I offered 'a declared opaque-black backdrop distinguishes standalone from
composited' and asked for it to be tested against archives I do not have. It was.
The split reproduces exactly: derived independently from the disc, GP_TITLE gives
12 with and 4 without, the four being entries 0-3 -- my build_00, build_01,
press_start, press_start_jp -- with element names matching. Two genuinely
different paths, my export against their disc reader.
The reading does not survive. Disc-wide the predicate is rare, 76 of 965 builds at
7.9%, with GP_HANGAR_ARSENAL 0 of 390, GP_OPTIONS 0/14, GP_PAUSE_MENU 0/6. Read as
'composited' it makes 92% of the game composited, which the archives do not
support.
What survives is narrower: it separates screens that BEGIN FROM BLACK from
everything else, and their sharpening is the part I would not have reached -- the
negative class is heterogeneous, so a two-way rule cannot express it.
My caveat named the exact test that refuted the reading, but I still put the
refuted interpretation into verify-screen's header as a stated fact while the
hedge lived in DECISIONS.md. Corrected, with the 7.9% figure and an explicit do
not carry this into the four unexported archives. Hedging in the write-up does not
protect the claim shipped in the tool -- the same delivery gap as the
capture-phase term, repeated four iterations after fixing it once.
Within GP_TITLE the rule is exact and --black for those twelve is justified from
the file rather than assumed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF
d8488640a8