Sylpheed/authored/audio.json

{
 "format": "sylpheed.audio/1",
 "_": [
  "Menu audio. EVERY VALUE IN THIS FILE IS MEASURED OR CHOSEN -- none of it is",
  "in a data file the exporter can read, which is why it is here and not in the",
  "exporter. `measured` and `chosen` are NOT the same thing and this file keeps",
  "them apart: a measurement is deleted when the disc states it, a choice is",
  "deleted when somebody measures it.",
  "",
  "Two different kinds of not-on-the-disc live in this file and they are not",
  "interchangeable:",
  "",
  "  * `se` -- MEASURED. `Static.slb` is a delimiter-less run of whole 2048-byte",
  "    XMA1 packets: no RIFF, no seek chunk, no XACT container. A wave is defined",
  "    ONLY by (offset, packet_count), and both numbers come from the running",
  "    game, not from the file. HANDOFF Q8. Delete a row the day a table on the",
  "    disc states the same thing.",
  "",
  "  * `bgm` -- MEASURED, and only the LOOP POLICY beside it is chosen. HANDOFF",
  "    Q10's negative is about the TABLES: `SOUNDS`, `FILES` and the bank headers",
  "    name no screen. The executable does -- cue 1103 = `BGM_103`, corroborated",
  "    by a byte-for-byte match against what the XMA probe saw at the main menu.",
  "    An earlier draft read the negative as unbounded, picked a track at random",
  "    and called it authored. See the `bgm._` block for what that cost.",
  "",
  "The exporter reads this file and emits `export/audio/**` from it. It holds no",
  "cue table of its own: a measured offset compiled into a Rust `const` is a",
  "measurement wearing the costume of a decoded field, and MISSION section 3 is",
  "explicit that measured values live here."
 ],
 "se": {
  "_": [
   "MEASURED, HANDOFF Q8, and the RE agent retracted an earlier 'cannot be",
   "extracted' to publish these. The waves were located BY PLAYING THEM: Canary",
   "with `--xma_param_probe=true` prints a stream's packet count and first 32",
   "bytes when it is played, and searching those bytes in the bank gives the",
   "offset.",
   "",
   "WARNING, from the same finding: the file order is NOT cue-id order. These",
   "cannot be counted out, and an index here would be a fabrication.",
   "",
   "`name_match` is the authors' own identifier GUESSED BY NAME. It is carried",
   "so the guess is not lost and is never presented as the measurement. Where",
   "the RE agent did not separate two candidates, there is no name at all --",
   "an absent `name_match` means nobody has claimed one, never that the",
   "BINDING is unknown. The binding is the measured part.",
   "",
   "All three are mono 48 kHz; that is the RE agent's statement in",
   "`sylpheed_formats::media::se_wave_riff`, not something re-derived here."
  ],
  "move": {
   "bank": "Static.slb",
   "offset": "0x1ec0",
   "packets": 4,
   "channels": 1,
   "rate": 48000,
   "name_match": "SE_UI_CURSOR",
   "why": "HANDOFF Q8, measured: the d-pad move cue, 8 192 B / 0.533 s, reproduced across two boots. Left/right play nothing at all, which is a measurement too and is why there is no `left`/`right` row here rather than a silent file.",
   "kind": "measured"
  },
  "confirm": {
   "bank": "Static.slb",
   "offset": "0x5d6c0",
   "packets": 6,
   "channels": 1,
   "rate": 48000,
   "why": "HANDOFF Q8, measured: the (A) confirm cue, 12 288 B / 1.016 s. NO `name_match`: Q8 is explicit that (A)'s wave was not separated between `SE_UI_DECIDE` and `SE_UI_SUB_WIN_OPN`, so naming it would invent the one thing the measurement did not settle.",
   "kind": "measured"
  },
  "back": {
   "bank": "Static.slb",
   "offset": "0x0ec0",
   "packets": 2,
   "channels": 1,
   "rate": 48000,
   "why": "HANDOFF Q8, measured: the (B) back cue, 4 096 B / 0.344 s, reproduced across two boots. No `name_match` for the same reason as `confirm` -- Q8 names no identifier for it.",
   "kind": "measured"
  }
 },
 "bgm": {
  "_": [
   "MEASURED, NOT CHOSEN -- and the port got this wrong for one iteration.",
   "",
   "`docs/port/BLOCKED.md` carried a row reading 'not on the disc ... the port",
   "is choosing a track, and that choice is authored', and the first draft of",
   "this file duly picked BGM_001 and labelled it arbitrary. That row was not",
   "stale: `BGM_103` is in HANDOFF at `9ca1eb5`, which is the exact commit the",
   "row says it was reconciled against. It was WRONG WHEN WRITTEN.",
   "",
   "What HANDOFF actually says is a negative with a stated reach, and the reach",
   "is what the port dropped: the *tables* cannot say which BGM a screen plays",
   "-- `SOUNDS`, `FILES` and the bank headers name no screen. The EXECUTABLE",
   "can. `GamePart_Title`'s phase handler `sub_821C5580` carries `li r5, 1103`",
   "into a sound call, cue 1103 is `BGM_103`, and `BGM_103.slb`'s two declared",
   "waves (3 876 864 / 3 930 112 B) are byte-for-byte the two streams the XMA",
   "probe saw decoding at the main menu. Static code, disc census and runtime",
   "agree. HANDOFF's own words: 'The port does not have to choose a track.'",
   "",
   "So this section is a CITATION, not a decision. It lives in `authored/`",
   "only because the binding is in the .xex and the exporter reads data files,",
   "not code -- and it must be deleted the day something the exporter can read",
   "states it. The loop policy below IS still a decision."
