eef45ecfd6
P5's gate is "a human clicks through it". The artifact is a scripted walk that
proves the wiring rather than the intent -- up (wraps 01->05), five down, (A)
into EXTRAS, down, (B) back, landing on the main menu with focus RESTORED to
EXTRAS, ten PNGs one per settled step:
xvfb-run -a godot --path port -- --menu \
--script=up,down,down,down,down,down,accept,down,cancel --shots=/tmp/p5
--script posts InputEventAction through Input.parse_input_event so the presses
arrive at _unhandled_input exactly as a d-pad's would. Calling MenuFlow directly
would have been shorter and would have proved nothing: the wiring between a
press and the cursor is the part most likely to be broken, and a direct call is
exactly the part that skips it.
Derived vs authored, which P5 is the easiest place to blur:
* DERIVED -- the ORDER of the items, from each screen file's `buttons`, which
the exporter already fills from button-role elements sorted by resting Y.
* AUTHORED -- destinations, initial focus, what (B) does, and left/right being
a no-op. All measured off the running game (HANDOFF Q4/Q5) or chosen, none
on the disc, all in authored/flow.json with a why.
Four of five main-menu destinations are `goto: null` with a `blocked` note. That
is a MILESTONE BOUNDARY, not an unknown -- DIFFICULTY, the save list, the lesson
list and OPTIONS were all measured and live in archives this export does not
carry. `blocked` and `none` are kept apart so nobody later "discovers" the gap.
--headless CANNOT DRAW, and the port hung instead of saying so.
Measured, not assumed: under --headless Godot's dummy renderer never emits
RenderingServer.frame_post_draw, so every capture path awaited it forever --
--capture since P1, --film since P3, --shots as of now. With stdout block-
buffered the observable behaviour was SILENCE, FOREVER, which in a loop reads as
a job still working. Isolated by `--quit` (prints, exits 0) vs `--capture` (zero
bytes, killed at 40 s). Now those three flags refuse at STARTUP naming the
xvfb-run line that works, and --script no longer waits for a frame it is not
going to photograph -- so headless walks the menus in 4.5 s as a cheap
regression check needing no X server.
REFUTATION ATTEMPT, against the Decoder's 7eeae30 point 2 ("the oracle confirms
the game renders the ring's rotation"). Aimed there because PROTOCOL says to aim
at a claim the port is about to build on that rests on an estimator whose own
control the Decoder reported as +/-19.8 deg. IT SURVIVES, more strongly than
claimed.
Both captures draw the SAME sprite (ptbtneff01) 240 px apart, so "is it drawn
rotated" becomes "are these two crops one image at a different angle" -- no crop
offset needed and no reference to our own renderer. 360-bin angular luminance
profile over the annulus, circularly cross-correlated. Two controls first: known
rotations 0/30/90/150/210/270/330 recovered with 0 deg error, and a ring-free
patch of the same capture peaks at 0.369, so the estimator does not manufacture
matches. Then: A vs B 134 deg (corr 0.968), sprite vs A 76 deg, sprite vs B
210 deg -- and 210-76 = 134, which nothing in the method forced.
So 0 deg is NOT A POSE THE GAME SHOWS, and screen_view.gd draws the ring at
0 deg. That is now stated in the code as known-wrong rather than suspected. The
port did NOT start spinning it: the period has two unknowns and both are the
Decoder's -- the second keyframe is untimed, and "groups hold" predicts a stop
at 360 = 0 which contradicts both captures. Two frames of one focused button a
known time apart settle it. Filed in BLOCKED.md and asked over the channel.
BLOCKED.md's staleness check was half a check. It tested whether that page is
stale relative to HANDOFF; it cannot see the other direction, and the other
direction is what happened -- 7eeae30 lands 27 minutes AFTER HANDOFF was last
written and answers a question HANDOFF still lists as open. Added the missing
half: `git log --oneline 9ca1eb5..HEAD -- docs/re/`.
Also recorded, since the two were nearly confused: the ring's annulus centroid
lands within ~0.4 px of its design position under a ZERO crop offset, which
corroborates ORACLE-CAPTURES' "1279x675, top-left aligned" on a feature nobody
chose for the purpose. The earlier "text bands at design y + 23" is an offset
WITHIN the button sprite, not a crop offset.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CtmUw5N5LJaMW1Njb8Ziey
Authored decisions
Everything here is a decision we made, not something the disc said. It is
hand-written, committed, and survives a re-export — unlike export/, which is
regenerated wholesale and must never be hand-edited.
Every entry carries a why. When the RE agent decodes the real answer, delete
the entry and let the exporter emit it; that deletion is the measure of
progress.
See docs/FORMAT.md for the schemas and docs/BLOCKED.md for which HANDOFF
question each placeholder is standing in for.