Correction first: the previous commit claimed the corpus 'did not know
the stage NUMBERS'. It did -- structures/mission-script-ssb.md has
recorded S01-S16, S18-S29, S17 absent by a three-way convergence (hash
lookup, the table sweep, the loader's != 16 guard) since before that
pass. What was actually new there is the player craft per stage and
ResourceID's ordinal tags; the numbering is a fourth independent route,
not a discovery.
The question this item asked: do the ISL StageNN.ssb files and the
UnitGroup_SNN.tbl tables use the same numbering, or is something
silently mis-labelled? They are identical. Stage\StageNN.ssb,
stage\UnitGroup_SNN.tbl and stage\Route_SNN.tbl all resolve for the
same 28 N with an EMPTY symmetric difference; AIParams is the same minus
18-23. Nothing in the corpus is mis-keyed. Formation_SNN and
Message_SNN resolve 0/40 -- those are field names, not files, and the
four families above are the controls that make that negative real.
New: Stage\script.tbl's SCRIPTS record lists 29 MISSION*.ssb fields --
MISSION1..MISSION29, including MISSION17 = Stage17.ssb -- and only 28 of
29 name a file that ships. Control: MISSIONn -> Stage<n>.ssb with the
same n, 0/29 mismatched. So S17 is a cut mission the shipping manifest
still names, which is why the loader carries an explicit != 16 guard
rather than just running 0..27.
Artefact +14 lines / 0 deletions; the other four regenerate
byte-identical.
ccdc226022