  ],
  "main_menu": {
   "bank": "BGM_103.slb",
   "loop": "restart",
   "kind": "measured",
   "why": "MEASURED, HANDOFF Q10 -- NOT a port choice. `GamePart_Title`'s phase handler `sub_821C5580` plays cue 1103 = `BGM_103`, and `BGM_103.slb`'s two declared waves (3 876 864 / 3 930 112 B) are byte-for-byte the two streams the XMA probe saw decoding at the main menu. Static code, disc census and runtime all agree; see docs/re/menu-audio-cues.md and docs/re/structures/bgm-two-stems.md. The name carries its `.slb` extension because that is what `sound.pak` hashes -- `BGM_103` alone resolves to nothing, which is how the first draft of this file failed. ✅ AUDITED 2026-08-31 -- the THREE legs are three, and that is now measured rather than asserted. Prompted by the Decoder's point that a decorative second support is worse than none, since a conclusion with two supports reads as better evidenced than one and apparent redundancy is itself the misinformation. Read literally, 'disc census' and 'runtime' could be ONE comparison -- declared wave sizes matched byte-for-byte against the probe -- which would make three legs two. It is a real third leg only if the census EXCLUDES alternatives: if another bank carried the same two sizes, the byte match would not distinguish BGM_103. Measured with this port's own reader (`crates/sylpheed-export/examples/bgm_size_census.rs`): of 32 readable BGM_* banks on the disc, EXACTLY ONE carries waves of that size. The census therefore excludes, the static-code leg names the cue independently, and the three legs stand. ✅ AND THE EXCLUSION IS TIGHTER THAN I STATED. The Decoder attempted to refute it from their own census tool rather than this port's reader: of 32 census rows, exactly one bank carries EITHER of those wave sizes -- not merely both together, which is what I measured. A collision would therefore need to reproduce a single size, not a pair, and none does.",
   "loop_why": "MEASURED, and this field's own history is why it says so first. The bed loops; the loop is a RUNTIME field -- `loop_start`/`loop_end` in the XMA decoder context, set by `XMASetLoopData` and logged by Xenia -- and the cycle was watched directly: three wraps, both contexts wrapping at the same instant every time, mean 61.81 s against the 61.93 s authored in `loop_end_s`, 0.2 % apart from instruments sharing nothing. The export is TRIMMED to that window, because Godot loops a whole file and a loop region therefore has to BE the file. ⚠️ The window's START is not measured and is authored as 0, which is known to be wrong -- see `loop_start_why`. 🔴 EVERY SENTENCE THAT PRECEDED THIS ONE WAS REFUTED, and the previous text survived in the manifest for two days after the corrections were written. It said the loop would be `AUDIBLY WRONG AT THE SEAM [refuted]`, that `no loop-point field has been identified [refuted] anywhere`, and that trimming `would INVENT a loop point`. All three are false: the field exists, the 3.4 s of near-silence was the PORT'S loop and not the game's, and the trim is now what the measurement says. The corrections went into `loop_end_why` and `loop_start_why`; this field is the one the exporter concatenates into `manifest.json`, so the export went on telling readers the refuted story. A correction that does not reach the artifact a consumer reads has not been made. 📌 CITATIONS ADDED 2026-09-01, and their absence was found by `audit-kinds` the moment this field got a `kind` -- it had 1 400 characters of prose and nothing openable, which is exactly the state the audit exists to catch and could not see while the field was unlabelled. The wrap measurement is docs/re/data/menu-bgm-loop-measured.txt and the start is docs/re/data/menu-bgm-loop-start.txt; the bank's two-stem structure is docs/re/structures/bgm-two-stems.md.",
