I argued `highest_rate` had no case because ADV's higher-rate presentation is
dual-mono while its louder one is mono-in-stereo, so the extra bytes buy a
duplicated channel rather than fidelity. The Decoder tested that disc-wide over
the 28 three-stream cues: the stream-3/stream-2 size ratio runs min 0.0778,
median 1.2565, max 2.9163, sd 0.5057, with only 12 of 28 within 15% of 1.0, and
declared rates scatter with them. A 37x spread is not a duplicated channel.
The CHANNEL MEASUREMENT STANDS -- ADV chunk 1 is mono-in-stereo and chunk 2 is
dual-mono at -8.318574, this port's own decode, which the Decoder could not
re-run and did not dispute. What fails is the step from one asset to the format.
NOTHING IN THE EXPORT CHANGES. `loudest` is a per-asset content rule -- it reads
the peak of the streams in front of it -- so a scattering structural ratio cannot
undermine it. What changes is the REASON, in four places: authored/audio.json's
presentation_why, the selector comment in audio.rs, BLOCKED.md's row, and
DECISIONS.md. The honest statement is narrower: `highest_rate` was never refuted,
it was never argued for, and neither is `loudest`. That is why the entry is
marked CHOSEN rather than measured, and why one capture deletes it.
Recorded on the pattern rather than just the instance: this is the third claim of
mine in two iterations that generalised a single-asset observation, after "the
chunks are two stems" and "everything the sequencer paces off rest.t is late".
All three were true of the thing I looked at. The failure is reaching for the
rule a measurement would imply if it held everywhere and writing that down in the
same breath as the measurement.
Also noted, not mine and not affecting export_voice: S12B's three streams are
byte-size identical, and BIRD_224 is three-stream while not being a movie cue.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF
92f1436836