / WASM — Web (pull_request) Successful in 30m45s
CI / Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
docs: stop telling people to use the retired xenia-rs
Instructions and generated text that still sent readers to `xenia-rs`, which is
archived and deleted locally. Provenance and dated research records are left as
they are — "lifted from xenia-rs", or a finding stating what database it was
measured against, is still true, and rewriting it would falsify the record.

Changed, because each one tells someone what to do today or writes stale text:

  docs/re/README.md          the RE toolchain guide queried `xenia-rs/sylpheed.db`
                             with `xenia-rs/zq.py`, and its "Dynamic" bullet said
                             to prefer xenia-rs's probe suite OVER Canary. Now:
                             `sylpheed.db` at the repo root (how to build it and
                             re-stamp names), `tools/zq.py`, dynamic = Canary, and
                             `.rdata` reads from the `.pe` (offset = VA - 0x82000000)
                             in place of `--dump-addr`.
  challenge-mission-gate.md, structures/achievements.md
                             reproduction commands `python3 xenia-rs/zq.py dis …`
  crates/sylpheed-xexdb/SCHEMA.md
                             titled after the retired `xenia-analysis` crate,
                             citing `xenia-rs dis`, pointing at a `xenia-analysis`
                             source path
  sylpheed-xexdb/src/formatter.rs
                             WROTE "generated by xenia-rs" into every disassembly
                             it produced (no test pins the banner)
  sylph-xexdb.rs, db.rs      "SQLite" / "DuckDB writer for xenia-rs"
  sylpheed-formats/src/hash.rs
                             pointed at `xenia-rs/RE_SYMBOLS.md`, now at
                             `docs/re/RE_SYMBOLS.md`

Verified: every rewritten reproduction command was extracted from the doc and
run as written against the regenerated database — all 5 exit 0 and return the
disassembly they describe. The README's function count (25 676) is the database's
own. `cargo fmt --all -- --check` clean.

Not changed, deliberately: the README's Oracle bullet says Canary's native Linux
ELF "crashes / does not run". That is about Canary, not xenia-rs, and it conflicts
with a July note that the native build works — unverified either way here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 20:37:08 +02:00

8.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Achievements — the 24-entry table, and where the earned state comes from

Conf.: for the table and for the XAM read path; 🟡 for the requirement list's bit numbering. Spec: tools/xach_dump.py · examples/achievements_map.rs Evidence: captures/achievements-xach.txt

Retracted here, and it matters: earlier drafts of this file claimed the challenge missions gate on this achievement mask. They do not. That gate reads a cleared-stage bitmask whose sole writer is GamePart_StageClear — see challenge-mission-gate §5.2. The link was invented out of a numeric coincidence: ACHIEVEMENTS_REQUIREMENTS has 24 entries and the challenge gate splits its two words at 24, for entirely unrelated reasons (24 is also the first challenge stage's id). Everything below is what survived checking the writer.

The title reads its earned-achievement state from the console, and separately carries a disc table of what each achievement requires. Both are useful to the reimplementation on their own terms.

1. The table: 24 achievements, 1000G

The XEX embeds an SPA/XDBF resource. XACH sits at .pe offset 0x8FBCBC:

field type notes
magic char[4] XACH
version u32 1
size u32 874
count u16 24

then count records of 36 bytes:

off type field
0 u16 achievement id (1…24)
2 u16 name string id
4 u16 unlocked-description string id
6 u16 locked-description string id
8 u32 image id
12 u16 gamerscore
14 u16 pad (0)
16 u32 flags (0x0C throughout)
20 16 bytes of zeroes

Strings come from one XSTR section per language (7 present); each is magic[4] "XSTR", version u32, size u32, count u16, then entries of id u16, len u16, len bytes ASCII. English is table #5.

The stride and field offsets are self-checked: the 24 gamerscores sum to exactly 1000, the retail total. A wrong stride does not add up to a round 1000.

Ids run 1…24 with no gaps.

Correction 1 of 2 (same day). This file first said "bit n ↔ achievement id n+1", i.e. 0-based bits. That was wrong-headed: the only place the image is observed turning an achievement into a bit does 1 << dwId with dwId 1-based (§3.1), so the bit index is the id itself and bit 0 is unused. The 0-based reading came from assuming the config list's position was the bit, which §3 no longer supports.