   "loop_kind": "measured",
   "stems": "sum",
   "stems_why": "MEASURED, HANDOFF Q10: a bank is exactly TWO waves of identical duration (32/32 banks on the disc), sample-synchronous -- transient correlation peaks at lag 0.00 s over +/-5 s and both stop at the same millisecond. Concatenating them plays the piece twice, the second time as a bass-less stem; that was the previous reading and it is refuted. Emitting two files would be wrong for a second reason: MODDING rule 1 is one logical asset, one file, and handing a modder two stems to line up by hand is the reassembly the exporter exists to have already done. WHAT IS SUMMED IS SETTLED; WHAT WAVE 1 IS, IS NOT -- HANDOFF calls it quieter, far more L/R-decorrelated and almost bass-free, so it reads as a surround-rear pair OR a second intensity layer, and `ChannelMask` is 0x0002 on both so the file will not say. A unity sum is right under either reading; a weighting would only be justified once that is settled.",
   "stems_kind": "measured",
   "loop_start_s": 9.44,
   "loop_start_why": [
    "MEASURED 2026-08-30 -- 9.44 s. The loop region is [9.44 s, 71.31 s] of an",
    "87.744 s wave: the first 9.44 s is an intro played ONCE, and the last 16.4 s",
    "is a fade-out never played at all.",
    "",
    "Two derivations, both stems, and NEITHER converts bits to seconds -- the",
    "conversion that refuted itself earlier by giving two sample-synchronous stems",
    "62.34 and 63.29 s. (a) time to `read_offset` crossing `loop_start`, plus a",
    "1.33 s head correction at a LOCALLY measured rate; (b) first pass minus cycle.",
    "9.44 s on both stems either way.",
    "",
    "⚠️ ONE BOOT, ONE BANK. The decoder reads ahead of playback, but both endpoints",
    "are `read_offset` events so the lead cancels in the difference.",
    "",
    "🔴 THIS FIELD WAS 0.0 AND FLAGGED WRONG FOR ONE ITERATION, deliberately. The",
    "value was not guessable -- linear back-extrapolation said 9-13 s and linearity",
    "is refuted by a 4.4 % rate variation within one stream. What made the wait",
    "cheap was that the field EXISTED and the `-ss`/`-t` ordering had been proved",
    "with a stand-in value, so arriving at 9.44 was a one-value edit.",
    "",
    "📌 CITATION ADDED 2026-09-01 -- found the moment this field got a `kind`. It",
    "carried 1 041 characters describing two derivations and cited no file. The",
    "numbers are in docs/re/data/menu-bgm-loop-start.txt, and the loop region's",
    "wrap timing is in docs/re/data/menu-bgm-loop-measured.txt.",
    "",
    "⚠️ Second uncited MEASURED field in this one entry, after `loop_why`. Both",
    "described their evidence carefully in prose and pointed at nothing. A why that",
    "recounts a measurement reads as well-sourced precisely because it is detailed,",
    "which is why neither looked wrong.",
    "",
    "✅ AUDITED 2026-09-01 with the exclusion test: could either derivation have come",
    "out differently given the other? YES, and they discriminate different errors --",
    "(a) depends on a locally measured RATE and (b) on the CYCLE, so a wrong rate",
    "breaks (a) and leaves (b) standing, and a wrong cycle does the reverse. Two legs",
    "that fail independently, which is what 'two derivations' was claiming.",
    "",
    "⚠️ BOUND: they share one trace. A systematic error in the read_offset stream",
    "moves both, and the ONE BOOT, ONE BANK caveat above is that limit stated. What",
    "they exclude is arithmetic error, not trace error."
