They retracted RMSE 0.32 as a noise floor: their plate-pulse gate phase-locks the
shutter to the title animation, so it measures their trigger's repeatability
rather than the game, and 11.9 is the replacement title-capture figure.
Checked my tree. Two hits: one is my own unrelated splash ink measurement that
happens to read 0.32, the other is a genuine citation. My entry used their 0.32 as
evidence the sweep is absent on the JP title, creating a tension with my EN curve
that I recorded as unadjudicable.
Both halves are now gone. Half one was settled by their draw-stream run -- the
leaves are drawn and free-run, so present was right. Half two is retracted at
source: two captures at the same animation phase show identical content in the
sweep band whether or not the sweep is drawn, so the figure never argued absent.
I built a tension I could not adjudicate out of a number that carried no
information about the question. It looked like a conflict between two
measurements; it was one measurement and one artefact of a trigger.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF
d87ad98513