The Decoder reported that three of their corrections were a LABEL being wrong
rather than a measurement -- the right number pointed at the wrong element -- and
asked me to re-check any figure of theirs that names an element.
Audited all five the port carries. All clean: ptloop01's 30-unit ramp,
pteff03's 600-unit loop, ptbtn00f's 120-unit pulse and peak alpha 80,
looping_focus_records' period and record_element, and F6's parent gate.
📌 And the reason is worth naming: the port was protected NOT by discipline but
because every element-named figure it carries is ALSO declared on the disc, so
each was independently checkable. That protection is now structural rather than
a one-off audit, because it fails silently in both directions -- a relayed number
pointed at the wrong element drifts from the declared one, and a re-export that
re-times a keyframe moves the declared one underneath an authored value that was
right when written. audit-kinds cannot see either: it checks that a why CITES
something, not that the number still agrees.
⚠️ Scope is deliberately narrow: only values with a declared counterpart are
checkable. A measured constant with no disc equivalent -- the leaf rate itself --
cannot be verified this way and is not pretended to be.
Selftest in both directions; in check-all.
e9a57e2167