   ],
   "loop_start_kind": "measured",
   "loop_end_s": 61.87,
   "loop_end_why": [
    "MEASURED off the running game 2026-08-30, 240 s parked on the menu",
    "(docs/re/structures/menu-bgm-loop-measured.md). The bed loops at 61.93 s, NOT",
    "at the summed wave's 87.744 s length, and the last ~25.8 s is never played --",
    "exactly the fade-out and trailing silence bgm-two-stems.md found. The game",
    "loops BEFORE the fade.",
    "",
    "🔴 THIS CORRECTS AN AUTHORED VALUE THAT WAS WRONG IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. `restart`",
    "at the wave's end produced a seam of about 3.4 SECONDS of near-silence, and",
    "this port measured that seam off its own Master bus and recorded it as the",
    "cost of a missing loop point. It was not the game's seam; it was OURS. Zero",
    "runs of >=0.3 s below median-18 dB appear in 232 s of the real menu.",
    "",
    "Two instruments agree: correlation gives a top lag of 61.909 s and r = -0.009",
    "at 87.750 s, and locating 30 s slices inside the decoded waves shows playback",
    "advancing exactly +5.00 s per 5 s and wrapping at 61.93 s, three times, with a",
    "control that finds slices cut at 10/45/70 s at 10.00/45.00/70.00.",
    "",
    "⚠️ The loop START is inferred, not measured: [0.0, 61.93) and [0.25, 62.18) are",
    "not separated at their resolution. The port takes 0 because a bank's own start",
    "is where its data begins, and records that the choice was not measured.",
    "",
    "⚠️ Godot loops a WHOLE FILE, so the export is TRIMMED to 61.93 s rather than",
    "carrying a loop point the runtime could not honour. The trimmed tail is",
    "content the game never reaches, so nothing playable is lost -- but a modder",
    "replacing this file is replacing the loop region, not the whole bank.",
    "",
    "🔴 CONFLICT, OPEN AS OF 2026-08-30. The loop IS a runtime field: `loop_start`",
    "and `loop_end` live in the XMA decoder context, set by `XMASetLoopData`, and",
    "the RE agent read 8734 records off the menu. Converted, they imply a cycle of",
    "roughly [10 s, 72 s] against the [0.25, 57.18] their audio tracking reported.",
    "BOTH CANNOT BE RIGHT and neither has been withdrawn.",
    "",
    "They judge the weak link probably theirs: the locator's control matched slices",
    "cut from the wave ITSELF -- exact copies -- which is an easier problem than",
    "matching a capture that differs by decoder, gain and mix. A control easier than",
    "the measurement does not bound the measurement's error, and music with repeated",
    "sections is where a locator aliases.",
    "",
    "⚠️ THE VALUE IS KEPT ON THEIR INSTRUCTION, and because the LENGTH survives",
    "better than the PLACEMENT: 61.93 has an autocorrelation behind it that used no",
    "wave at all, and the trimmed loop has no seam in this port's own output.",
    "",
    "This port added one check neither of their instruments ran: whether the trim",
    "JOINS SMOOTHLY. Over 126.5 s the wrap at 61.93 s and again at 123.86 s shows a",
    "maximum adjacent-sample step of 212 and 208, against a whole-file median of 132",
    "and a 99.9th percentile of 3737. So the join is not a click and nothing is",
    "audibly broken.",
    "",
    "⚠️ THAT DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE THE TWO READINGS. A smooth join says the waveform",
    "does not jump; it does not say the loop is at the musically right point, and a",
    "cut landing near a zero crossing is smooth wherever it falls.",
    "",
    "🔴 What the conflict would COST if their runtime fields win: under [10 s, 72 s]",
    "this export is about 10 SECONDS SHORT -- the content in [61.93, 72] is played",
    "by the game and absent here. That is the number to weigh when it resolves, and",
    "it is why this entry is not being treated as settled.",
    "",
    "✅ CONFIRMED 2026-08-30 BY A SECOND INSTRUMENT SHARING NOTHING WITH THE FIRST.",
    "The RE agent stopped converting the runtime fields and TIMED them instead --",
    "a probe tailing the Apu debug log and stamping `read_offset` on arrival --",
    "and watched THREE wraps, each from its own `loop_end` to its own `loop_start`,",
    "with both contexts wrapping at the SAME INSTANT every time. Cycle 61.56 and",
    "62.06 s, mean 61.81 s: 0.2 % from the 61.93 authored here, measured by wall",
    "clock between decoder events against an autocorrelation that never touched",
    "the wave. Both contexts wrapping together is the sample-synchrony the linear",
    "bit conversion could not produce.",
    "",
    "So the LENGTH is settled and the WINDOW is not. See `loop_start_why`.",
    "",
    "✅ 61.87 ADOPTED 2026-08-30, replacing 61.93. Their wrap timing gives 61.87 --",
    "wraps at 96.46 / 158.33 / 220.21 s, gaps 61.87 and 61.87 -- against the 61.93",
    "this port's autocorrelation gave. 0.1 % apart. The measured value is taken",
    "because it is the one with the loop's own endpoints under it; the",
    "autocorrelation never touched the wave and agreed to a tenth of a percent,",
    "which is what makes both worth having."