2. The 24 achievements

Ids run 1…24 with no gaps. Where the image turns one into a bit it uses 1 << dwId (§3.1), so the id is the bit and bit 0 is unused — but note that this mask is not the challenge gate's (§4).

id G name
1 20 Space Combat Award
2 20 Schlos Base Defense Award
3 20 Aegis of the People Medal
4 20 TCAF Luna Medal
5 40 TCAF Mars Medal
6 50 Soldier's Charm Amulet
7 20 White Griffons Patch
8 30 TCAF Jupiter Medal
9 40 Furious Pursuit Badge
10 30 Solo Aerospace Combat Award
11 30 Operation Nebula Blaze Award
12 40 Guilty Roses Patch
13 30 Super Battleship Slayer Patch
14 40 TCAF Terra Medal
15 40 Hellfires Patch
16 50 Night Ravens Patch
17 40 Solar System Defense Award
18 40 Special Operations Medal
19 30 1,000 Units Destroyed Medal
20 70 10,000 Units Destroyed Medal
21 50 Ship Hunter Award
22 70 Gigaton Club Patch
23 80 Weapon Lord Patch
24 100 TCAF Pilot's Commendation

3. The game evaluates them itself, from a disc config (numbering 🟡)

GamePart_Debriefing (0x8218CF380x82191B18, bounded by the factory creator thunks either side) runs sub_8218F9A8 after a mission:

for i = 0, 1, 2, :
    node = child(ACHIEVEMENTS_REQUIREMENTS, i, &x)     ; bl 0x82448338
    bit  = 1 << x
    if (this+208 & bit) continue                      ; already awarded
    if (evaluate(this, node))                         ; bl 0x8218FAB0
        this+208 |= bit

The list is on disc — tables.pak entry #16, schema 744c0519, the GP_DEBRIEFING_PILOTLOG.pak+eng config — and its entries are literally ACHIEVEMENT01ACHIEVEMENT24, in order.

⚠️ x is not proven to be the loop index. 0x82448338 walks a 12-byte child array and writes the child entry's first word to the out-parameter; whether that word is the ordinal, an explicit id, or a name hash is not pinned. Since §3.1 shows the image elsewhere shifting by a 1-based achievement id, x is most likely the id too — but this file previously stated "the list index is the bit index" as fact, and that is withdrawn.

3.1 The earned state comes from XAM — the console profile, not the save

The same class enumerates a buffer of 36-byte records (0x8218F888):

  • the record count is a byte count divided by 36 — via the multiply-high magic 0x38E38E39 plus srawi 3, which is the standard unsigned /36 sequence, so the stride is confirmed by the arithmetic and not just by inspection;
  • field +0 is used as a shift amount (1 << id), field +32 is tested for bit 0x00020000;
  • the buffer is produced asynchronously: a handle at this+100 is waited on (0x824AA330(h, -1)) then closed (0x824AA3E0).

That is exactly the XDK's XACHIEVEMENT_DETAILS{ DWORD dwId; PWSTR pwszLabel, pwszDescription, pwszUnachieved; DWORD dwImageId, dwCred; FILETIME ftAchieved; DWORD dwFlags; } = 36 bytes, with XACHIEVEMENT_DETAILS_ACHIEVED == 0x00020000 — fetched through the XamUserCreateAchievementEnumerator / XEnumerate pattern.

So the title does not persist earned achievements itself: it asks the console. The masks it builds (this+208, +736, +740) are 1 << dwId, i.e. bit = the 1-based achievement id, bit 0 unused.

For anything that wants to unlock achievement-gated content, the lever is therefore the emulator's profile achievement data, not the 545-byte savegame.

The record also carries each requirement's type and parameters: StageClear(Stage), MissionObjective, Item, Rank (S), ShootDownAircrafts(Count 1000 / 10000), ShootDownShips(Count 100), ShootDownWeight(MegaTons), GetAllWeapons, GetAllAchievements.

That set independently confirms the list's ORDER (not the bit numbering): the last five types line up with ids 1924 exactly as the XACH table names them — 1 000 units, 10 000 units, 100 warships, one gigaton, all Delta Saber equipment, and finally the meta GetAllAchievements → id 24, TCAF Pilot's Commendation, the 100G one. So the config list is in achievement-id order; what it does not settle is whether the bit the code shifts by is that position or the id (see the ⚠️ above).

⚠️ GetAllAchievements and GetAllWeapons look like debug cheats and are not — they are requirement types in the achievement table. Worth stating because the strings sit next to genuinely debug-looking ones in the image.

4. What this is not: the challenge-mission gate (refuted)

GamePart_ChallengeMission gates each mission on a bit of a word at singleton +80. That word has exactly one writer in the image — 0x821C1820 in GamePart_StageClear — and it sets 1 << (this+84) where this+84 is the stage number (it also indexes a 20-byte per-stage record array and the debriefing config's STAGE sprite list). So that word is a cleared-stage mask, not this achievement mask, and the < 24 / >= 24 split is the disc's stage numbering (story 116 and tutorial 1823 below 24; challenge 2429 above), not a count of achievements.

Nothing observed copies the Debriefing's achievement masks (+208, +736, +740) into that word, which is the check that should have been done before the claim was made rather than after.

Reproduce

python3 tools/xach_dump.py "<disc>/…/Project Sylpheed ….pe"
cargo run --release -q -p sylpheed-formats --example achievements_map -- <disc-root>
python3 tools/zq.py dis 0x8218f9a8 0x8218fa60     # the requirement walk
python3 tools/zq.py dis 0x8218f888 0x8218f990     # the XACHIEVEMENT_DETAILS scan