885cc1f898
sylpheed-port ran my two-half decomposition on their side and found the thing that passes every check by being absent -- an authored value with no `why` at all. Their first pass flagged 35 of 131; ancestor-aware, the real number was 0. The analogue here is a page citing NO reference data, which my previous gate audit would score "0 missing" and pass. 42 pages carry a measured/decoded/CONFIRMED status; 3 cite no data/ or captures/ path. INSPECTED BEFORE PUBLISHING, per their rule, and all three are false positives, each verified rather than waved through: slb-bank-header-not-a-wave.md cites tests/slb_leading_segment_disc.rs, and that file exists in crates/sylpheed-formats/tests/ -- its evidence is a disc-wide check over 9 519 sound.pak entries plus regression tests. ui-screen-runtime.md carries 26 rows of inline evidence, live guest-memory reads matched field by field against the file. five-screens-acceptance.md is a consolidation page; its evidence is the six pages it links and the numbers it tabulates. 3 -> 0. The real finding is about the EARLIER audit. This corpus carries evidence in at least three forms -- committed data files, inline tables, committed disc tests -- and both checks look for exactly one. "48 citations, 0 missing" is a statement about the data-file form, not about whether the gates are evidenced. The gates are evidenced; the audit was narrower than its wording suggested. METHOD gains their formulation with all four instances -- a first count from a new detector is a measurement of the detector, and all four were caught by inspecting the flagged items before publishing the number -- and the corollary that an audit is narrower than its wording: name the form you checked, not the property you hope it stands for. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
83 lines
4.4 KiB
Plaintext
83 lines
4.4 KiB
Plaintext
# Are MISSION's gates MET and RECORDED, both halves? 2026-08-30.
|
|
#
|
|
# sylpheed-port found P0 complete-but-unindexed -- the work existed, the artifact
|
|
# existed, the gate record did not -- and named it as the argued-versus-indexed
|
|
# split one level up from the refutation register. This is the same audit on the
|
|
# Decoder's objective.
|
|
#
|
|
# MISSION's gate: "a written docs/re/ result with the evidence, and REFERENCE DATA
|
|
# COMMITTED ALONGSIDE IT". Two halves, and all ten questions read ✅ answered.
|
|
#
|
|
# HALF ONE -- every Q cites a docs/re/ result. All ten do:
|
|
# Q1 ui-keyframe-time-unit.md + ui-keyframe-record-layout.md
|
|
# Q2 ui-title-build-map.md
|
|
# Q3 structures/ui-paint-order-key.md + ui-paint-order-derived-check.md
|
|
# Q4 menu-navigation-semantics.md Q5 menu-navigation-semantics.md
|
|
# Q6 boot-config-and-gamepart-registry.md Q7 screen-transitions.md
|
|
# Q8 menu-audio-cues.md Q9 movie-binding.md
|
|
# Q10 structures/bgm-two-stems.md + slb-bank-header-not-a-wave.md
|
|
#
|
|
# HALF TWO -- reference data committed alongside. Every data/ and captures/ path
|
|
# cited by those pages was resolved against the tree:
|
|
#
|
|
# ui-keyframe-time-unit.md 3 cited, 0 missing
|
|
# ui-title-build-map.md 11 cited, 0 missing
|
|
# structures/ui-paint-order-key.md 11 cited, 0 missing
|
|
# menu-navigation-semantics.md 11 cited, 0 missing
|
|
# boot-config-and-gamepart-registry.md 3 cited, 0 missing
|
|
# screen-transitions.md 4 cited, 0 missing
|
|
# menu-audio-cues.md 2 cited, 0 missing
|
|
# movie-binding.md 2 cited, 0 missing
|
|
# structures/bgm-two-stems.md 1 cited, 0 missing
|
|
#
|
|
# And spot-checked for substance rather than mere existence, since the gate's
|
|
# PURPOSE is that the port can work without a disc:
|
|
# splash-ramp-check.txt 1 197 B 15 numeric lines
|
|
# fade-envelope-menu-to-title 2 373 B 34
|
|
# fade-four-transitions.txt 20 737 B 198
|
|
# se-cue-runtime-offsets.txt 2 258 B 17
|
|
# se-ui-cues.txt 7 134 B 324
|
|
# bgm-wave-census.txt 3 369 B 33
|
|
#
|
|
# ✅ CLEAN. Both halves present for all ten, and unlike the port's P0 they were
|
|
# also INDEXED -- HANDOFF's status table cites the page, the page cites the data.
|
|
#
|
|
# ⚠️ REACH, because a clean audit is only worth its checks. This tests that CITED
|
|
# files EXIST and are non-trivial. It does NOT test that the data supports the
|
|
# claim, and it cannot see data a page SHOULD have cited and did not. A page
|
|
# citing nothing would have passed as "0 missing"; none did, but the check would
|
|
# not have caught it. Existence and substance, not sufficiency.
|
|
|
|
################################################################################
|
|
# THE ABSENCE CHECK -- the half the audit above could not see. 2026-08-30.
|
|
#
|
|
# sylpheed-port's sufficiency audit found the thing that "passes every check by
|
|
# being absent": an authored value carrying no `why` at all. The analogue here is
|
|
# a page that cites NO reference data, which my gate audit above would score as
|
|
# "0 missing" and pass. So: of every page with a measured/decoded/CONFIRMED
|
|
# status, which cites no data/ or captures/ path?
|
|
#
|
|
# 42 pages with such a status
|
|
# 3 citing no data/ or captures/ path
|
|
#
|
|
# ⚠️ INSPECTED BEFORE PUBLISHING, per the port's rule that a first count from a new
|
|
# detector is a measurement of the detector. All three are FALSE POSITIVES, and
|
|
# each was verified rather than waved through:
|
|
#
|
|
# structures/slb-bank-header-not-a-wave.md -- cites tests/slb_leading_segment_
|
|
# disc.rs, and that file EXISTS in crates/sylpheed-formats/tests/. Its evidence
|
|
# is a disc-wide check over 9 519 sound.pak entries plus regression tests.
|
|
# structures/ui-screen-runtime.md -- 26 rows of inline evidence tables, live
|
|
# guest-memory reads matched field by field against the file.
|
|
# five-screens-acceptance.md -- a consolidation page; its evidence is the six
|
|
# pages it links and the numbers it tabulates from them.
|
|
#
|
|
# ✅ 3 -> 0 real.
|
|
#
|
|
# 📌 AND THE REAL FINDING IS ABOUT THE EARLIER AUDIT. This corpus carries evidence
|
|
# in at least THREE forms -- committed data files, inline tables, and committed
|
|
# disc tests -- and both checks look for exactly one of them. "48 citations, 0
|
|
# missing" above is therefore a statement about the data-file form, not about
|
|
# whether the gates are evidenced. The gates ARE evidenced; the audit was narrower
|
|
# than its wording suggested.
|