   ],
   "loop_end_kind": "measured"
  }
 },
 "voice": {
  "_": [
   "🔴 KNOWN WRONG, HELD DELIBERATELY. Which of a voice region's streams to",
   "export. The premise this entry was built on has been REFUTED BY THE RUNNING",
   "GAME and the entry is kept, escalated, rather than swapped for another guess.",
   "",
   "The premise was: a region carries THREE PRESENTATIONS OF ONE TAKE, so the",
   "exporter picks one. The Decoder booted with `--xma_param_probe=true` -- the",
   "cvar that reports which sub-wave the game decodes -- and the game decodes",
   "ALL THREE, CONCURRENTLY, in three separate XMA contexts, with byte sizes",
   "matching the three disc payloads exactly (1294336 / 1118208 / 1171456",
   "against RIFF size - 60 of 1294396 / 1118268 / 1171516).",
   "",
   "SO THERE IS NO 'WHICH ONE' TO ANSWER. `presentation` below discards two of",
   "three streams the game plays. It is not a preference between rules any more;",
   "it is a known-incomplete export.",
   "",
   "WHY IT IS NOT CHANGED TODAY. Reverting to the 1/n sum is not obviously less",
   "wrong: an equal-gain sum of channel pairs is not a downmix -- MISSION",
   "section 6 makes exactly that point when it pins an explicit matrix for the",
   "movies' 5.1 fold rather than letting ffmpeg default -- and the 6.02 dB the",
   "sum cost S00A was a real defect. Swapping one guess for another on a message",
   "is what produced this entry twice already.",
   "",
   "🟡 HYPOTHESIS, NOT A RESULT, and it is the Decoder's: three concurrent stereo",
   "streams is six channels, and N stereo streams is how XMA carries",
   "multichannel on the 360, so 5.1 would explain the differing byte rates, the",
   "near-silent stream and why cues are 1-stream or 3-stream and never 2. AGAINST",
   "IT: all three declare ChannelMask = 0x0002 identically, which is odd for",
   "distinct channel roles. Do not build on it.",
   "",
   "WHAT SETTLES IT: a recording of the game's own output over the intro,",
   "through the PulseAudio null sink (AUDIO-VERIFICATION section 3). Candidate",
   "combinations of the three decoded streams can then be correlated against",
   "what the game actually played. Asked 2026-08-29.",
   "",
   "🔴 REFUTED FROM THE OUTPUT SIDE, 2026-08-30, not merely suspected.",
   "",
   "The RE agent recorded 148 s of the game's own output over the boot intro",
   "(ALSA tee, --gpu=null, 0.15 % silence -- cleaner than the recipe page's own",
   "reference run), with provenance from the XMA probe rather than a screenshot:",
   "`ADV`'s three contexts appear byte-exact, then the `BGM_102` pair.",
   "",
   "FIVE OF SIX CHANNELS CARRY DISTINCT CONTENT. No channel is a copy of another;",
   "the largest pairwise correlation is 0.70, between FL and FR, which is what a",
   "stereo pair looks like. BR is 82 % silent and 11 dB down.",
   "",
   "So `presentation: \"loudest\"` -- keeping ONE stream -- cannot be right. That",
   "was already labelled known-wrong here on the strength of the game decoding",
   "all three concurrently; it is now refuted by what the game PLAYS.",
   "",
   "⚠️ AND IT IS STILL NOT FIXED, DELIBERATELY, on the RE agent's own instruction.",
   "Three limits they state:",
   "  * it does not make summing right -- the output is multichannel, which says",
   "    nothing about which stream lands where;",
   "  * '6 channels' is NOT evidence the game is 5.1 -- that count is Xenia's",
   "    hardcoded kFrameChannelsDefault. The evidence is that five of them DIFFER,",
   "    which a stereo guest cannot produce;",
   "  * 🔴 the stream-to-channel mapping is NOT RUN. Cross-correlating each",
   "    captured channel against each decoded `ADV` stream is the step that",
   "    answers this, and it is their next iteration.",
   "",
   "Changing the mapping now would swap one authored guess for another, which is",
   "a worse position than a guess that is labelled. The value stays; the label is",
   "upgraded from suspicion to refutation."
