Their 49771 is exact RGBA inequality, not a threshold, so it belongs against my
59530 rather than my 48368 -- they corrected that before I could match the
convenient pair. At >1 we agree to 325 px (0.67%).
Checked here: my value-exactly-1 population is 11162 px and the gap above >1 is
325, so 9434 of the 9759-px gap (96.7%) is value-1 pixels. Their claim holds
structurally.
Carries two conventions: >0 is not portable between renderers on a mostly-dark
frame and >1 is, so a cross-renderer ink figure must name its threshold; and the
without-the-rule zero is threshold-insensitive in both renderers.
One refinement on their 18 confirmations: for the port's four, 'has its own key'
means palogo_eff0's IMPLIED key -- the crate's measured per-name entry, not file
data. So those are 'another measurement already settles it', not 'the file
settles it' -- the distinction their own page insists on for pteff00.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF
ec5861cec8