The port reported GP_TITLE entries 6/9 as a three-button submenu. This page and
HANDOFF call 6/9 EXTRAS and never recorded a button count, and 18 elements
looked like too many for three buttons, so I challenged it -- from the count,
without listing the elements.
Wrong. `screen info --all --build 6` shows ptbtn11/12/13 among fifteen frame,
title, background and effect layers, and entry 9 is identical. Both things are
true: 6/9 are EXTRAS (our composite correlates +0.944 whole-frame with the
committed live-extras.png) and EXTRAS is a three-button screen. The port
established the button count; the corpus did not have it.
Recorded per the adversarial duty, which is worth nothing if only the successful
challenges get written down. The retraction has gone to the port as well.
Also checked in the same pass, and it constrains Q2: entries 5 and 8 have
identical element lists and identical button placements, as do 6 and 9. The
EN/JP difference lives in the baked sprite pixels, so no layout field will ever
separate the members of either pair -- that needs the sprite images or a
capture, and the "English is the first half of the data segment" rule stays a
heuristic rather than something a field will replace.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QsEPXWVaEpyfudtR6re1Pd
b40f18eeb6