  ],
  "presentation": "all",
  "presentation_why": [
   "`loudest` = the full-length stream whose peak is nearest full scale.",
   "",
   "🔴 READ THE BLOCK ABOVE FIRST. This selects one of three streams the game",
   "decodes concurrently, so whatever it selects, two are missing. The",
   "paragraphs below are the history of how the value was arrived at, kept",
   "because the reasoning is what makes the error checkable -- NOT because the",
   "choice is defensible on its own terms any more.",
   "",
   "It was `highest_rate`, on a recommendation withdrawn as self-contradictory:",
   "'the highest-rate, highest-gain one is chunk 1' selects different streams --",
   "ADV stream 2 is 1118268 B at 0.0 dBFS, stream 3 is 1171516 B at -8.3.",
   "",
   "A structural argument for `loudest` was offered and withdrawn too: ADV",
   "stream 2 is mono-in-stereo and stream 3 is dual-mono, so the extra bytes",
   "looked like a duplicated channel rather than fidelity. The CHANNEL",
   "MEASUREMENT stands and now reads differently -- these are channel pairs, and",
   "0.60x with the residual 26.8 dB down is what a correlated pair at a lower",
   "level looks like. The GENERALISATION was refuted by census: the stream-3 /",
   "stream-2 size ratio over the 28 three-stream cues runs 0.0778 to 2.9163.",
   "",
   "⚠️ THE FAILURE MODE HERE IS THAT IT SOUNDS FINE. A single stream decodes to",
   "clean audible dialogue, so nothing in the output reveals that two streams",
   "are missing. That is why the manifest says it in words on every voice entry",
   "rather than leaving it to this file.",
   "",
   "📌 WHERE THE OPEN QUESTION LIVES, added 2026-09-01 under this port's own rule:",
   "an `authored` kind must cite the question it stands in for, or an invented",
   "value and a placeholder for a measurement read identically. This one stands in",
   "for the three-concurrent-streams problem, recorded in docs/port/BLOCKED.md and",
   "delivered in docs/port/HANDOFF.md -- the game decodes all three at once, so",
   "ANY single selection is missing two, and the export states that per movie",
   "rather than choosing quietly.",
   "",
   "⚠️ 1 402 characters of careful reasoning and nothing openable until now. It is",
   "the third uncited field in this file, and all three were detailed rather than",
   "sloppy -- the detail is what made them look sourced."
  ],
  "presentation_kind": "authored",
  "stream_weights": {
   "_": [
    "Declared XMA `byte_size` -> the coefficient that stream's position takes in a",
    "stereo downmix. MEASURED by the RE agent 2026-08-30",
    "(docs/re/structures/intro-audio-decomposed.md): decomposing the game's own",
    "6-channel output as capture = 0.600 x movie + residual puts ctx0 at FL/FR,",
    "ctx1 at FC with LFE silent, and ctx2 at BL/BR.",
    "",
    "🔴 KEYED BY BYTE SIZE ON PURPOSE. The assignment is indexed by the decoder's",
    "own declared size, so the exporter can CHECK that the stream in front of it is",
    "the one the measurement describes rather than assume it. A region whose chunks",
    "do not match falls back to the count divisor and says so. That is not defensive",
    "programming: on 2026-08-30 this table's sizes did NOT fit the region the",
    "resolver returned, which is what exposed `resolve_movie_voice_region` starting",
    "238 packets late. Had the weights been applied positionally they would have",
    "been applied to the wrong streams silently.",
    "",
    "⚠️ ONE BOOT, ONE MOVIE. Only `ADV`'s three streams were measured. `S00A`'s",
    "sizes match nothing here and it keeps the divisor -- extending this by",
    "POSITION would be assuming the ordering generalises, which is exactly the",
    "inference the byte-size key exists to avoid.",
    "",
    "⚠️ The weights are a stereo downmix's, folded to mono. They sum to 1.0, so the",
    "total is the movie's own; what they distribute is the balance between three",
    "positions. Whether the game's 0.600 mixer gain is a constant or a volume",
    "setting is unknown and the port applies no gain of its own."
   ],
   "1294336": {
    "position": "FL/FR",
    "weight": 0.4142
   },
   "1118208": {
    "position": "FC (LFE silent)",
    "weight": 0.2929
   },
   "1171456": {
    "position": "BL/BR",
    "weight": 0.2929
   }
  }
 }
}